André Dominguez
Full Member
Ok. I wasn't saying "the Rodri decision wasn't an issue and the Sterling one was", just that City's forwards (including Sterling who I think has been in poor form for a while) didn't trouble Chelsea's CHs.
It's not THIS Pep choice was the reason they lost, the OTHERS weren't, it's a collective.
Not playing Rodri/Fernandinho as a Def Mid, playing Gundogan out of position, not playing a proper CF (to make the CHs work), only putting a sub on by necessity (the KdB injury)... it's all of them.
Yet again, Pep over-thinks things instead of trusting his usual team/game plan.
But give the man a midfield of Busquets, Xavi, Iniesta plus an all time great and fair play to him, he does win trophies
I understood the idea: have a more attacking midfield to make sure Chelsea would be pressed high on the pitch and using KdB as player in the hole would in theory create a midfield overload that Chelsea would have problems to cope. As Gundogan is quite proactive and less positional, this created problems to City defense when Chelsea made quick transitions.
And as you pointed, Sterling didn't either provided depth or width with quality and was sloppy on the offball movements, which made Chilwell very confortable joining either the midfield battle when needed or having enough time to pick the bal wide.
His idea was not bad, he just didn't had the right players to do it.