WR
Frankie Barwell ITK
I think it says a lot on Messi's side, when Cal, the biggest Ronaldo fanboy going, can only now pick faults at his penalty record.
If you take away Messi's goals from open play he has only scored 2 this season.
if you take away ronaldos penaltis, he only scored 4 more goals than higuain
and higuain doesnt play as much games as ronaldo
That can't be real? 10 penalties?? SO take away penalties and Ronaldo has 18 goals to Messis 25? So Messi missed one in the league so that means Barca have had 3 penalties whilst madrid have had 10? that's some stat.
Aslo Messi was taking penalties before Guardiola was the manager, so the idea that he's "indulging" him is a bit off.
if you take away ronaldos penaltis, he only scored 4 more goals than higuain
and higuain doesnt play as much games as ronaldo
Stop. Don't go there or I will dismember you.
How about this, let's not use penalties to prove anything about Ronaldo or Messi, as it's completely immaterial. FV, Cal, you are both major embarassments to mankind.
Tbf you can't just "take away" a goal. He's a good penalty taker fair enough. He scores them with ease. A lot of which he wins with his trickery.
But I wouldn't base my judgement on a player on penalty taking ability.
Obviously not, but look at the direction you are taking this in.
Seems a bit familiar doesn't it FV.....
You are clearly trying to get Cal to respond to your bollocks about Ronaldo, which will spark off another little spastic unwinnable war between yourselves.
a good shot is unstoppable, that doesn't mean that every shot should be at goal and if it doesnt the shooter is shit
you are defining "good" for "goal" and is not like that
juan mata's penalty last sunday agains birminghan was very good taken, and 90 percent of the penaltys taken that way are goal, would you say that the penalty was bad because the goalie stopped it?
and if that's the case, then the other penalties taken the same way were badly taken although they end up scoring?
That can't be real? 10 penalties?? SO take away penalties and Ronaldo has 18 goals to Messis 25? So Messi missed one in the league so that means Barca have had 3 penalties whilst madrid have had 10? that's some stat.
Aslo Messi was taking penalties before Guardiola was the manager, so the idea that he's "indulging" him is a bit off.
suddenly someone points out that Messi is below average in an aspect of the game and FV wants to scratch penalties from goals records.
![]()
Alright alright, point taken, my reply was just to Marcos, i wasnt even aware of these stats.
Here's another look at probably the best performance of the season so far.
Okay, so let's just say Villa should take the penalties. Who cares? Why does this even matter?
Fair enough, I just wanted to nip it in the bud, more for Cal than you as I could see his hands rubbing together with delight at the mention of Naldo.
Just to be clear, I didn't mention who has a much better penalty record at all...![]()
Don't take the piss WR.
It's not about praise Cal. What difference does it make if his penalty taking isn't at the highest standard? The limit of this discussion should go like this:
- Messi isn't that great at penalties?
- You know, perhaps he isn't. Someone else should take them if they are better.
That's it. It's such a throwaway point at this junction. It's like Wayne Rooney, he can't take the best pens, but what should we do, debate it till the end of days or just accept that he takes them for some reason, right or wrong, that is unknown to us. What makes this a bit more pointless is that Messi is the freak he is, nearly every aspect of his game is exceptional, so who even cares about his penalty record? Even if he missed 10 out of 20, what difference does it really make, and where do you go from here? He can't take penalties with the best of them, accepted.
generally an excellent penalty taker
I'll leave it at that and leave you all to your Messi worshipping.
Right, but they've only lost one match where he's missed a penalty. Last time I checked, that equates to 3 points, not the total amount of points they are behind the leaders.
So, with that done and dusted. Let's move on.
I'm sorry if I don't find many things amazing about most saves off a dead ball from 12 yards. For as long as the taker does his job, you begin to understand the reason why its called a penalty.Very arrogant view specially when keepers (sometimes) pull off amazing saves.
Honestly at professional level, the keeper should have even less of a chance of saving a dead ball from 12 yards than at amateur level. I feel that is the reason those misses get so much headlines. It can be argued that keepers pull off mini miracles, so Koroux has a huge point.At an amateur level, yes. When the keepers arent as good you really shouldnt be missing. The keepers have no knowledge of where you are going to go etc. Much harder for a keeper. I play at a decent level and didnt miss my first pen til last season, was gutted.
At a professional level with all the dvds, videos and the quality of keepers, its certainly more acceptable to miss a penalty. Certainly isnt shameful.