He's not been good tonight?What happened to De Jong? Struggling to settle or something?
He's been alright but nothing special imo. Useful I'd sayHe's not been good tonight?
They never played as badly as this for starters.How these clowns won Laliga in the last few seasons shows have far the league has falled.
Messi. That's about it. He's carrying this team levels above where they actually are.How these clowns won Laliga in the last few seasons shows have far the league has falled.
ThanksHe's been alright but nothing special imo. Useful I'd say
We sucked great hairy ass, atletico are the ultimate pretenders, and they have Messi. Which after a decade of dominance is enough to cow 90% of spanish sides into submission with his presence aloneHow these clowns won Laliga in the last few seasons shows have far the league has falled.
He keeps the ball moving, he rarely loses it. If you've seen how he was used at Gremio and is for Brazil, you'd know he had/has more freedom to be creative there (he's more restricted at Barca because Valverde). He controls the rhythm. Not seeing anyone who does it as well as him currently on the pitch.Said it before but Arthur plays it too safe.
The one thing he has is his incredible ability to resist pressing opposition, but now that they have de Jong who's not only as good as him at resisting the press, but better in every other department, too, I'm not surprised he's finding game time hard. Then you have Busquets who's Busquets. (Yeah, I know he's not playing)
I hope it continues, he gets restless, and we pounce (As if, though! )
Imagine that they sack him tomorrow,who would you like? Xavi?
What's the point of Griezmann? Why is he worth over 100 million? He looks pointless.
because it's the most competitive league in the worldWhats up with the top sides in La Liga? Not watching, but all of the top 3 are dropping more points than they usually do..
Said this from day one but posters had him in a false 9 role salivating over a fantasy line up.if Griez is going to play so far from the box, they shouldn't use him at all.
Sounds just like their other two +100m signings.What's the point of Griezmann? Why is he worth over 100 million? He looks pointless.
Don't get me wrong - I love him as a player, and would love him here. It's just, with Busquets and De Jong, they already have two CMs who like to control the rhythm, and, imo, they have more tools in their arsenal in addition to being able to do so than Arthur, so I can see why they're preferred. Then, for balance, you want a CM who's more proactive in the final third than Arthur - who occupies the same areas De Jong and Busquets do - like a Vidal just to compliment eachothers strengths.He keeps the ball moving, he rarely loses it. If you've seen how he was used at Gremio and is for Brazil, you'd know he had/has more freedom to be creative there (he's more restricted at Barca because Valverde). He controls the rhythm. Not seeing anyone who does it as well as him currently on the pitch.
110 goals in his last 6 seasons in La Liga.What's the point of Griezmann? Why is he worth over 100 million? He looks pointless.
What happened to De Jong? Struggling to settle or something?
We'd take Longstaff over Arthur.Said it before but Arthur plays it too safe.
The one thing he has is his incredible ability to resist pressing opposition, but now that they have de Jong who's not only as good as him at resisting the press, but better in every other department, too, I'm not surprised he's finding game time hard. Then you have Busquets who's Busquets. (Yeah, I know he's not playing)
I hope it continues, he gets restless, and we pounce (As if, though! )
110 goals in his last 6 seasons in La Liga.
So that's what, 1 in 3?110 goals in his last 6 seasons in La Liga.
Not true. Arthur plays conservatively for barcelona for some reason but he actually has good penetrative passing, a good shot and can get into the box. He's a much more attacking player than De Jong or BusquetsDon't get me wrong - I love him as a player, and would love him here. It's just, with Busquets and De Jong, they already have two CMs who like to control the rhythm, and, imo, they have more tools in their arsenal in addition to being able to do so than Arthur, so I can see why they're preferred. Then, for balance, you want a CM who's more proactive in the final third than Arthur - who occupies the same areas De Jong and Busquets do - like a Vidal just to compliment eachothers strengths.
I say this as someone who much prefers Arthur over Vidal, too. In fact, I've never been a big fan of Vidal's.
That's what i'm saying, Arthur has the tools to be used in a more attacking position. Just that Valverde wants safety first, it is literally just the managers tactical instructions that is hindering Arthur from being able to do more in attack.Don't get me wrong - I love him as a player, and would love him here. It's just, with Busquets and De Jong, they already have two CMs who like to control the rhythm, and, imo, they have more tools in their arsenal in addition to being able to do so than Arthur, so I can see why they're preferred. Then, for balance, you want a CM who's more proactive in the final third than Arthur - who occupies the same areas De Jong and Busquets do - like a Vidal just to compliment eachothers strengths.
I say this as someone who much prefers Arthur over Vidal, too. In fact, I've never been a big fan of Vidal's.
38*6 = 228So that's what, 1 in 3?
I think Busquets is the one who conflicts more with Arthur's style than De Jong. De Jong can play as that CM in the final third, and should be for this Barcelona, while I think Arthur is a step above in terms of pure ball retention. Barca should be building off him controlling the play from deep and playing balls higher up to De Jong, who can run at the defense and is more threatening in front of goal.Don't get me wrong - I love him as a player, and would love him here. It's just, with Busquets and De Jong, they already have two CMs who like to control the rhythm, and, imo, they have more tools in their arsenal in addition to being able to do so than Arthur, so I can see why they're preferred. Then, for balance, you want a CM who's more proactive in the final third than Arthur - who occupies the same areas De Jong and Busquets do - like a Vidal just to compliment eachothers strengths.
I say this as someone who much prefers Arthur over Vidal, too. In fact, I've never been a big fan of Vidal's.
So that's what, 1 in 3?
110 in 215 appearancesSo that's what, 1 in 3?
pointless.From Wiki - He made 257 appearances for Atletico, scoring 133 goals.
Which is a good return considering their style of play.
Other way around. De Jong is a natural #5, arthur a #6/#8I think Busquets is the one who conflicts more with Arthur's style than De Jong. De Jong can play as that CM in the final third, and should be for this Barcelona, while I think Arthur is a step above in terms of pure ball retention. Barca should be building off him controlling the play from deep and playing balls higher up to De Jong, who can run at the defense and is more threatening in front of goal.
Maybe it's from mainly seeing Arthur with Barca but I thought De Jong was a good attacking player as well? Remember him being quite threatening with his runs forward with AjaxNot true. Arthur plays conservatively for barcelona for some reason but he actually has good penetrative passing, a good shot and can get into the box. He's a much more attacking player than De Jong or Busquets
And as to Busquets, they really can't get away with using him as a starter anymore. He'd still be good in most games, but if they get used to playing with him then once they face the likes of dortmund or liverpool in CL, they either have to shift to a lineup they're not used to or play him anyways, and he's a liability against the real top teams
They don't have another number 9That's actually quite good. Guess Valverde is kind of miss using him on the wing then? This whole Barca side looks rubbish honestly. How is Suarez still allowed to play. He used to be a world class cnut. Now he's just a cnut.