Nice try but his victims aren’t the ones on trial here.
Kyle Rittenhouse | Now crowdfunding LOLsuits against Whoopi Goldberg, LeBron James, and The Young Turks
- Thread starter Drainy
- Start date
But it would you make biased against a person, if he turned out to have been convicted of raping small kids as a opposed to a law abiding respectable person. Just like Kyle Rittenhouse making white power signs with the proud boys makes you dislike him.
Irrelevant since it is Rittenhouse on trial. Not Rosenbaum.
Is rosenbaum the guy who raped boys or the guy who beat his partner
You know which, you just wanted to say that other thing.
Keep batting for these fine people
Keep batting for these fine people
Pointing out that you didn't actually ask a question isn't batting for anyone. For instance, I could do something like this: Are you the guy who wants politicians to be stabbed to death?
That's not a real question. I'm not asking anything, I'm pointing out that you are in fact that guy. The question is just a rhetorical device, just like how you wanted to apropos of nothing point out irrelevantly that someone hit their partner. You just disguised it behind a question.
fair play for parsing the point of something pretty obvious but I didn't need the explanation. Anyway I'm not looking to get dogpiled like Drainy so I'll leave this thread chums
Two bats for Proud Buy Rittenhouse and you're out already.
Wumming WUM surprised that he wound some people up.
ooh the proud boys. terrifying.
Always nice to have the fash apologists out in the open.
They just can’t help themselves, can they?
Jeff is usually a bit more opaque about it, but I guess it's hard to keep it up every day.
I think it's because he thinks he's got like minded companions here.
@Drainy you should let him know that you're not right wing and you're only interested in the self defence aspect of this, he's getting a bit obvious
the cavalry have arrived and they've brought fash chud dunks
Are you having a stroke?
Good night then
You could just save time and find somewhere else to own the libs now rather than trying to get banned here first.
Keep it up mate, definitely smashing it in this thread. Definitely not bombing.
This thread is making me anxious, I have to admit. Every day I normally wake up and check the caf' and its no notifications so I get to enjoy the football threads, but recently I've been dreading what I'm coming back to.
NotThatSoph's posts are like this drop kick to my face
Nevermind Rittenhouse, I have PTSD from this thread
Come on now.
your partisan responses as an admin joining in on the dogpiling that awaits the one guy who makes the counter argument really helps the tone on this forum mate.
This is exactly my take on it, but you phrased it better than I could have done. I think if he's going to be found guilty for any of the other charges, it would be the one for shooting at (and missing) the guy who kicked him and ran off. The guy was running away so it's harder to argue self defence. Although I haven't seen the video for quite a while.
Definitely though he should have been charged with something less than murder. He's at fault, but not guilty of murder, in my humblest of opinions.
Who says I have to be partisan? I post on here just like everyone else and I’m allowed opinions. It’s not dogpiling.
Also rich to be told I don’t help the tone of the forum by the guy who said someone deserved to be stabbed.
I'm not victimising myself bc idc that i got banned or that people will relentlessly quote me
but its quite funny that you've chugged so much liberal diarrhea that you'll go quoting drainy every day for daring to go the other side of an argument that the caf is otherwise lockstep onthe best part is when all the kyle kulinski quote tweeters roll in now to say they're not an echo chamber
I'm not victimising myself bc idc that i got banned or that people will relentlessly quote me
the best part is when all the kyle kulinski quote tweeters roll in now to say they're not an echo chamber
Yeah that’s the only reason.
It's called a conversation. We all make points, then others counter argue, then we discuss the nuances. @Drainy has a lot of respect because he tries to make logical, thought out posts.I'm not victimising myself bc idc that i got banned or that people will relentlessly quote me
the best part is when all the kyle kulinski quote tweeters roll in now to say they're not an echo chamber
Sometimes fail, I have to admit! Outmatched in debate technique by some posters. Nothing if not persistent though.
Everyone's human, but, but seriously, I have enjoyed this debate, even if it has got a bit spicy at times.Sometimes fail, I have to admit! Outmatched in debate technique by some posters. Nothing if not persistent though.
if you think the caf is anything but a lib-chapo echo chamber you're living in cloud cuckoo land
Oh okay.
I'm not victimising myself bc idc that i got banned or that people will relentlessly quote me
the best part is when all the kyle kulinski quote tweeters roll in now to say they're not an echo chamber
you forgot the kyle kulinski tweets buddyOh okay.
Could you maybe offer an opinion on the actual subject of the thread, or you know, sod off somewhere else?
Thanks.
First of all, what the feck does that mean?
Secondly, you're in a thread where there has been 21 pages of back and forth discussion, a lot of it from Drainy, to give us a different perspective. I'm fairly sure @Drainy hasn't been insulted for his opinions, but has been called out when he's overstepped the mark, like the proud boys thing, and he's been man enough to admit his mistakes and has genuinely tried to answer the questions directed at him.
I would prefer posters to be like Drainy, so we can have detailed discussion, rather than muppets who come here to wum.
Its not an echo chamber, its just that the majority of hard right wingers on this forum are mouth breathers. I'd welcome anybody who can actually debate.
Oh no another dog added to the pile. Hope he copes ok.