bosskeano
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2020
- Messages
- 6,384
not bad for madrid to potentially pay 120m for a luxury player just based on the guys they already have in midfield
Bit of a pipe dream that.
Are you saying it won’t be United turn on the wheel of the EPL in 5 years time?
Who cares. We need to go after players we can get, and most likely we will try for Enzo againwe're no longer even being touted as a possible suitor for this guy. same for Rice. even the red tops have stopped making up "interested in" and "connected to"
We don't have money mate. Our budget if we get CL spot is probably about 70m-80m with 200k p/w in the summer (without selling) + 600m debt. New owner might need to pay the debt off to increase that budget.we're no longer even being touted as a possible suitor for this guy. same for Rice. even the red tops have stopped making up "interested in" and "connected to"
Plus the Qataris will be bringing a cash injection of 300 million for summer transfers. Let's not forget that.We don't have money mate. Our budget if we get CL spot is probably about 70m-80m with 200k p/w in the summer (without selling) + 600m debt. New owner might need to pay the debt off to increase that budget.
But we'll be sold by the summer according to reports, so we will have money, so what your saying makes no sense.The world and their wife know we have no money, so if we're buying a big name this summer, its a forward, hence why we're not linked anymore
There is no guarantee that new owners would invest more. It's a bit naive to assume that.But we'll be sold by the summer according to reports, so we will have money, so what your saying makes no sense.
Or this is a great tactic to counter the Ed Woodward era of "we have unlimited funds and can buy anyone"The world and their wife know we have no money, so if we're buying a big name this summer, its a forward, hence why we're not linked anymore
Due to new 2022 FFP rules, that 300m cash injection won‘t help. Hence why there was news said we must sell players.Plus the Qataris will be bringing a cash injection of 300 million for summer transfers. Let's not forget that.
All clubs are circumventing FFP. We will too. It takes paperwork that's all. We can sell off land in Antarctica as prime real estate with the right paperwork.Due to new 2022 FFP rules, that 300m cash injection won‘t help. Hence why there was news said we must sell players.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/a-l...cial-fair-play-rules-on-man-utd.474688/page-2
Nah, De Jong is miles better in my opinion. I see Bellingham is a good player but I think he's beyond overrated.Barring a turn around from Liverpool cannot see him going there this summer, if we finish top 3 I still think we will be behind city and real if we are in for him at all, given the finances I do not think ETH would want to blow the majority of his transfer budget on a midfielder, that said straight choice between Bellingham and DeJong is not even close, Bellingham is hands down better would rather waste the DeJong money on Bellingham
Depends what type of player we’re after. They’re both completely different players, I see Bellingham more as a b2b midfielder where as de Jong is like a deep lying playmaker. I think Bellingham is the one we need most as we have Casemiro who drops deep to pick up the ball, won’t work with both him and FDJ playing the same role.Nah, De Jong is miles better in my opinion. I see Bellingham is a good player but I think he's beyond overrated.
I prefer De Jong as he offers something we don't have, ball carrying ability in the midfield.Depends what type of player we’re after. They’re both completely different players, I see Bellingham more as a b2b midfielder where as de Jong is like a deep lying playmaker. I think Bellingham is the one we need most as we have Casemiro who drops deep to pick up the ball, won’t work with both him and FDJ playing the same role.
I would say FdJ could play the Erikson role. Bellingham would obviously replace Fred/McTominay. Rice would also be another consideration.Depends what type of player we’re after. They’re both completely different players, I see Bellingham more as a b2b midfielder where as de Jong is like a deep lying playmaker. I think Bellingham is the one we need most as we have Casemiro who drops deep to pick up the ball, won’t work with both him and FDJ playing the same role.
Ye, both players are top and would bring something I think. I’d be happy with either.I prefer De Jong as he offers something we don't have, ball carrying ability in the midfield.
Not sure about rice. Think that’s a no go since we’ve signed Casemiro. We don’t want to go back to playing 2 DMs. I mean obviously we’ll need to replace Casemiro eventually but I think rice will go to Chelsea. I’d be happy with either FDJ or Bellingham, depends if either of them want to join us though. Bellingham may be tempted by Madrid and FDJ is a lot happier at Barca now and getting more game time.I would say FdJ could play the Erikson role. Bellingham would obviously replace Fred/McTominay. Rice would also be another consideration.
Our midfield options should be Casemiro, De Jong, Bellingham, Eriksen, Iqbal, Fernandes, Caicedo.Nah, De Jong is miles better in my opinion. I see Bellingham is a good player but I think he's beyond overrated.
That's about 250 million worth of midfielders with those 3 additions.Our midfield options should be Casemiro, De Jong, Bellingham, Eriksen, Iqbal, Fernandes, Caicedo.
Do that new rules apply to Chelsea? How have they managed to spend like this?Due to new 2022 FFP rules, that 300m cash injection won‘t help. Hence why there was news said we must sell players.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/a-l...cial-fair-play-rules-on-man-utd.474688/page-2
Because Chelsea sold players with good money. Real Madrid still haven’t fully pay hazard’s transfer fees, the same with Tammy Abraham and etc. and chelsea this season been doing 7 years contract payment when signing new players.Do that new rules apply to Chelsea? How have they managed to spend like this?
Chelsea were given more flexibility with the take over. They've since changed the rules though so future take overs won't get the same benefits.Do that new rules apply to Chelsea? How have they managed to spend like this?
Our midfield options should be Casemiro, De Jong, Bellingham, Eriksen, Iqbal, Fernandes, Caicedo.
FM universeIn which universe?
that sounds extremely convenient.Chelsea were given more flexibility with the take over. They've since changed the rules though so future take overs won't get the same benefits.
The new FFP rule only allows to spend money within a clubs. Unlike other clubs, we have been shit selling players, which financially we will struggle to buy Bellingham.All clubs are circumventing FFP. We will too. It takes paperwork that's all. We can sell off land in Antarctica as prime real estate with the right paperwork.
In Eriksen and Casemiro we have the perfect aged midfield to find and integrate top class young replacements.
For me, the likes of Bellingham and De Jong are too expensive and would demand a starting spot due to the trajectory of their current careers. Casemiro and Eriksen are setting a huge example in that midfield that we don’t want to just walk away from for a shiny new toy.
We should be looking at young top class midfielders that have not hit the heights of Barcelona or World Cups yet who wouldbe enticed at the prospect of learning from Eriksen and Casemiro.
In that bracket I would be attempting to sign premiere proven Caicedo - a CDM replacement if ever there was one. The bring back Mejbri and sell McT. Mejbri is reaching shit or get off the pot time.