mariachi-19
Full Member
I do wonder if we've pulled out of this Dyabala deal because inter have stumped up the cash and we were using Juve to get at Inter...
I do wonder if we've pulled out of this Dyabala deal because inter have stumped up the cash and we were using Juve to get at Inter...
If true we should take that and hand it to Palace for Zaha.
We pulled out because of his ridiculous wage demands to come.We haven't pulled out, Dybala doesn't want to come, and there is no way that Inter can raise more than £60m for Lukaku.
We pulled out because of his ridiculous wage demands to come.
If you actually believe that...
Did ole target any natural right winger or central midfielder? It falls on him too. Rivals have strengthened with Pepe and ndombele , where were we?
Yes it's Woodward's fault for getting drawn into this swap deal but we haven't targetted other players either.
I’ll be disappointed if he stays here after the window closes.
Rather keep him as a bench option than buy no one, even if he's made himself like a total tit with his actions lately.
I agreed with everything you said except the part about Herrera. In no way does he deserve to be called that. He was a model professional here, and his contract was up. How does accepting a generous deal from PSG make him a wanker?I do actually because it falls completely inline with the clubs perspective after bringing in Ole. Just because it upsets transfer muppets, doesn't mean it isnt true.
If a player does not want to play for us for any reason other than money, he can feck off to PSG with that wanker Herrera who did exactly the same thing. I dont want mercenaries at my club or people wanting to hold the club ransom for their wage demands.
That would involve him hitting the target against a quality opponent - he’s not capable of doing that.
I meant calling someone a prick pal.
Your making a prick of yourself. Go to bed and get in the real world.
Ok mr prick, have a good night.
It would be insane to sell him without bringing in another striker.
I am confident about us struggling again this season if we only manage to bring in Maguire without replacing him. Lukaku may not be the answer but to rely on our current options is madness.I am confident about our youth, so would not care about him being sold.
I am confident about us struggling again this season if we only manage to bring in Maguire without replacing him. Lukaku may not be the answer but to rely on our current options is madness.
Ed Woodward is a closet Scouser.that's how I see it. Having said that, we're probably starting the season with no replacement for Herrera, no cover for the ageing Matic, with no DOF and with DDG's contract not yet sorted. Nothing surprises me at this club anymore
Ed Woodward is a closet Scouser.
I dont rate Lukaku very highly myself. A striker with no first touch has no business being at us. But... he is a proven, experienced goal scorer which we're in no position to be turning our noses up at. Rashford is not good enough yet to become main striker, Martial has zero experience and Greenwood is 17. Do you really believe we can get top 4 with them? I dont.No, it is not. Lukaku is not some player on the level of Ronaldo that we cannot replace. I think our young players can replace him just fine. I would rather try and get Fernandes for the money of Lukaku, as it will add to our midfield, an area we do need some more bodies in.
Yep, the Glazers are lousy owners. It's eerily similar how Tampa Bay are run, even down to having a clueless bulletproof general manager running the show.I think we're being run in the same lines Tampa Bay is ie badly
I dont rate Lukaku very highly myself. A striker with no first touch has no business being at us. But... he is a proven, experienced goal scorer which we're in no position to be turning our noses up at. Rashford is not good enough yet to become main striker, Martial has zero experience and the Greenwood is 17. Do you really believe we can get top 4 with them? I dont.
And I struggle to see how we are going to find a team willing to meet our valuation of Lukaku. Inter can't afford him & Juve were only interested so they could create funds. Without Dybala, that deal seems dead.
They have quite a few players we'd potentially could be interested in. I think inter will structure a deal prior to the window closing as Conte is hard for him.
.
I dont rate Lukaku very highly myself. A striker with no first touch has no business being at us. But... he is a proven, experienced goal scorer which we're in no position to be turning our noses up at. Rashford is not good enough yet to become main striker, Martial has zero experience and the Greenwood is 17. Do you really believe we can get top 4 with them? I dont.
And I struggle to see how we are going to find a team willing to meet our valuation of Lukaku. Inter can't afford him & Juve were only interested so they could create funds. Without Dybala, that deal seems dead.
Would you mind mentioning them? The only player I can think of is Icardi. I doubt he'll want to come as well.
We can get top 4 without Lukaku I am confident about that. All this crap about being a proven goalscorera yet he barely scored more goals than Rashford and Martial. I expect them to both score more this season, and the likes of Greenwood, Chong and Gomes to step up as well. We need an improvement on Lingard and Mata though. They should not be starters, and we need more quality in that position.
Juve not Inter
Whom exactly would you want from Juventus? Matuidi? Madzukic? Most of these players have 1 foot in their career's grave.
United should have spent the dosh to replace Matic, Herrera and bring 1-2 top quality wingers. Only then we could have said, feck it, lets sell Lukaku, move Martial upfront and then buy no one.
Whom exactly would you want from Juventus? Matuidi? Madzukic? Most of these players have 1 foot in their career's grave.
United should have spent the dosh to replace Matic, Herrera and bring 1-2 top quality wingers. Only then we could have said, feck it, lets sell Lukaku, move Martial upfront and then buy no one.