Seems like it resulted in the death of 2 people, injury to another and a potential life in prison for the armed person.
Kyle Rittenhouse | Now crowdfunding LOLsuits against Whoopi Goldberg, LeBron James, and The Young Turks
- Thread starter Drainy
- Start date
Seems like it resulted in the death of 2 people, injury to another and a potential life in prison for the armed person.
Agreed. Looks so incredibly fake.
Wisconsin allows open carry of handguns, too.
With some of that onus on deceased unfortunately. The 1st especially. 2nd not so much.
It seems incredible to me that an inexperienced youngster invited himself to an emotionally charged situation with a killing weapon and when people get killed, onus seems to be on deceased.
If you threaten kill the guy with the assault rifle and then chase him down and grab after the assault rifle there is some onus on that guy yeah.
Poor kid, I can't imagine the burden of being a murderer at that age.
If only he had found a way not to shoot people with an assault rifle.
Wow great performance 10/10, even better than @Drainy pretending to be objective. Some strong candidates in the Oscars this year!
almost as good as the prosecutor giving multiple grounds for a mistrial and pretending he didn't realise it would be a problem, yeh?
You don’t help yourself do you?
He's commented on a defendants 5th amendment rights to draw a negative inference - a constitutional violation
He's attempted to blindside irrelevant and provisionally barred evidence in front of the jury without permission from the judge.
What are you on about? The judge has reemed him out and has threatened sanctions if he does it again.
I’m laughing at you dropping your mask and jumping to his defence once again.
Forget the technicalities, are you not disgusted by his actions here that lead to 4 people dying?
He's not coming across as credible at all based on those clips.
He would need a lot more context to go as far as being disgusted.
Was what I said untrue?
I've stated my position and I won't repeat it for you. feck off.
Obviously.
But the act of someone trying to take a deadly weapon away from a carrier shouldn’t allow for deadly force to be used in return over a hypothetical scenario that may or may not play out. That’s insane to me.
This judge is crooked and this case is rigged in favor of Shittenhouse.
Would you give the guy who threatened to kill you if he cornered you alone the benefit of the doubt once he took your rifle? I frankly don't see what so insane about it, especially seeing how unhinged Rosenbaum was. Without looking past the fact the Rittenhouse is a cretin as well.
A massive deterrent for what?
A concealed handgun isn’t going to draw the same level of attention as an big feck off assault rifle. Secondly, if he was there, as he claimed, to offer medical assistance and clean up graffiti, then why would you need an assault rifle?
surely a handgun, concealed or otherwise, is enough. Carrying an assault rifle is undoubtedly going to bring attention and with that attention a level of unpredictability.
Seems he's still upset.It didn't even take a single person doing that to set him off.
Don't, hypotheticals confuse @Drainy
I'm sure Kyle will have answered this sometime during his testimony.
Yeah apparently it looked cool.
So whatever happens it looks like there is going to be an appeal
No he said that he believed that he would not be able to possess a handgun, but there was an exception for long barrelled rifles and choosing between a shotgun or a AR-15 and thought the AR-15 was cooler.
Motion to dismiss with prejudice is being lodged at the moment for prosecutorial overreach and breach of constitutional rights.
He had an entire spiel about training with the local firefighters and when asked if he packed any medical supplies on the night of, he said “yeah, one roll of gauze”
THE JUDGE HAS JUST CALLED THE PROSECUTOR A LIAR
This whole trial stinks of a sandbagged case in order to bring about civil unrest. The alt-rght have a quasi evangelical side and likely view civil war as the only means of getting the country back now. This kind of result will potentially give them the opportunity.
I would have chosen a bazooka.
The bit about the curfew, none of the owners asking him personally to defend their property were also gold.
Wow! The same judge that said the people Rittenhouse killed cannot be called “victims”? The same judge that allowed said victims to be referred to as “rioters” or “looters”? No way.
What about curfew?
No, we as being asked about why he thought it was ok to breach the 5th amendment and court rulings and he tried getting off the hook. The judge said 'I don't believe you' because he was clearly lying in bad faith.
Easy. Don't trigger him.