Seems like we want an attacking one between him, Cucu and Alonso. Mind you, have you seen the likes of Chilwell and Estupinan this season? Practically playing as second strikers.
Marc Cucurella - World Class Hairdo
- Thread starter P-Ro
- Start date
-
Nik (@Rood) and Imran (@Annihilate Now!) discuss United's fantastic win away against Athletic Club in the semi-final of the Europa League.
They also pick out the positives of United's 4-3 loss away at Brentford, and Nik reviews a day out at Old Trafford watching Manchester United Women qualify for the Champions League.
That only comes into play if he doesn't spend full year here, which I guess he will anyway. Good to point out though.
Almost as if it was done on purpose…….
I’d rather get Evra out of retirement, hell even Irwin, that have to watch that useless lump for for us.
That's a very dumb tweet which makes zero sense. Why would Chelsea ever want to loan out a player, who is an occasional starter, on a 6 month loan deal at the beggining of a new season? If Chilwell is injured, which he often is, Cucurella will get many games.
The only bone of contention is the loan fee. The Glazer parasites are penny pinching.
Chelsea: “You want him for the season 7m”
Bozos: “We might send him back in January. So £2m now and if we decide to keep him £3m in January for the remainder…”
Bhoely dummies guide to bending EPL rules: “Start him in the Cup, then they can’t send him back”
Why? Seems to be a Chelsea feck up, not ours?
I think we can still send him back, just that Chelsea can no longer loan him to another (3rd) club the same season.
Irrespective of who fecked up, the bigger question is who was fecked?
I meant to quote Reguilon links.
It’s actually ridiculous that the Club thought Chelsea would be fine with a 6 month loan. Just take him for the year and be done with it.
What a dumb move from Chelsea playing him last night.
Woh, what an awful player. Why did Chelsea spend £50mil on him? Also we must be desperate to go for him, looks a liability.
His best ability is to help keep posession without being penerative with it.
"Jack of no trades, master of none"
Hes that bad.
Last edited:
We getting Regulion now by the looks of things. So Chelsea’s loss.
Really don't want Cucurella or Reguilon. Over-expensive and only useful short term.
Seems like Shaw's injury might be quite bad and caused by overplaying which is a worry, but surely that should give Fernandez a chance. And by the sounds of it Malacia will be back after a few games.
Seems like Shaw's injury might be quite bad and caused by overplaying which is a worry, but surely that should give Fernandez a chance. And by the sounds of it Malacia will be back after a few games.
Really don't want Reguilon.
Chelsea are probably indifferent to be fair
Cucurella is behind Chilwell, Colwill and Maatsen in the pecking order for the LB spot.
The idea of any loan from Chelsea's perspective would be to get a loan fee, get something back on the wages they're wasting on him and hope to generate interest so they can get rid of him permanently.
The point of the tweet is that we're the ones who'd ideally want it to be a 6 month loan as we wouldn't need him once our other players are fit, so there's no point paying for him any longer than that. However, Cucurella playing the other night means Chelsea are less likely to accept that arrangement, as they'd then be stuck with him from January on, unable to move him on anywhere else. So if they're going to loan him now they'd want it to be for the season, so they're rid of him (and getting at least a contribution to his wages) until they can try to ditch him permanently in the summer.
Reguilon is terrible, so a bigger loss for us I’m afraid.
Reguilon is absolutely crap. At least with Cucherella there is the potential that he might find his Brighton form from somewhere... but with Reguilon we definitely know what we're gonna get (crap)
We need a Reguilion one.
I'd rathjer just stick with Fernandez than Reguillon. both will make mistakes, one at least has a ceiling
That would be the point of the loan no? Although Reguilon might not be useful even in short term.
Reguilon has 6x as many caps for Spain as Cucumber.
Excellent player.
Excellent player.
If the only option is Reguilon then yes play Fernandez and be done with this nonsense.
What a dumb move from Chelsea playing him last night.
I assume it was absolutely deliberate on Chelsea's part. Chelsea think he's crap and don't want him back in January. Now that he's played for them, it rules out the possibility of a six-month loan deal (you can't play for three clubs in the same season), so we are forced to take him for the full season or turn to someone much, much worse (Reguilon).
Imagine a left-hand side of Reguilon and Sancho.
Might as well flood that side of the pitch it would be so wet.
Might as well flood that side of the pitch it would be so wet.
It’s his dream to play in the Carabao Cup.
Top 3 full-back of the modern era I've heard?
God....Help us ...Regulion... is our only hope!
What's Patrice up to these days?
Don't rate Reguillon but would happily recruit his sexy missus Marta Diaz as a United WAG
I am old enough to remember all the scouts on here who fumed when we didn’t sign Reguilon when he went to Spurs.
Why can’t we take Cucurella for the season and let Malacia go on loan in January?
Nevermind Patrice, give me Phil sodding Neville.
Get Buttner in.