You may have had problems but it's a very well known fact that macs have a better rate of reliability than windows PC's.
Not true
ASUS best, HP worst for notebook reliability | Electronista
You may have had problems but it's a very well known fact that macs have a better rate of reliability than windows PC's.
You may have had problems but it's a very well known fact that macs have a better rate of reliability than windows PC's.
Hi guys, I'm going to jump in on this topic for some help of my own.
Hi guys, I'm going to jump in on this topic for some help of my own.
My laptop has just broken (well it still functions, but I can't close the monitor down), and as it's about 3 1/2 years old now I've decided to ask for a new one for Christmas. The budget would probably be around the same as the OP's (£550 ish) although I can go higher if needed.
My laptop does get heavy usage as I'm a student, but nothing too strenuous (just lots of browsing, Uni work etc) and I like to play the odd game on it, Football Manager etc. But the most important thing is that it can last for a while - I treat my laptops well, but I don't want it turning into a paperweight within 24 months. Oh, I'd prefer it if it was pretty quiet because I'll probably be taking it to the library during exams, and I don't want a 15.6' screen because they're too small.
If anyone could help it would be fantastic, I'm looking myself too but I'm not too aware of what should be avoided, what's a bargain etc. Thanks!
Because there are companies that make shit laptops.
You are taking the brand from one company and then comparing it to the entire market.
How does mac compare to thinkpads for example? That's a fairer frame of comparison.
I was in a similar situation earlier this year and I decided I really wanted a thinkpad. They are known to have excellent build quality and longevity and to be the brand of choice in the corporate sector. I also wanted a small one I could take with me everywhere.
Trouble is they don't come cheap. The X201 satisfied pretty much all my needs, but it came at a cost of £1500, a fair bit out of my price range.
What I did was spend a fair bit of time on ebay trying to find a trusted seller who sold one. I got a new unused Thinkpad X201 with full warranty and all for £700, less than half the price it was sold in at the stores. You can get some really good deals for quality laptops there if you're willing to do the research to avoid shams.
I was in a similar situation earlier this year and I decided I really wanted a thinkpad. They are known to have excellent build quality and longevity and to be the brand of choice in the corporate sector. I also wanted a small one I could take with me everywhere.
Trouble is they don't come cheap. The X201 satisfied pretty much all my needs, but it came at a cost of £1500, a fair bit out of my price range.
What I did was spend a fair bit of time on ebay trying to find a trusted seller who sold one. I got a new unused Thinkpad X201 with full warranty and all for £700, less than half the price it was sold in at the stores. You can get some really good deals for quality laptops there if you're willing to do the research to avoid shams.
Definitely and that's my problem with the mac hating brigade, because you mention price so often. Buy a cheap PC because you think mac are expensive and you'll get what you paid for, buy an expensive PC and well done, right choice, but stop mentioning the price difference so often.
The fact is, to get a PC as good an reliable as a Mac, it really does have to be top end, and that doesn't come cheap.
Thinkpads are great, but you need to spend about a £1000 on one if you want it to match up to a macbook pro , and then.... well, it looks like shit doesn't it.
Good price you got on that too. It's an ugly little thing though, but looks aren't important, I'd say they are definitely the best windows laptops you can buy.
US price comparison done in April:
Macbook Pro: $2649 ($3029)
Core i7-2820QM, 2.3 GHz Quad
4GB Ram (8gb, $90)
500gb sata @ 7200 rpm (120gb ocz vertex 3, 120gb, $290)
1680x1050 display
Thinkpad T520: $1884 ($2264)
Core i7-2820QM, 2.3 GHz Quad
2GB Ram (8gb, $90)
250gb sata @ 5400 rpm (120gb ocz vertex 3, 120gb, $290)
1920x1080 display
Numbers in brackets are if you buy hdd/ram upgrades yourself and install them, to save money. So if you're upgrading to 8gb ram and the fastest available SSD, you'd get a better screen with the thinkpad, and save $800
It's a man's computer. No curves, no gloss.
Shit, good point.
Now I'm feeling all gay![]()
Cheers Vidic! Good stuff.
My work is giving me a Dell E6420...is that any good?
What can it do and how do I keep my porn secret on it?
Yeah one of the best laptops money can buy.
At least it was in 2002.
true. And mine is more recent
PC World's "Reliability and Service Survey" Finds Apple Best in Quality | | The Mac Lawyer
I don't understand why the thinkpads need to be so ugly. They have't updated the design since the 00's.
How do you abuse a hinge....call it a bender?
Well that's my point proven basically, to buy a Windows laptop that matches up you're gonna be paying around £1500.
And then it's much uglier
![]()
![]()
Personal taste of course. I mean, some people think Sofía Vergara is the sexiest woman ever to walk the earth.
These might be better (much quicker processor):My Mrs is thinking about buying one of these for her daughter:
PACKARD BELL EasyNote TK85 051 15.6" Laptop buy online | Currys
Seems decent to me but I'm no expert. Can anyone point me in the direction of a better machine/deal for a similar price?
There aren't enough AMD A4 reviews out there to compare, really. The A4 in theory offers better graphics but the i3-2310M shits all over the A4 in raw processing speed.Big Mac/Windows debate, 2 thread hijacks, 3 pages & I'm no closer to deciding what laptop to choose.
x43455565bn12, you knows ye stuff don't you? Out of the two HP's which would you recommend? One with better processor, or one with more memory/bigger hard drive?
There aren't enough AMD A4 reviews out there to compare, really. The A4 in theory offers better graphics but the i3-2310M shits all over the A4 in raw processing speed.
For now, I'd be tempted to go for the i3-2310M if you are unwilling to wait for a month or so for reviews to come out for the AMD A4 series.
The A4's graphics should be better, but the processing speed of the i3 is miles better. So it depends on what you really need (what type of games).I see, so the A4 might not be too far off it? The price they're both down to it makes no difference which I go for, but the original prices are quite a way apart, which is whats thrown me a bit.
What about the memory/hard drive difference?
The A4's graphics should be better, but the processing speed of the i3 is miles better. So it depends on what you really need (what type of games).
The RAM doesn't really make a difference... 4 GB is enough for most people.
These might be better (much quicker processor):
Acer Aspire 5749 LX.RR702.011
Lenovo B570 M58FGUK
Lenovo G570 M5174UK
It would come down to build quality... Go ahead and Google the model numbers for reviews. And remember that these companies often have different configurations (i.e. more RAM, or the odd graphics card swap), so be careful when comparing performance.
Yes, they only have 4 GB of RAM, but you usually don't need more than that unless you are into heavy gaming, heavy multi-tasking or multimedia creation/editing.