Means zilch of you can’t be consistent/consistently committedPogba is a better dribbler, passer, far more creative/skilful, has superior vision and is greater with his left foot than Bellingham too.
Means zilch of you can’t be consistent/consistently committedPogba is a better dribbler, passer, far more creative/skilful, has superior vision and is greater with his left foot than Bellingham too.
Well that is a different argument entirely.Means zilch of you can’t be consistent/consistently committed
Honestly the revisionism about Pogba is sickly.Pogba is a better dribbler, passer, far more creative/skilful, has superior vision and is greater with his left foot than Bellingham too.
I don’t agree except for the passing. Again thats only because Ive watched alot of Bellingham that I have that opinion.Pogba is a better dribbler, passer, far more creative/skilful, has superior vision and is greater with his left foot than Bellingham too.
You can't be a great player without those attributesWell that is a different argument entirely.
Try was maybe.Pogba is a better dribbler, passer, far more creative/skilful, has superior vision and is greater with his left foot than Bellingham too.
He was in his early Juve days? Especially at Jude’s age / stage of career.Means zilch of you can’t be consistent/consistently committed
True, but the argument was purely based on natural talent.You can't be a great player without those attributes
Agreed actually. Pogba's best days are behind him in my opinion.Try was maybe.
The place already stank to be fair. But Pogba wanted a team built around him without having the consistency to deserve it. Bad defensively and bad attitude.Not sure how naturally talented Pogba was or wasn't, one thing is for sure, his attitude stank and he stank up the place.
Those attributes are part of that though. If you don't have it in you to be like that then that's it.True, but the argument was purely based on natural talent.
This shouldn't be a controversial opinion, but the hype train is absurd.Pogba was better in every single footballing way than Bellingham apart from the ability to cover the ground.
When I talk about natural talent, I only really mean in terms of what they can do with a football.Those attributes are part of that though. If you don't have it in you to be like that then that's it.
Surely you have to look at the whole package though. Otherwise you have people thinking a player like Ravel Morrison as being one of the best players of their generation despite barely being good enough to hold a place in a Championship side.When I talk about natural talent, I only really mean in terms of what they can do with a football.
Agree to disagree in that case.I don’t agree except for the passing. Again thats only because Ive watched alot of Bellingham that I have that opinion.
In terms of natural talent though, (or what I perhaps wrongly consider to be natural talent), Ravel Morrison was one of the best players this country has produced in the last 10-15 years.Surely you have to look at the whole package though. Otherwise you have people thinking a player like Ravel Morrison as being one of the best players of their generation despite barely being good enough to hold a place in a Championship side.
I’m calling bullshit, thats called talent against youth playersIn terms of natural talent though, (or what I perhaps wrongly consider to be natural talent), Ravel Morrison was one of the best players this country has produced in the last 10-15 years.
Oh come on that's utter nonsenseIn terms of natural talent though, (or what I perhaps wrongly consider to be natural talent), Ravel Morrison was one of the best players this country has produced in the last 10-15 years.
I suppose sometimes you just know it when you see it. I have no doubt that Ravel Morrison had the natural talent to be a success at United.I’m calling bullshit, thats called talent against youth players
We live in the real world thoughI suppose sometimes you just know it when you see it. I have no doubt that Ravel Morrison had the natural talent to be a success at United.
Best the country has produced in 10-15 years… haI suppose sometimes you just know it when you see it. I have no doubt that Ravel Morrison had the natural talent to be a success at United.
Why is it? Just because he had an underwhelming career relative to expectations, doesn't mean that the talent wasn't there in the first place.Oh come on that's utter nonsense
Um. It does actually. He clearly wasn't good enough.Why is it? Just because he had an underwhelming career relative to expectations, doesn't mean that the talent wasn't their in the first place.
One of the best in terms of natural talent. Certainly.Best the country has produced in 10-15 years… ha
Agreed. Not due to a lack of natural talent though. That only takes you so far of course.Um. It does actually. He clearly wasn't good enough.
No of many players who are brilliant at youth football but go no whereOne of the best in terms of natural talent. Certainly.
Agreed. However, the issue with Morrison was down to off the pitch issues and his mentality. Not a lack of natural talent.No of many players who are brilliant at youth football but go no where
No the issue was hes not good enoughAgreed. However, the issue with Morrison was down to off the pitch issues and his mentality. Not a lack of natural talent.
Ultimately yes, but not for the reason we have been debating. I'd have him in the top 5-10 players in terms of natural talent that this country has produced in the last 10-15 years.No the issue was hes not good enough
That's so bonkers that you believe that. Jake Livermore has had a better career.Ultimately yes, but not for the reason we have been debating. I'd have him in the top 5-10 players in terms of natural talent that this country has produced in the last 10-15 years.
Agreed. Many players have had better careers than Morrison. However, Jake Livermore, like many others, was not more naturally talented than Ravel Morrison. Anyway, I guess we should get this back on topicThat's so bonkers that you believe that. Jake Livermore has had a better career.
Pogba was better in every single footballing way than Bellingham apart from the ability to cover the ground.
They're comparing him to 19 year old Pogba I think. As he did well for Juve and France at the time. Although his world cup performance was a year after his breakout season.Whay are people comparing a 19year old to Pogba? If anything shouldnt we be comparing him to teenagers like Hannibal.
This is a 19year old who has moved from the championship at what was it 17/18 and consitently lit up the Budesliga in MIDFIELD and is lighting up the world cup....that is obsscene regardless of what happens in the next game.
Its so rare to get teenage midfielders breaking through and making an impact at the top level, amazingly we have four with Camavinga, Gavi ad Pedro at the moment.
Whether Bellinghams attributes allow him individually to be a more talented player than Pogba who knows but lets not Pogba is nearing 30 and his club areer performances have been pretty patchy. If we are going to compare defensively Bellingham is far more dynamic trackign runners, positionally aware and intelligent of the shape of the team around him than Pogba has ever been and he is still only 19years old and his decision making is already on a level with Pogbas.....so I find comparing him with Pogba when its unlikely internationally over time England will match France so going on club football with a player who has underwhelmed the vast majority of his club career strange, Bellingham will go on to achieve far more at club level than Pogba I feel
Wilshere was very good midfield maestro teenager19y and already a world class CM? I’m not sure I’ve seen a better player in his position <20y (not wing or pure attacking midtfielder).