Litmanen - Demote to Newbies Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ban him mod..

He keep provoking other poster and feckin up all the threads.
For example, this thread is supposed to discuss players rating against Leicester, because of all the shite by Litmanen,the thread is :wenger: :wenger: :wenger:

and this one is to praise/congratulate Ruud for scoring a hattrick and the idiot is provoking most poster again.

Ban him!!!
 
Litmanen said:
BusbyReds one sentence copied out of context on PURPOSE may I add proves nothing. If you would have copied the whole post it would have sounded very different, as you know very well.
Click to expand...

You said you never called yourself a neutral when, quite clearly, you did.
 
rOnaldo[7] said:
Ban him mod..

He keep provoking other poster and feckin up all the threads.
For example, this thread is supposed to discuss players rating against Leicester, because of all the shite by Litmanen,the thread is :wenger: :wenger: :wenger:
Click to expand...

If you read the whole thread, you will see that I was having a discussion with BusbyReds.

and this one is to praise/congratulate Ruud for scoring a hattrick and the idiot is provoking most poster again.
Click to expand...

I was also congratulating him, but as I thought it was a thread on Ruud and there was no purpose to start another one I merely said what was an honest observation. I agree it was misjudged and I deleted my post.
 
BusbyReds said:
You said you never called yourself a neutral when, quite clearly, you did.
Click to expand...

That is another sentence you cut out of context.

Please copy the whole post and not just one sentence next time, thanks.

Cheers.
 
Litmanen said:
If you read the whole thread, you will see that I was having a discussion with BusbyReds.



I was also congratulating him, but as I thought it was a thread on Ruud and there was no purpose to start another one I merely said what was an honest observation. I agree it was misjudged and I deleted my post.
Click to expand...

In the ratings thread, you attacked my ratings, claimed that the 1-10 scale (which you, the thread starter, used for your own ratings) is useless, claimed to have football knowledge superior to mine despite the fact that you don't know an average performance when you see one, and finally claimed that I don't "get it." That seems like much less of a discussion than a (successful) attempt to wind me up in what should have been a serious thread.

In the Ruud thread, even though you admitted to not having seen the incidents clearly, you immediately accused Ruud of diving, thus reopening that debate in what was meant to be a positive thread praising Ruud for his performance.
 
Litmanen said:
That is another sentence you cut out of context.

Please copy the whole post and not just one sentence next time, thanks.

Cheers.
Click to expand...

Litmanen said:
I have never said I'm "neutral" and that's it.
Click to expand...


How much more context do you need? You are a lying WUM.
 
BusbyReds said:
In the ratings thread, you attacked my ratings, claimed that the 1-10 scale (which you, the thread starter, used for your own ratings) is useless, claimed to have football knowledge superior to mine despite the fact that you don't know an average performance when you see one, and finally claimed that I don't "get it." That seems like much less of a discussion than a (successful) attempt to wind me up in what should have been a serious thread.
Click to expand...

That's NOT what the discussion was about. I was trying to explain it to you.. but you were just hurling abuse, not listening.


In the Ruud thread, even though you admitted to not having seen the incidents clearly, you immediately accused Ruud of diving, thus reopening that debate in what was meant to be a positive thread praising Ruud for his performance.
Click to expand...

For fecks sake I did NOT accuse him of diving. I just said he seemed to go down easily. That is very different. And I praised him for his performance. Learn to read, please.
 
BusbyReds said:
How much more context do you need? You are a lying WUM.
Click to expand...

You KNOW that in the same post I say that I have no problem of calling myself a Manchester United supporter... and that I have grown attached to this club. That "neutral fan" comment was more about my backgrounds, and YOU cut it out of context on purpose. What's the point? Be honest buddy.

Cheers.
 
Litmanen said:
You KNOW that in the same post I say that I have no problem of calling myself a Manchester United supporter... and that I have grown attached to this club. That "neutral fan" comment was more about my backgrounds, and YOU cut it out of context on purpose. What's the point? Be honest buddy.

Cheers.
Click to expand...

You are no supporter.
 
Litmanen said:
That's NOT what the discussion was about. I was trying to explain it to you.. but you were just hurling abuse, not listening.
Click to expand...

YOU are the one who started off acting patronising towards me and acting like you don't know how the rating scale works.

I'm going to try to stop posting here, because I know that by acting like a cnut, I'm just giving you what you want.
 
BusbyReds said:
YOU are the one who started off acting patronising towards me and acting like you don't know how the rating scale works.

I'm going to try to stop posting here, because I know that by acting like a cnut, I'm just giving you what you want.
Click to expand...

Its easy to get drawn into his pathetic little world isnt it! :)

Wum or not, intentional or not, whatever, surely this forum would be better for everyone if he wasnt here. Full stop.
 
I'd have to agree that he should be shown the door. Whatever his intent etc, the caf has been nothing but one big slagging match between him and everybody else for days and it's getting boring. It's hard to find a proper thread this week that doesn't decend into a Litmanen argument :rolleyes:
 
A1Dan said:
I'd have to agree that he should be shown the door. Whatever his intent etc, the caf has been nothing but one big slagging match between him and everybody else for days and it's getting boring. It's hard to find a proper thread this week that doesn't decend into a Litmanen argument :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Very true.
 
Litmanen said:
You KNOW that in the same post I say that I have no problem of calling myself a Manchester United supporter... and that I have grown attached to this club. That "neutral fan" comment was more about my backgrounds, and YOU cut it out of context on purpose. What's the point? Be honest buddy.

Cheers.
Click to expand...

Litmanen,I think you're ok and should stay.I'll put in a good word with the mods for you.....that should swing it !! ;)


Hey,mods ......give the guy a break........just because he calls it the way he sees it,doesn't mean he's a WUM !! :angel:
 
Litmanen said:
For such a big and strong lad Ruud goes down suspiciously easily.

We should admit this, because the evidence is abundant and cannot be denied. Whether it is considered diving/cheating is another question. I'd tend to agree that it is diving and cheating to an extend. Others do it too, but that does not make it more right.

Can you imagine if you collided with another person on the street or in a supermarket that you would fall down so easily when there is only slight contact?
Click to expand...

...
 
Gillespie said:
Litmanen,I think you're ok and should stay.I'll put in a good word with the mods for you.....that should swing it !! ;)


Hey,mods ......give the guy a break........just because he calls it the way he sees it,doesn't mean he's a WUM !! :angel:
Click to expand...

Litmanen's death knell has sounded :lol:
 
I can't understand the mods on this one TBH. One minute they're doing mass culls and the next they're letting an obvious WUM (I believe a scouser from YAWN) feck about in the United forum with his ABU bollocks.

Get rid.
 
Ignore him, don't respond to his posts and he will go away of his own accord. Bans should only be for severe racial abuse, Munich comments and the like, not for expressing differing opinions to the norm.
If he posts shite and nobody responds then the thread does not deteriorate into a slagging match. I read the threads and skip straight past most of his posts because I know they add nothing worthwhile.
 
But why should the whole caf have to ignore him? Why not just get rid of him. As I said in this thread earlier, it's not the fact that he's a scouser that's the problem but his bullshit 'undercover' routine. He's beggining to ruin the United forum.
 
ManUinOz said:
Ignore him, don't respond to his posts and he will go away of his own accord. Bans should only be for severe racial abuse, Munich comments and the like, not for expressing differing opinions to the norm.
If he posts shite and nobody responds then the thread does not deteriorate into a slagging match. I read the threads and skip straight past most of his posts because I know they add nothing worthwhile.
Click to expand...

Why should we have to though? His posts reflect badly on the whole site, he claims he supports united yet the only people who agree with him are Gooners and Dippers. Football is a very emotional subject over here, like religion and if it was as easy as just saying "oh look another thread slagging off Ruud, i think i will just skip past that one" dont you think we would. Personally United occupies a great deal of my life, as sad as that sounds, and i happen to feel obliged to defend them if some muppet is attacking them without reason and with no evidence to back up their claims. Someone will ALWAYS answer back, he will respond and the cycle continues. It has to end sometime...
 
stoned.rose said:
Why do you all keep complaining about somebody who is not allowed to post on here.

:angel:
Click to expand...

I dont care what the rest say about you Stoned (infact i think most of its physically impossible), but i think your alright! ;)

Does this mean that my blood pressure can go back to something resembling normal now? Can i lower that red mist?
 
Ahhh,finally he's gone,good riddance!And ban Beckham R0x while you are at it MODs! :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.