tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Typical lite pep. He is such a tryhard.We took it less seriously than them seeing is how we played 2 teams in each half, while Arteta played the team he started for 60 minutes
Typical lite pep. He is such a tryhard.We took it less seriously than them seeing is how we played 2 teams in each half, while Arteta played the team he started for 60 minutes
I’d still expect that with Jesus, Martinelli and Saka with odegaard in behind they will have enough goals to beat the lesser teams consistently, but I really question whether they have completely unbalanced that settled team with the summer signings. They should have prioritised a top number 8 in place of Havertz and maybe even Rice too. I’d say they will have a decent season again, but could see them being well off the title pace this year and in more of a top 4 battle.Worryingly for Arsenal they looked back to their peak mid 2010s there - no bottle, doing nothing with possession and no one shooting unless they are 4 inches from goal.
havertz looks just as smeg there as at chelsea as well. They will hope that things pick up.
Given the rumours earlier in the summer of Arsenal trying to offload him to Saudi Arabia I definitely think Rice was bought to be Partey’s replacement but I can’t see them selling him now. I think Partey will be a starter for them. Havertz is a huge head scratcher. Their best XI doesn’t include him but they did spend £65m on him.The 2 I listed are new costing £170m. They are bought to be starters.
Yeah you had to go to ESPN +My stream cut off after the match so missing the pens
I’d still expect that with Jesus, Martinelli and Saka with odegaard in behind they will have enough goals to beat the lesser teams consistently, but I really question whether they have completely unbalanced that settled team with the summer signings. They should have prioritised a top number 8 in place of Havertz and maybe even Rice too. I’d say they will have a decent season again, but could see them being well off the title pace this year and in more of a top 4 battle.
The problem is Rice and Partey don’t have the right balance for what Arteta is trying to do. It’s far too defensive and not enough quality on the ball. Both fulfill the same role. Rice is a good player but Partey is currently still better.Given the rumours earlier in the summer of Arsenal trying to offload him to Saudi Arabia I definitely think Rice was bought to be Partey’s replacement but I can’t see them selling him now. I think Partey will be a starter for them. Havertz is a huge head scratcher. Their best XI doesn’t include him but they did spend £65m on him.
Yeh for all the hype on their signings I completely agree. Looks like square pegs in round holes for me to be honest. I’d probably rather have smith Rowe at Utd than Havertz tbh!Havertz transfer baffled me. He’s cack up front and they already had Odegaard, Vieira and Smith Rowe for the advanced midfield positions. They’ve also signed another cb to play at right back
I’d still expect that with Jesus, Martinelli and Saka with odegaard in behind they will have enough goals to beat the lesser teams consistently, but I really question whether they have completely unbalanced that settled team with the summer signings. They should have prioritised a top number 8 in place of Havertz and maybe even Rice too. I’d say they will have a decent season again, but could see them being well off the title pace this year and in more of a top 4 battle.
Partey came on and immediately looked like their best midfielder. Thing is I like Rice and he’s a good player but currently Partey remains the better player.
I’m not convinced that Rice can play that Xhaka role. He’s not a bad dribbler but not good enough generally outside of that in attack. Just looks very defensive to me. I don’t see it being as effective.They will play together a lot. Rice will be Xhaka's replacement. Especially in the big games. That's when they will play 4-2-3-1. In the games they are supposed to dominate it will be Rice or Partey rotating most likely with Havertz then stepping in
Rice has to play given the transfer cost, and Partey is their best midfielder. Odegaard will always play and then they have Havertz brought in for big money. Odd squad planning. Similar to them having 3 CB/RB hybrids now with the Timber purchase, but Zinchenko and Tierney, who Arteta doesn’t seem to rate that highly, on the left.The problem is Rice and Partey don’t have the right balance for what Arteta is trying to do. It’s far too defensive and not enough quality on the ball. Both fulfill the same role. Rice is a good player but Partey is currently still better.
Why was there a penalty shoot-out at the end of a win?
I think the difference with Utd is that Mount brings so much more energy in midfield than Erkisen who he’s replacing and that alone I think makes us more defensively solid. Eriksen is a classy player but he runs in treacle at this age. Xhaka wasn’t my favourite player, but he undoubtably had his best season last year and that player is not an easy one to replace, not convinced they have done a good job of it.Yeah they could have unbalanced their midfield in particular. They had a solid base of Partey and Xhaka, with Odegaard ahead. He effectively turned that upside down now, which is also what ETH has done with the Mount signing. I would have thought Rice would be a good upgrade on Xhaka, but completely removing one his deeper midfielders could unsettle it all. It remains to be seen but it is interesting that we've done the same. Almost like both teams are trying to copy City. Especially with the tucked in full backs.
Early days too but Timber didn't look great. I expect White will start the season at RB and they may even start Partey alongside Rice and try to gradually change their system.
Havertz signing makes no sense. He is awful. Don't know what Arteta sees in him. Even though they've signed Rice, I think Arsenal's midfield was better last season.Havertz transfer baffled me. He’s cack up front and they already had Odegaard, Vieira and Smith Rowe for the advanced midfield positions. They’ve also signed another cb to play at right back
For the Americans. Trying to garner some excitement around soccer, and on the off chance the game was boring they announced before the game there would be a penalty shootout at the end regardless.Why was there a penalty shoot-out at the end of a win?
Hot house flowers you mean.Rice and Havertz need to be acclimated guys. They're fishes.
We took it less seriously than them seeing is how we played 2 teams in each half, while Arteta played the team he started for 60 minutes
For the Americans. Trying to garner some excitement around soccer, and on the off chance the game was boring they announced before the game there would be a penalty shootout at the end regardless.
It was stated by someone - I think the MUTV commentators - that both managers wanted to have a penalty shootout regardless of the outcome to use it as practice/training/evaluation of the players, presumably thinking it's better to have genuine opponents to test against and also for crowd pressure. Well, as much as one can get in a friendly, anyway!Why was there a penalty shoot-out at the end of a win?
Arsenal looked very much like they were playing a meaningless pre-season friendly on a warm day in New York in July - which to be fair, they were. United definitely seemed to be more up for it, despite playing a weaker team on paper in both halves.Fans in Arsemania thinks Arsenal outplayed United. Did they actually watch the game?
They've never done this in any other country except the US, and United go all over the place, China, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, Sweden, Norway etc.This is just a lazy comment, United have been selling out games in the US for years now, just some practice in front of 80k fans
Indeed which was I understand first proposed by Arteta and ETH agreedThis is just a lazy comment, United have been selling out games in the US for years now, just some practice in front of 80k fans
For the Americans. Trying to garner some excitement around soccer, and on the off chance the game was boring they announced before the game there would be a penalty shootout at the end regardless.
A case for the 2nd half, but certainly not the 1st. We were all over the place 2nd half and we cant play like that when the league starts. I dont think we will though.Fans in Arsemania thinks Arsenal outplayed United. Did they actually watch the game?
They've never done this in any other country except the US, and United go all over the place, China, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, Sweden, Norway etc.
Indeed which was I understand first proposed by Arteta and ETH agreed
They've never done this in any other country except the US, and United go all over the place, China, Thailand, Vietnam, Australia, Sweden, Norway etc.
They both thought it was a good idea as a training exercise in front of 80K fans, basically it wasn't a gimmick for US fans as some have suggestedMakes sense, obviously wouldn't do this every preseason match but once in a while against PL opposition makes sense I think
So Arteta decides how the games are arranged now? Okay...Thanks for showing your ignorance...Arteta wanted to go ahead with penalties as a practice.