Khvicha Kvaratskhelia

I have watched a lot of him and, must admit, do not see some of what you see.

You are 100% highlighting his dribbling and ball-carrying. He is very technical, but

1. Dribblers and technical players have traditionally not necessarily been successful in England. Those are qualities fit for more open leagues, like Italy, Germany, France etc.
2. I am not certain he has high footballing IQ. He certainly has skills, but his vision of the field and decision-making is entirely different matter. Maybe he does, but I have not seen it
3. He has never played in a fast-paced league like EPL, he has never played in high-performing 3-4-4 formation. It's a pretty huge risk to bet on him successfully adapting, considering he is very expensive player and could be huge loss if he fails to adapt. I also have concerns about his consistency - something crucial for us

Some good points. I was comparing him vs Kudus whose numbers are not significantly worse. Latter is also premiership proven and is more versatile and has played as AM before. Maybe lower transfer fee as well (but not certain).
 
I like him as a player, but I think it’s a huge risk that we probably can’t afford to take. It would be way more sensible to spend that money on Mbeumo, a player with more of the physical traits needed in Amorim’s system, who has technical ability and is PL proven. He’s also versatile enough to play in any system under any manager, should we inevitably need to move on from Amorim and be stuck with his style of player, as has happened time and again with this club.
 
I have watched a lot of him and, must admit, do not see some of what you see.

You are 100% highlighting his dribbling and ball-carrying. He is very technical, but

1. Dribblers and technical players have traditionally not necessarily been successful in England. Those are qualities fit for more open leagues, like Italy, Germany, France etc.
2. I am not certain he has high footballing IQ. He certainly has skills, but his vision of the field and decision-making is entirely different matter. Maybe he does, but I have not seen it
3. He has never played in a fast-paced league like EPL, he has never played in high-performing 3-4-4 formation. It's a pretty huge risk to bet on him successfully adapting, considering he is very expensive player and could be huge loss if he fails to adapt. I also have concerns about his consistency - something crucial for us

No wonder its high performing if you can play 12 men. :confused:
 
I have watched a lot of him and, must admit, do not see some of what you see.

You are 100% highlighting his dribbling and ball-carrying. He is very technical, but

1. Dribblers and technical players have traditionally not necessarily been successful in England. Those are qualities fit for more open leagues, like Italy, Germany, France etc.
2. I am not certain he has high footballing IQ. He certainly has skills, but his vision of the field and decision-making is entirely different matter. Maybe he does, but I have not seen it
3. He has never played in a fast-paced league like EPL, he has never played in high-performing 3-4-4 formation. It's a pretty huge risk to bet on him successfully adapting, considering he is very expensive player and could be huge loss if he fails to adapt. I also have concerns about his consistency - something crucial for us
Agree with a lot of this. Anthony was a dribbler in the Dutch league but he can’t deal with the pace of the PL, the defenders are generally quicker and stronger than other leagues in Europe. Kvara is a huge talent and a good deal at the price floating around, but he’s definitely a huge risk, more so than players that have flopped like Sancho and Anthony
 
Agree with a lot of this. Anthony was a dribbler in the Dutch league but he can’t deal with the pace of the PL, the defenders are generally quicker and stronger than other leagues in Europe. Kvara is a huge talent and a good deal at the price floating around, but he’s definitely a huge risk, more so than players that have flopped like Sancho and Anthony
Watch him play in the UCL vs Liverpool on multiple occasions and you'll probably see why a comparison to Antony against PL level opposition is crazy.
 
We have them Scotland’s best player, it’s only fair they give us Georgia’s in return.
 
Got to be done in January has it? Priority is it? Nah didn’t think so. Drop the sarcasm, no need to be a dick.
Nobody said January. We're just objectively not stacked in his position. Is it a priority though? Kind of!

Problem is almost everywhere is a priority.

I don't see it happening, but if this was the one deal we did in Jan, I wouldn't be complaining
 
Watch him play in the UCL Liverpool on multiple occasions and you'll probably see why a comparison to Antony against PL level opposition is crazy.
Oh I’m not saying he isn’t a better player than Anthony, he obviously is. But they have some similar qualities. I’m saying the risk is greater. Ten Hag knew what Anthony was and couldn’t make it work. For me that was less of a risk at the time because he knew the player well.

Kvara is an exceptional winger but it’s a far greater risk signing a player from Italy, as we’re seeing with Zirkzee. On the other hand, players like McTominay and Smalling can go in the other direction and look far better players because of their physical strengths. There are lots of factors in that, but one has to be the pace and intensity of the league.

I’d be chuffed if we could sign him because I think he could be a phenomenal player for us. But the risk involved should be a factor. I’d have more confidence in Mbeumo at this point, is all I’m saying.

With what is happening regarding Rashford and Garnacho, I just want players that want to be here and to work hard for that shirt
 
Oh I’m not saying he isn’t a better player than Anthony, he obviously is. But they have some similar qualities. I’m saying the risk is greater. Ten Hag knew what Anthony was and couldn’t make it work. For me that was less of a risk at the time because he knew the player well.

Kvara is an exceptional winger but it’s a far greater risk signing a player from Italy, as we’re seeing with Zirkzee. On the other hand, players like McTominay and Smalling can go in the other direction and look far better players because of their physical strengths. There are lots of factors in that, but one has to be the pace and intensity of the league.

I’d be chuffed if we could sign him because I think he could be a phenomenal player for us. But the risk involved should be a factor. I’d have more confidence in Mbeumo at this point, is all I’m saying.

With what is happening regarding Rashford and Garnacho, I just want players that want to be here and to work hard for that shirt

Who wasn't great in Italy by the way, he played well for 6 months
 
Psg offer is 45 m euros.
And Napoli lowered the request from 80 to 70 m.

I think 60-65m euros and you can buy Kvara. A bargain.
Please don’t post up such things without linkable proof. Not calling you a liar, but it’s bad for the thread if such things get carried away with nothing backing them.
 
Nobody said January. We're just objectively not stacked in his position. Is it a priority though? Kind of!

Problem is almost everywhere is a priority.

I don't see it happening, but if this was the one deal we did in Jan, I wouldn't be complaining
We have more options to play in Kvicha’s positions than at LWB or ST.

Just because you like the specific player doesn’t make it a priority, and just because all players *could* be improved upon doesn’t make them a priority.

It’s about the collective and having a better balance in the squad.
 
Please don’t post up such things without linkable proof. Not calling you a liar, but it’s bad for the thread if such things get carried away with nothing backing them.

The source is la Repubblica. One of the main Italian newspapers.
 
No doubting the quality is there for him but I just can’t help but think he’s the wrong fit for us right now and not where we need to be spending £50m-£70m.

IMO the profile of player we need to be adding to our first XI has to include pace, power and stamina on top of everything else.

That's a valid argument against signing him. Esp for us. And for anyone in EPL.
 
Oh I’m not saying he isn’t a better player than Anthony, he obviously is. But they have some similar qualities. I’m saying the risk is greater. Ten Hag knew what Anthony was and couldn’t make it work. For me that was less of a risk at the time because he knew the player well.

Kvara is an exceptional winger but it’s a far greater risk signing a player from Italy, as we’re seeing with Zirkzee. On the other hand, players like McTominay and Smalling can go in the other direction and look far better players because of their physical strengths. There are lots of factors in that, but one has to be the pace and intensity of the league.

I’d be chuffed if we could sign him because I think he could be a phenomenal player for us. But the risk involved should be a factor. I’d have more confidence in Mbeumo at this point, is all I’m saying.

With what is happening regarding Rashford and Garnacho, I just want players that want to be here and to work hard for that shirt
One has been earmarked as a potential Ballon D’Or winner and the other is Anthony.

I would be interested in hearing what similarities you believe they have because I never thought I would see a day when they would be likened to one another. Even at Anthony’s very best, it was clear he needed an exceptional flanker to “unlock” him. Kvara’s motivation seems to have slumped at Napoli and he has wanted out tor a while. Do you think maybe that slump is leaving an impression on you?

There’s absolutely no question he’s a risk, but that goes for any signing; I don’t think there are many bet your house on signings in the entirety of football at the moment.
 
No doubting the quality is there for him but I just can’t help but think he’s the wrong fit for us right now and not where we need to be spending £50m-£70m.

IMO the profile of player we need to be adding to our first XI has to include pace, power and stamina on top of everything else.
But we are also desperately in need of ball carriers and those who can play in tight spaces whilst bringing others into play, so the profiles we are in need of are broad and very problematic for us.
 
Only 26.4% dribble completion (lowest in Serie A).

Putting my muppet hat aside we all know deep down we have no chance at this deal and we need to be prioritising a LWB above all else.

I think it’s a decent fee for him that’s being asked (and suspect he’ll end up leaving for around £60m) but we’re not in any position to compete for him.
 
He is the kind of a player who will get the fans out of the seats..... Brilliant player.

He is the kind of a player you have to go for no matter your other priorities as he is too good and not often available at such a price ( even if it's 80m €)
Thats the exact mindset, Manchester United has to steer away from until we are back settled at a good and competitive level. We have limited funds, the notion that there are players out there we should buy, especially such expensive ones, just because the opportunity is there, is crazy. We have to have a plan and we have to be disciplined to execute it. Once we are settled, we can monitor the market for opportunities like that when we have some excess cash lying around. But right now, that would be crazy.
I like him as a player, but I think it’s a huge risk that we probably can’t afford to take. It would be way more sensible to spend that money on Mbeumo, a player with more of the physical traits needed in Amorim’s system, who has technical ability and is PL proven. He’s also versatile enough to play in any system under any manager, should we inevitably need to move on from Amorim and be stuck with his style of player, as has happened time and again with this club.
I agree. This kind of money is something, we shouldn't affort ourselves given that we brought ourselves in the position we are in right now, with half the CBs leaving plus half the midfield and winger and striker options questionable at best.
 
He's a good player, but there is no way we can spend 80m on him. We broke.
 
Then please source that, rather than word of mouth.
I readed the article on the paper edition of Repubblica.
This is the text (in italian):

A far precipitare la situazione di colpo sono stati gli agenti del campione georgiano, che hanno respinto per l’ennesima volta la proposta di rinnovo di Aurelio De Laurentiis (6 milioni netti fino al 2029, comprensivi di bonus) e si sono fatti ambasciatori dell’offerta messa sul tavolo dal Paris Saint Germain per acquistare a titolo definitivo illoro assistito: 45 milioni di euro. A queste condizioni economiche non se ne farà nulla, ovviamente.

And from Gazzetta dello Sport:

Se cessione deve essere, sarà solo per soldi. Diciamo intorno agli 80 milioni (ma anche 75 o 70).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fortitude
I readed the article on the paper edition of Repubblica.
This is the text (in italian):

A far precipitare la situazione di colpo sono stati gli agenti del campione georgiano, che hanno respinto per l’ennesima volta la proposta di rinnovo di Aurelio De Laurentiis (6 milioni netti fino al 2029, comprensivi di bonus) e si sono fatti ambasciatori dell’offerta messa sul tavolo dal Paris Saint Germain per acquistare a titolo definitivo illoro assistito: 45 milioni di euro. A queste condizioni economiche non se ne farà nulla, ovviamente.

And from Gazzetta dello Sport:

Se cessione deve essere, sarà solo per soldi. Diciamo intorno agli 80 milioni (ma anche 75 o 70).
:+1:
Helpful for those who pick you up on what you are saying.
 
We have more options to play in Kvicha’s positions than at LWB or ST.

Just because you like the specific player doesn’t make it a priority, and just because all players *could* be improved upon doesn’t make them a priority.

It’s about the collective and having a better balance in the squad.
Kvicha + Nuno Mendes would be great and pretty much sort that left side out, though PSG might not play ball if we sign Kvicha over them. We cant sort ST in summer.
 
One has been earmarked as a potential Ballon D’Or winner and the other is Anthony.

I would be interested in hearing what similarities you believe they have because I never thought I would see a day when they would be likened to one another. Even at Anthony’s very best, it was clear he needed an exceptional flanker to “unlock” him. Kvara’s motivation seems to have slumped at Napoli and he has wanted out tor a while. Do you think maybe that slump is leaving an impression on you?

There’s absolutely no question he’s a risk, but that goes for any signing; I don’t think there are many bet your house on signings in the entirety of football at the moment.
I’m comparing the transfer in terms of risk, but in terms of the player strengths and styles, whoscored as the first site I went on comparing the two has them both:
- passing
- long shots
- holding onto the ball
- likes to cut inside
- likes to do lay offs

And I’d argue one of Antony’s strengths before we signed him was dribbling. Kvara is stronger at finishing, dribbling and key passes. But like I said, he is a far better player.

In my opinion, the lack of intensity in that league and the number of talented players that have flopped in the PL makes it a more risky transfer than other options available
 
Only 26.4% dribble completion (lowest in Serie A).

Putting my muppet hat aside we all know deep down we have no chance at this deal and we need to be prioritising a LWB above all else.

I think it’s a decent fee for him that’s being asked (and suspect he’ll end up leaving for around £60m) but we’re not in any position to compete for him.
That’s an interesting one. I’m sure he’s the most tracked and multiple marked player in that league (and very probably of any player active), so that stat will have pros for the team that need to be factored in too; stopping him is not a 1-man job, thus spaces are open for others to run into as he does his Pied Piper thing.
 
I’m comparing the transfer in terms of risk, but in terms of the player strengths and styles, whoscored as the first site I went on comparing the two has them both:
- passing
- long shots
- holding onto the ball
- likes to cut inside
- likes to do lay offs

And I’d argue one of Antony’s strengths before we signed him was dribbling. Kvara is stronger at finishing, dribbling and key passes. But like I said, he is a far better player.

In my opinion, the lack of intensity in that league and the number of talented players that have flopped in the PL makes it a more risky transfer than other options available
I don’t know how much of both you have watched at their best, or even worst, but I’d be surprised if your eyes lead you to the same conclusion. If anything, Kvara has Neymaritis in crisis; overplaying and trying to do too much by himself, taking on one (or two) too many when his teams are struggling. Kvara also has no restrictions at all on where he runs because his dribbling is that good. He doesn’t need teammates to play his game or have to wait for any sequential triggers before coming alive. In other words, he is the catalyst that more often sparks things into life and that same set of qualities can lead to cul de saccing or a decision that a lesser player doesn’t have on the table in the first place to mess up. You’d be better off likening elements to the injury free Martial than Anthony, who has always been a system player and a cog who had to wait his turn to be effective. My opinion, of course. Just a very different branch off between the two, from the outset.
 
He's very reliable.

Nah, Bruno is a pretty awful left 10. He can't dribble or play on the half turn.
Disagree with the assessment. How you can have watched the game against Liverpool and come up with the assertion that he's pretty awful at LAM is beyond me.

He indeed can't dribble, but not every AM needs to be a dribbler. He has a good shot on him, especially coming from the left, and he scores plenty when in or around the box. He's also our top assister and chance creator and he's more useful up the pitch than deeper in midfield. If we want a more direct dribbler/runner then there's also Garna. I insist that LAM is the last position that needs strengthening atm, considering Mount is also still around and has looked good whenever he's played.

PS. We still also have Sancho on the books until the end of the season and maybe more if Chelsea implode.
 
I can't express how annoyed I'll be if we spunk 80mil on this guy in a position we're already stacked in, while we're in desperate need to spend that sort of money on a CM and a striker.
“Stacked” in the 10 role in Amorim’s system? Now that’s an interesting take. We need wingbacks, a cm, at least one “10” and a cf tbf.
 
Let's be honest, these are the type of signings we should avoid... Not that I think it's a feasible transfer anyway. We need hungry players with huge workrate and physical attributes. He would command a big fee and subsequently huge wages - which would likely result in an unmotivated high earner within a few months such is the culture at the club.
 
“Stacked” in the 10 role in Amorim’s system? Now that’s an interesting take. We need wingbacks, a cm, at least one “10” and a cf tbf.
There's no 10 role in Amorim's system. There's LAM and RAM. Even if you discount Garna as a LAM (which I don't agree with) there's still Fernandes and Mount. LWB, CM, CF and even GK should be miles ahead as priorities than LAM.
 
There's no 10 role in Amorim's system. There's LAM and RAM. Even if you discount Garna as a LAM (which I don't agree with) there's still Fernandes and Mount. LWB, CM, CF and even GK should be miles ahead as priorities than LAM.
10, AM, LAM, RAM….whatever you wanna call it Mike, that’s what I meant.
 
10, AM, LAM, RAM….whatever you wanna call it Mike, that’s what I meant.
Yeah but they are distinct positions, like LWB and RWB. You don't see Amad on the other side, for example. Kvara would come as a LAM. And specifically for the LAM position, yes we are absolutely stacked atm.

Or at least we have enough quality and depth that other positions need prioritising instead of making another LAM a marquee, expensive signing.