League drafting thread

Which way do you prefer to proceed drafting

  • Snake after attackers round

    Votes: 7 36.8%

  • Continue with 3 picks per round

    Votes: 12 63.2%
  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Chesterlestreet said:
If you check the box, anyone you have included in the conversation can invite additional participants.
Click to expand...
But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
 
Swarm said:
But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
Click to expand...

Good question - it's an annoying feature.

But yes - I belive the limit can be exceeded that way.

What's particularly annoying is that you can't add people to the convo yourself, after having created it. At least I don't think so.
 
Swarm said:
Maybe the committe should make sure there is a communication channel set up for all participants to all members of the committe or clarify responsibilities so we know who to send to.
Click to expand...

Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.

Next guy to question the committee's methods would start with -1 points on the table :nono:

Please don't kick me out of the committee Pnut
 
GodShaveTheQueen said:
Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.

Next guy to question the committee's methods would start with -1 points on the table :nono:

Please don't kick me out of the committee Pnut
Click to expand...
Ye I guess you are right that people should take care themselves of sending their picks to as many committe members as possible. I did of course not mean to question the phantastic work that the committe is doing. Please kick him from the committee P-Nut!

Is there a deadline for @Jim Beam in place btw? It seems I am getting a bit addicted to these draft updates even though I can't say I have seen much success yet :lol:
 
GodShaveTheQueen said:
Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.
Click to expand...

Yeah, true.

Easiest way to do it might be to have everyone keep a main submissions conversation going with all committee members (adding those beyond the limit of 5 using the method mentioned above) - and then keep posting new submissions in said convo.

You get alerted every time a new post is made in an existing convo, unless you've mucked about with your settings/preferences.
 
What's the deadline for this round? Would have been quicker just doing snake
 
Btw, I fecked up yesterday - just realized that I posted the pick in a separate convo I started to include Ecstatic.

Anyway, fixed now. Unless instructed otherwise I'll keep posting picks in the same convo from now on.
 
Enigma_87 said:
By the looks of it not soon. Block list is getting bigger. :D
Click to expand...
Oh ffs. I already hate Isotope and Sjor for simply getting their picks the first time around. And how the feck did @MJJ get Schmeichel as his third option? :wenger:
 
You could consider operating with short deadlines for the snake, it's a big squad to fill, after all.

Just allow people who don't pick on time to do so at their earliest convenience.
 
Swarm said:
But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
Click to expand...
Spam prevention. If a newly registered member sends you and 5 other members some random spam info, you won't include other members in, will you?
 
GK Round 2
Round 1 GKs

Physiocrat: 1) P. Jennings* (Blocked) 2) G. Pagliuca (Blocked)
Michealf: 1) L. Mazurkiewicz* 2) H. Schumacher
Harms: 1) J-M Pfaff* (Blocked) 2) G. Pagliuca (Blocked) 3) R. Zamora
Skizzo: 1) J-M Pfaff* (Blocked) 2. P. Jennings (Blocked) 3) R. Hellström
Indy: 2) S. Canizares 3) G. Grosics (Blocked)
Stobzilla: 1) J. Campos* 2) F. Barthez 3) V. Valdes
Chester: 1) P. Jennings* (Blocked)
MJJ: 1) P. Jennings* (Blocked) 2) M. Preud'homme (Blocked)
Swarm: 1) P. Jennings* (Blocked) 2) A. Kopke
BeforeKeaneRobson: 1) W. Zenga (Blocked)* 2) M. Preud'homme 3)Gilmar
2mufc0: 1) W. Zenga (Blocked)* 2) J-M Pfaff (Blocked) 3) M. Preud'homme (Blocked)
Jim Beam: 1) G. Grosics 3) M. Preud'homme (Blocked)
cubemine: 1) J. Lehmann* 2) P. Cech


1: Indnyc - 1) G. Banks 2) S. Canizares
2: Sjor Bepo - 1) O. Kahn 2) M-A ter Stegen 3) Ederson
3: 2mufc0 -
4: Swarm - 1) J. Oblak 2) A. Kopke
5: MJJ - 1) P. Schmeichel
6: Michaelf777 - 1) I. Casillas 2) L. Mazurkiewicz 3) H. Schumacher
7: Jim Beam - 1) G. Grosics 2) V. Beara
8: harms - 2) R. Zamora
9: Skizzo - 3) R. Hellstrom
10: cubemine - 1) K. Navas 2) J. Lehmann 3. P. Cech
11: Isotope - 1) S. Maier 2) A. Peruzzi 3) J. Croy
12: Physiocrat - 1) F. Toldo
13: Chesterlestreet - 1) U. Fillol 2) A. Zubizarreta
14: Stobzilla - 1) J. Campos 2) F. Barthez 3) V. Valdes
15: BeforeKeanetherewasRobson - 2) Gilmar


Blocked List: J.L. Chilavert, M. Neuer, G. Buffon, E. van der Sar, P. Shilton, D. Zoff, L. Yashin, R. Dasayev, G. Pagliuca, J-M Pfaff, P. Jennings, M. Preud'homme, W. Zenga
 
Last edited:
Jim Beam said:
The keeper for whom Yashin said it is the best he ever seen? Goes in my favorite 11 of all time. :p

Anyway, you won't believe it. I sent my picks.
Click to expand...

You are lucky I am not playing. Or we would have blocked each other :lol:
 
Sent
 
Status
Not open for further replies.