The Athletic has confirmed that there is a clause in Haalands contract that gets activated a few years in to the contract and it's "more then 50 mil", so probably around 50-60mil, and that United (and Juve) rejected that clause. I hope now we can let the "he chose Germany/Dortmund/ rejected United" case to rest. It was United/Juve that pulled out, not the player rejecting the moves or preferring Dortmund.
We must never do business with this snake again.
EDIT: should he prove to be a huge success, in 2 or 3 years time Dortmund will be forced to sell for what will be a far lower price then his actual value. The snake is the only true winner here.
It's a win win :
1 Dortmund : Guaranteed 30M profit (Buy at 30, Release clause at 60)
Gets Haaland to play for them for a good few years, help them win games, increase his brand and their brand, develops the kids
Will definitely not got in Halaand's way if he wants a move (release clause)
Forced to sell at his lower value? Yes, but he's not dortmund to begin with. if not for this deal dormunt gets nothing, zilch
2. Halaand : Will get game time
Will get good salary, although less than at Juve or United
Will not be hold back if he wants to move when he's ready
Gets time and gets to play without pressure
3. Raiola : Forgone huge fee (I doubt Dortmund pays him alot this time) now
Expect Halaand to improve and sold later on (true, but it's capped at the release clause anyway, not like he can extort 100-200M for him)
Gets a club guarantee in a contract that his next move won't be stopped (release clause)
in 3 years time : dortmund got 30M and a good 3 years services, Halaand gets proper game time and now ready for his next big move, Raiola gets hit nice transfer fee.
Put it this way, Raiola lends you a player for 3 years, with a guaranteed profit for 30M, a great player to boot.
As for Raiola :
1. If he sells halaand to United now : It's 60M (6M assuming 10% fee), Contract extension in 3 years (3M) = 9M in 3 years
2. If he sells Halaand to dortmund now : It's 30M (3M assuming it's 10% fee), 60M in another 3 years (6M) = 9M in 3 years
just trying to see this objectively, a 60M release clause is a very fair value for a 30M purchase. Unless the Release clause is much less I don't see any unfairness to any party in here