Liverpool won't touch Donatello even with a bargepole; ain't worth the headache.Just putting it out there, I think Mbappe would bring toxicity to a dressing room. Just the vibe I get from him, maybe because of the extent he’s had it his own way at PSG.
We never sign players at their peak like that anyway. Thiago is the only one and Bayern were happy to let him go which speaks volumes. Maybe Alisson.
Everyone else we’ve signed would be in the up and coming bracket.
There are 74 million reasons a season he will not join Liverpool. Its fun listening to the worry but it’s so far unrealistic unless of course he comes on a free or reduced fee and Salah is sold. I suppose all that escarole would pay for his wages for a few years.Liverpool won't touch Donatello even with a bargepole; ain't worth the headache.
On the flip side, Neymar came to Barcelona with diva baggage but he got it together for MSN trio period.
(Best attacking trio ever existed)
Eventually it flared up again when he agitated for a move to PSG to be a leading man.
Maybe Klopp have the cajones to rein in Mbappe for short-term but we all know FSG is stickler for long-term project.
Ergo, ain't happening
Robertson will be back before you know it.Liverpool lost the league when Tsimikas broke his collarbone. Gomez at LB is a liability.
This is interesting, because there's been a massive discussion on Flumenensie and their chaos like tactics.The front line are so fecking brainless, it is astonishing how they are top of the league. They all cause chaos, so maybe that's the trade off, create a bucket load of chances, but only score 30% of them. I can't see this team beating City over a full season.
So I have seen videos on this, but that seems to be extreme overloads and lack of shape which sows the seeds of chaos there. Liverpool is directness and pace in behind, but still quite a traditional build up. The randomness of decisions and technique up top seems to be so bizarre - Nunez a prime example, but Szolozbai is no different and Diaz today felt the same.This is interesting, because there's been a massive discussion on Flumenensie and their chaos like tactics.
Liverpool maybe could be held in similar regards.
Although I think they are, or at least certainly recently, relying on individual brilliance to see them through.
Oh god, why did you remind me.Hope they don't win the quadruple again.
I think it is since 2016 (they mentioned it on twitter)Apparently it’s been tracked since 2010. 13 seasons is a pretty big sample, no?
Saw some Liverpool fans on the BBC HYS moaning about Elliott getting booked for waving his arms around but Arsenal players weren't.
Laughable really.
Weren't you all crying a few weeks back when Dalot got his two yellows while Nunez wasn't booked for dissent or something like that?Saw some Liverpool fans on the BBC HYS moaning about Elliott getting booked for waving his arms around but Arsenal players weren't.
Laughable really.
Weren't you all crying a few weeks back when Dalot got his two yellows while Nunez wasn't booked for dissent or something like that?
The majority of football fans think that they are getting hard done by by the referees and/or they hold a grudge against their particular team and that's what's laughable really.
Gonna be 20-20 in May.
Revolting.
Back to back trebles and 5,6 in a row are nothing compared with Pool's 20th title.Relax. Just going to be 4 in a row and possibly back to back trebles.
Probably because the teams playing in Europa are generally weakthere is a reason that no one has ever won tbe Premier League while playing in the Europa League.
I would rather the scousers get a 20th than a city second treble.Back to back trebles and 5,6 in a row are nothing compared with Pool's 20th title.
That could all change this season… scousers top of prem, Leverkusen top of Bundesliga and both in Europa.Probably because the teams playing in Europa are generally weak
How many top leagues have been won by teams playing in Europa league
I’d forgotten city won a treble to be honest whereas if Liverpool match our titles…..nah not having itI would rather the scousers get a 20th than a city second treble.
Why? City are meaningless. A soleless franchise. Any trophy they win, other than at our expense, should come with relief because it prevents one of our rivals (who are genuinely big clubs) from winning anything.I would rather the scousers get a 20th than a city second treble.
Ye that’s because they’ve won 1 just like us… if they win 2 we’ll never forget it.I’d forgotten city won a treble to be honest whereas if Liverpool match our titles…..nah not having it
Liverpool will only match us. City will overtake us with 2 trebles and 4 PL in a row which no other team has ever done.Why? City are meaningless. A soleless franchise. Any trophy they win, other than at our expense, should come with relief because it prevents one of our rivals (who are genuinely big clubs) from winning anything.
City's success means nothing, and could still be wiped from the history books anyway. Give me City winning the league every year over the scouse.Liverpool will only match us. City will overtake us with 2 trebles and 4 PL in a row which no other team has ever done.
I doubt they’ll get done for anything now.City's success means nothing, and could still be wiped from the history books anyway. Give me City winning the league every year over the scouse.
But it's City. Who cares what they do? Their success is irrelevant, unlike Arsenal's or Liverpool's. So many of our fans wanted us to be owned by similar owners to that of City, but what satisfaction could be gained from winning a league that way? It would be a case of 'well, what do you expect?'.Liverpool will only match us. City will overtake us with 2 trebles and 4 PL in a row which no other team has ever done.
Nobody has said City's success is okay to be fair. It just stings a lot less than any Liverpool success, and there are several valid reasons for this. It's a shit situation that we are in that it comes down to City or Liverpool, but I think it is okay to prefer one over the other.I’m sorry, but as I’ve said elsewhere, I seriously don’t agree with the people saying that City’s success is okay. I do agree that it is artificial and doesn’t count, but the history books won’t say that, and after all, they’re our local rivals. It’s a nightmare come true. Obviously Liverpool winning the league would be horrendous as well, but I personally can’t just sit there and pretend that City winning doesn’t mean anything. It 100% does, and it hurts. And not just because I engage with idiots on Facebook and Instagram.
Fair. It’s just that as a younger person who’s experienced a lot more of City’s success proportionally, both would sting a lot.Nobody has said City's success is okay to be fair. It just stings a lot less than any Liverpool success, and there are several valid reasons for this. It's a shit situation that we are in that it comes down to City or Liverpool, but I think it is okay to prefer one over the other.
