mu4c_20le
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 46,746
Unless cheating bastards in 1st place get their titles strippedIn the words of Liverpool’s own most vaunted legends, 2nd is nowhere
Unless cheating bastards in 1st place get their titles strippedIn the words of Liverpool’s own most vaunted legends, 2nd is nowhere
Well, 11 leagues in 15 yrs in three different countries puts Pep at the top by some distance no matter the money situation. He’s never been put in a position that Klopp was in as far as the size of clubs or finances but you have to be a brilliant mgr to have accomplished what he has done in such a short amount of time. Building a team with limited resources I would take Klopp over anyone in the game. Building an established team with huge finances I would take Pep over any mgr in history.He really hasnt, its unbelievable how over-rated a manager who has never worked in a job where he actually has to manage the players he has got rather than having a virtually unlimited budget to buy any new player he wants is.
Pep has surpassed anyone who’s ever coached at this point. I don’t think SAF would be able to coach in this day and age with the way players are now with salaries, agents and the like. It’s a new sport and the Peps and Klopps of the world know how to deal with it.
Pep has surpassed anyone who’s ever coached at this point. I don’t think SAF would be able to coach in this day and age with the way players are now with salaries, agents and the like. It’s a new sport and the Peps and Klopps of the world know how to deal with it.
Pep has surpassed anyone who’s ever coached at this point. I don’t think SAF would be able to coach in this day and age with the way players are now with salaries, agents and the like. It’s a new sport and the Peps and Klopps of the world know how to deal with it.
The confidence with which this nonsense is said is truly remarkable. Or just a troll.
Is this based on SAF managing for only 26 years and rebuilding the squad time and again? You think dealing with Keane and dealing with Ronaldo was the same thing?
Yeah because players salaries and agents were invented in 2015.Pep has surpassed anyone who’s ever coached at this point. I don’t think SAF would be able to coach in this day and age with the way players are now with salaries, agents and the like. It’s a new sport and the Peps and Klopps of the world know how to deal with it.
Definitely. SAF changed a lot and all the stuff said about modern day players was said about the players of 10 years ago and 10 years before that. It's the same old "kids these days" bollix.
Moreover, Pep has rarely had to manage a strong personality. The one time I can think of was Zlatan and we know how that went. Ironically, he fecked off Eto'o for Zlatan, and even Eto'o has some interesting things to say about Pep's man management skills.
How do you define strong personality
If we acknowledge that City cheated he'd have 3 titles, getting 90 plus points usually gets you a title too. Second with 97 points is not terrible.His PL finishes :
8th
4th
4th
2nd
1st
3rd
2nd
5th
A good manager but terribly overrated.
Liverpool fans and the media are acting like they're losing Fergusons equal.
Trying again as original reply got mish-mashed.How has Mourinho achieved more? While managing Chelsea, he never made them the best in Europe. His goal was to win the league and the Champions League. He only achieved one of these targets. Klopp achieved both of them, therefore Klopp built a team that reached a higher level than Mourinho did while in charge of a premier league side.
Yes, point totals, net spend and all that is white noise... It's fair context, if you want, but even ignoring them and looking at the facts - Mourinho didn't achieve all his targets while in charge of an English club, while Klopp did. I'm sure Mourinho would trade away his 2 extra league titles for a champions league title with Chelsea, because that means he'd have "completed" all his targets while in charge of an English club.
Looking at their run, they knocked out both Barca and Bayern in their path to the final. Barca finished 19 points ahead of Real Madrid that year.
Of course you need luck to win it. But the best managers who achieve the best things, get over the line in both the champions league and the league. It's not even winning it in the same season, it's simply building a team who has done both. It's a tiny list of managers because it's an extremely hard thing to do which only the very best sides throughout English football history have done.
Tier 1
Ferguson
Guardiola
Tier 2
Wenger
Mourinho
Klopp
In my opinion. I don't think there's much to separate tier 2 - Wenger's got longevity, mourinho's got the trophies and Klopp the story. They're all missing something too - Wenger European success, Klopp the multiple trophies and Mourinho's penalised for style.
Klopp has spent huge money and an established team, you’re just comparing it to state owned finances.Well, 11 leagues in 15 yrs in three different countries puts Pep at the top by some distance no matter the money situation. He’s never been put in a position that Klopp was in as far as the size of clubs or finances but you have to be a brilliant mgr to have accomplished what he has done in such a short amount of time. Building a team with limited resources I would take Klopp over anyone in the game. Building an established team with huge finances I would take Pep over any mgr in history.
I’d say Jose is missing the Champions League success with an English club as well.
No it’s not. It’s exactly the same. It’s second place.Alas, Runner up with a single point gap from the winner is a wee bit different from runner up with a 15 point gap.
What about beating Bayern Munich, Barcelona and coming through a group with Napoli & PSG?
We had an easier run to the final in 21/22 and 17/18.
No it’s not. It’s exactly the same. It’s second place.
It's less comparable, given we're living in an era of City's unpunished cheating. Guardiola has an asterisk next to his achievements over the last decade, and so Klopp has performed better than the 1 title (so far) suggests. I'd put him clearly above all of those managers, probably slightly below Wenger, given the greater impact the latter had on the wider league.I have hard time reading things like that. Sure, very good or great manager, but he only won one Premier League. That is same as Ranieri, Pellegrini, Conte, Dalglish, Ancelotti and Mancini. Mourinho and Wenger have 3 each, Guardiola have 5 and Ferguson got 13.
If Fergie was managing today, he'd dominate just like before.Pep has surpassed anyone who’s ever coached at this point. I don’t think SAF would be able to coach in this day and age with the way players are now with salaries, agents and the like. It’s a new sport and the Peps and Klopps of the world know how to deal with it.
Right, right. Ferguson really put the fear of god in him.If Fergie was managing today, he'd dominate just like before.
Guardiola wouldn't even have come to England as he's a coward of a manager.
It's less comparable, given we're living in an era of City's unpunished cheating. Guardiola has an asterisk next to his achievements over the last decade, and so Klopp has performed better than the 1 title (so far) suggests. I'd put him clearly above all of those managers, probably slightly below Wenger, given the greater impact the latter had on the wider league.
He was even offered the chance to follow the great man but shat himself at the thought.Right, right. Ferguson really put the fear of god in him.
Was thinking about this recently, he went for that meeting in New York knowing full well that he was going to City and Txiki Begiristain had already moved to City ahead of him. I’m 99% sure he would have gone to that meeting with City’s knowledge and blessing encouraged to find out what SAF’s plans were.He was even offered the chance to follow the great man but shat himself at the thought.
Was thinking about this recently, he went for that meeting in New York knowing full well that he was going to City and Txiki Begiristain had already moved to City ahead of him. I’m 99% sure he would have gone to that meeting with City’s knowledge and blessing encouraged to find out what SAF’s plans were.
He's a very good manager. He also spent a lot of money. He had success, somewhat limited. His reputation exceeds what he's actually done in the game. I don't know what's hard to comprehend about that, it's pretty straightforward.Not quite what I was eluding to. Liverpool were broadly a nothing club with a fluke Champions league in 2005 before him. He went in, spent a fraction of what Pep did (?) and won the CL in less time, whilst also winning their first ever PL. He also pushed Pep all the way despite having fewer resources 3 times. It's not just about what he won, but how he had Liverpool playing and how efficient he was. The points tally even in the seasons he came just short was insane.
He rebuilt the squad which was much needed after last year and would be unbeaten if not for that dubious Spurs loss earlier this season. All whilst grappling big personal losses.
So yeah, he's pretty good. I regard him as the best manager in the world and am quite sure Pep wouldn't achieve the same at Liverpool if the money hose were swapped. I don't think Klopp is overrated.
Every year have it own difficulties. Don’t think for second that when those managers and teams won the league that it was easy. Wenger performed better than 3 trophies. So did Mourinho. That doesn’t mean much if there is better team or manager on the other side.It's less comparable, given we're living in an era of City's unpunished cheating. Guardiola has an asterisk next to his achievements over the last decade, and so Klopp has performed better than the 1 title (so far) suggests. I'd put him clearly above all of those managers, probably slightly below Wenger, given the greater impact the latter had on the wider league.
His points tallies don't though. My argument is why he's the best manager in the world. Not whether he could have won more during his time at Liverpool. They are mutually exclusive given he was the only manager to consistently go toe to toe with a club which essentially cheated over an extended period.He's a very good manager. He also spent a lot of money. He had success, somewhat limited. His reputation exceeds what he's actually done in the game. I don't know what's hard to comprehend about that, it's pretty straightforward.
Also, points tallies mean absolutely nothing.
He isn't. Pep is.My argument is why he's the best manager in the world
8.5 years.
7 major honours? I only see it as 4
1 league.
1 fa cup.
1 league cup.
1 champions league.
Are we really going to count the charity shield, super cup or club world?
I think Klopp is a brilliant manager but the stats do not back up his rating to be up with Pep and Fergie or even Wenger. Mourinho has been much more successful.
Big blow to Liverpool he’s a big character and plays great football.
Did Fergie not have to deal with the exact same thing with Chelsea?The ONLY reason his stats doesn't match up is because of a certain oil doped club under Pep. If it was a more fair fight he would have more titles at Liverpool.
Did Fergie not have to deal with the exact same thing with Chelsea?
No chance, Pep has never taken a challenge quite like Liverpool or Dortmund and would need a blank chequebook to transcend a team.He isn't. Pep is.
It is really hard to argue against Pep.He isn't. Pep is.