It would be the first time Lancs have won the County Championship outright since 1934!
Come on Lanky!
I must say, my thread is of outstanding quality and beats this one handsdown. I'll be at the Oval next week. A win, wins us the title.
Shitty summer has fecked over my Lancs watching this year, only got a few games. In fact I saw England at OT for almost as many days as Lancs
Still, great position, deserve to be top only losing one game all season, who knows with better weather this might have been all over by now
This country really ought to do something about its climate...
Don't think any of us have seen Lancs win the title. Now won it since 1934.
That's fecked up.
Don't think that's been through a lack of quality we have had over the years.
I always managed to come up with Manchester weather as an excuse (too many wash outs). Last few years I've blamed Mushtaq Ahmed at Sussex.
I'd like to see a comparison with other counties. Not sure that actually holds up, to be honest.
Read it. Lancs, Yorks, Glamorgan, Durham and Warwickshire have very similar rainfall throughout the summer, though. So, on the face of it, I don't think it holds up. . .as an excuse. Generally, the Westsiiiide is England's wettest. I think Cardiff and Plymouth have the highest rainfall on average throughout the year.
The latest forecast for The Oval next week is:
Wednesday: Cloudy
Thursday: Sunny intervals
Friday: Light Rain
Saturday's not forecasted yet. Fingers crossed it stays dry.
Lancs are further north, which means later sunsets during the cricket season. So maybe they have an advantage over Surrey when it comes to closing early for bad light. Also, the Oval is pretty good for batting and drawn matches, whereas perhaps Old Trafford produces more rain-affected wickets and more results. I've no data to point to, though.
Well I'm no weatherman (although I have met Diane Oxbury and a fine figure of a woman she is too), but I thought the south wast got the most sun (Cornwall's the sunniest county apparently). Wettest place is Borrowdale in the Lakes - in the North West.
But on the whole I'd agree, in those 70 years we've had more than enough chances to win it - last year we WERE fecked by the weather, but we were also fecked over by ultra-conservative captaincy.
Rainfall in England varies widely. The Lake District is the wettest part, with average annual totals exceeding 2,000 mm (this is comparable with that in the western Highlands of Scotland). The Pennines and the moors of south-west England are almost as wet. However, all of East Anglia, much of the Midlands, eastern and north-eastern England, and parts of the south-east receive less than 700 mm a year.
Typically, it rains on about one day in three in England, perhaps somewhat more often in winter, though long, dry spells occur in most years.
Near the south coast there is an appreciable summer minimum and winter maximum of rainfall, with totals in July barely half those in January; western, northern and eastern coasts are more likely to see the driest month in spring and the wettest in late autumn. Inland, parts of the Midlands experience a summer rainfall maximum, which is a reflection of the higher frequency of thunderstorms in the more central and south-eastern parts of England. For example, at London and Birmingham, thunder occurs on an average of 15 days a year, but in the west and north-west the frequency declines to around eight days per year.
Facts and figures
Maximum in a day (09-09 UTC): 279 mm at Martinstown (Dorset) on 18 July 1955.
Rainfall graph
We're useless.
74 years.
I'm not having that
I'm blaming Mushtaq Ahmed again, he's the guy most resposible for us not winning the last few seasons.
How spastic are Pakistan not playing him?