Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
£100m for Lukaku...feck me.
That’s exactly the reason we are doubtful of him and exactly the reason we were happy to offload him.Why are United fans doubtful of Lukaku's ability? We literally saw him in a red shirt for 2 years.
Why are United fans doubtful of Lukaku's ability? We literally saw him in a red shirt for 2 years. We know exactly what he is (and isn't capable of). Hope Chelsea succeed in their pursuit. Doesn't add anything that I'd be worried about other than guaranteed goals against fodder.
I'm clearly in the minority but I thought he did well here. Did not look as smooth and crafty as a Rashford but he put the ball in the back of the net.That’s exactly the reason we are doubtful of him and exactly the reason we were happy to offload him.
He will always score goals wherever he goes but your whole team would have to function in a way that suits him. Giving the ball to Ashley Young at left to cut inside and cross it to him was a major part of our strategy under Jose.I'm clearly in the minority but I thought he did well here. Did not look as smooth and crafty as a Rashford but he put the ball in the back of the net.
London is a far better city than Milan, by a long way. Imo of course, and I live in North Manchester.
Always found Milan a bit of a disappointment compared to other Italian cities.
Why are United fans doubtful of Lukaku's ability? We literally saw him in a red shirt for 2 years. We know exactly what he is (and isn't capable of). Hope Chelsea succeed in their pursuit. Doesn't add anything that I'd be worried about other than guaranteed goals against fodder.
A goal scorer with his record domestically and internationally, leading Inter to their first title in over 11 years, winning the Serie A player of the year… feck me. I guess you’ve got to wear really short shorts and win a lot of fouls to be valued at that fee.£100m for Lukaku...feck me.
His spell wasn't exactly a failure in terms of goals but that whole muscle gain thing was one of the most ridiculous things i've seen in terms of the impact it had. It really didn't help him or the team, i often remember him looking knackered after a sprint.Why are United fans doubtful of Lukaku's ability? We literally saw him in a red shirt for 2 years. We know exactly what he is (and isn't capable of). Hope Chelsea succeed in their pursuit. Doesn't add anything that I'd be worried about other than guaranteed goals against fodder.
What's he good at again?There's not a player more underrated by the Caf than Lukaku. It's ridiculous how so many people refuse to admit he's a very good striker. He'd improve Chelsea quite a bit and possibly make them title challengers. Still, better him than Haaland.
We watched him literally stink it up here for two years if anything our fans should be the best possible judge of his abilities. He's just not that good, simple as that.There's not a player more underrated by the Caf than Lukaku. It's ridiculous how so many people refuse to admit he's a very good striker. He'd improve Chelsea quite a bit and possibly make them title challengers. Still, better him than Haaland.
Scoring goals. Nice treat to have for a striker.What's he good at again?
Ohh be quiet you clown, he is a donkey nothing to do with his race. Also, donkeys aren't even black ffs. Do you not think it could be because he has a touch like a bag of cement?Anytime you hear the word donkey or animal refering to a player, it seems to be towards a black player. Not sure its just me but the tone always makes me wonder and question the reasoning behind it…
Meh not the single biggest thing in modern football. Technical ability is more vital if you can only have one or the other.Scoring goals. Nice treat to have for a striker.
The one thing Chelsea lacked last season was a striker putting away their chances. Lukaku is that guy.Meh not the single biggest thing in modern football. Technical ability is more vital if you can only have one or the other.
Anytime you hear the word donkey or animal refering to a player, it seems to be towards a black player. Not sure its just me but the tone always makes me wonder and question the reasoning behind it…
. Indeed.Ohh be quiet you clown, he is a donkey nothing to do with his race. Also, donkeys aren't even black ffs. Do you not think it could be because he has a touch like a bag of cement?
Giroud is also referred to as a donkey.Anytime you hear the word donkey or animal refering to a player, it seems to be towards a black player. Not sure its just me but the tone always makes me wonder and question the reasoning behind it…
Yea, just you.Anytime you hear the word donkey or animal refering to a player, it seems to be towards a black player. Not sure its just me but the tone always makes me wonder and question the reasoning behind it…
Somehow getting a decent number of em while missing sitter after sitter, sometimes missing the ball completely, and fecking up loads of opportunities before he even gets chance to shoot. It's no surprise we score more without him, even if the striker doesn't.Scoring goals. Nice treat to have for a striker.
Nah, Andy Carroll was labelled a useless donkey too.Anytime you hear the word donkey or animal refering to a player, it seems to be towards a black player. Not sure its just me but the tone always makes me wonder and question the reasoning behind it…
I usually refer to Andy Carroll as a majestic unicorn.Nah, Andy Carroll was labelled a useless donkey too.
Grealish fee is ridiculous.A goal scorer with his record domestically and internationally, leading Inter to their first title in over 11 years, winning the Serie A player of the year… feck me. I guess you’ve got to wear really short shorts and win a lot of fouls to be valued at that fee.