Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,970
It's also the 4-3-3 for me. If I'd put Becks in a 4-3-3 it would be in midfield rather than wide forward. If he's parked alongside Keane and Matthaus it makes it less difficult for the opposition to counter only Sheva and Rivaldo who are the primarily attacking sources. Against 2 GOAT full backs, GOAT defender in Beckenbauer and well protected core with three highly dynamic midfielders to counter Matthaus and Keane and Luisito in deep position it would be hard to break down that onenil side.Like Beckham's role here in terms of the tactical instructions. Looks too high on the team-sheet which is more about presentational symmetry in the attack, but in the game he'd find himself parked alongside Keane and Matthaus in a very functional role that plays to his strengths releasing Shevchenko on the counter or unfurling a diagonal into Rivaldo's path.
Most of the time they will be outnumbered and would not find much space. If there was RW instead of Becks who would offer significant attacking threat and goalscoring output this could be very close.
In short Becks doesn't provide the attacking outlet his team needs and whilst his industry is positive, Matthaus doesn't really need this defensive cover considering he has Keane next to him and Luisito behind him. Matthaus was able to produce a lot in the attacking phase for Inter whilst having to also man mark no other than Maradona. Against 4-3-3 where he's in a bit of a free role out of the other 3, he would have no issues filling the gaps he left rather quickly.