- Joined
- Jun 5, 2000
- Messages
- 41,749
Matic is just as slow or not far off. Without the brain
I genuinely hope we keep him for the next season. We have too many players, who are either technically poor or players who are on too high wages to justify being here, to be sold before him
Good 1st half , disappointing 2nd.
He hasn't played for ages but in saying that he still did 100% more than Lingard's done lately.Like the rest of the team to be fair.
For me, the all looked labouring and tired in the second.
He hasn't played for ages but in saying that he still did 100% more than Lingard's done lately.
Find it mental people want him sold. The only player in our team who wouldn’t stick out like a sore thumb in City’s team for being a donkey. He’s the only one who’s up to anything technically. Worth keeping.
Yeah, he's regressed for sure but there are still at least 10 players I'd get rid of before selling Mata.Find it mental people want him sold. The only player in our team who wouldn’t stick out like a sore thumb in City’s team for being a donkey. He’s the only one who’s up to anything technically. Worth keeping.
Score a goal since January, which is three months ago, suddenly he is good enough for Man Utd? So how about two weeks ago vs West Ham, no performance and be substituted by Ole at 55mins, and giving him 0 mins vs Barcelona, Everton and Man City?
So you think Mata was good at previous games? Man Utd played 23 games under Ole, Mata only provided 2 goals and 0 assists (1 vs Reading at January and 1 vs Chelsea yesterday), 10 games even not start for any mins, 8 games for starting line, but 4 games being substituted before 65 mins. The only good games that he played under Ole is vs Reading, vs Fulham, vs West ham penalty if you want to count, and vs Chelsea first half, so basically he had no performance for 19.5 games out of 23. Is it what a good squad player does? If we value a player, we should base on the whole season, not a relatively good game after a few months, and we say he is good enough to the team.You mean 3 games we lost badly?
He won us the penalty against West Ham if you remember correctly... and in the previous game he started before that against Watford he did well in the first half (which is the only part of the game we played well in).
Nah! All we need are 11 fast and strong players. Who gives a feck about technical ability in football!All the criticisms of Mata are about pace and athleticism. Do people not realise that is having forwards with that and nothing more is part of our biggest problem going forward? We’d be a better team with slower players who can keep the ball than with sprinters who can’t.
All the criticisms of Mata are about pace and athleticism. Do people not realise that is having forwards with that and nothing more is part of our biggest problem going forward? We’d be a better team with slower players who can keep the ball than with sprinters who can’t.
We can’t replace a whole squad at once unfortunately. A team that can’t pass the ball shouldn’t really be looking to get rid of one of the few players they have who can pass the ball. If we can replace him with better then great. If we can’t then what’s the point?We need players who have both that is the level that is required now. We can’t keep accepting players because they are better than so and with the ball or they are quick they need to be good enough technically and athletically.
Problem with Mata is he is so slow that it makes his pressing poor as well which would make it tough for him at any top side.
We can’t replace a whole squad at once unfortunately. A team that can’t pass the ball shouldn’t really be looking to get rid of one of the few players they have who can pass the ball. If we can replace him with better then great. If we can’t then what’s the point?
Pressing is not the be all and end all. Keeping the ball will always be more important than how quickly you can win it back.
You already have the point, we can't replace a whole team at once. But how come we get such amounts of deadwoods waiting to clear? It is because we keep rewarding them contracts! (Just count defenders we have already 6 deadwoods - Young, Rojo , Smalling, Jones, Valencia, Darmian, plus Sanchez, Mata, Lukaku not suitable for Man Utd style, and also Matic and Bailly), 2X players for first team, 11 deadwoods, and i already not count Fred, A. Pereira, almost half of the team are useless, and we keep rewarding Young, Smalling, Jones contract, and now Mata, to complete with Man City and Liverpool?We can’t replace a whole squad at once unfortunately. A team that can’t pass the ball shouldn’t really be looking to get rid of one of the few players they have who can pass the ball. If we can replace him with better then great. If we can’t then what’s the point?
Pressing is not the be all and end all. Keeping the ball will always be more important than how quickly you can win it back.
You mean 3 games we lost badly?
He won us the penalty against West Ham if you remember correctly... and in the previous game he started before that against Watford he did well in the first half (which is the only part of the game we played well in).
So you think Mata was good at previous games? Man Utd played 23 games under Ole, Mata only provided 2 goals and 0 assists (1 vs Reading at January and 1 vs Chelsea yesterday), 10 games even not start for any mins, 8 games for starting line, but 4 games being substituted before 65 mins. The only good games that he played under Ole is vs Reading, vs Fulham, vs West ham penalty if you want to count, and vs Chelsea first half, so basically he had no performance for 19.5 games out of 23. Is it what a good squad player does? If we value a player, we should base on the whole season, not a relatively good game after a few months, and we say he is good enough to the team.
Also, I don't think vs Watford is a good game for Mata, he was subtituted at 63mins. And if you remember that penalty vs West ham, a sidepass to Mata, and the oppenent stupid foul, that was oppenent's mistake, not because Mata was in any danger situation. Look at the comments here for the West ham game, did anyone mention that penalty was due to Mata's contribution?
You’re right, keeping the ball is incredibly outdated. There is only one way to play football.That kind of thinking is outdated now winning the ball back as quickly as possible and as high up the pitch as possible is a huge part of the game now. Stopping other teams playing and challenging players on the ball is what the best teams do. Mata isn’t good enough on the ball to paper over his limitations consistently.
We can’t get rid of everyone but someone like Mata whose contract is expiring needs to be signed on reduced terms for one year or moved on. That’s the mindset we need from now on, stop rewarding mediocrity and being scared to let someone go because they do a job every so often.
He was a MoM nominee on MUTV. Since then, he has barely featured and we've been abysmal. Not saying he could have made a huge difference but he might have been a better option than at least one of the players who have been featuring. Ridiculous to keep on about his speed - Matic is also slow, and the quicker players haven't been functioning either. Mata offers creativity that we sadly lack. And he can never be faulted on effort.
As already stated, he was a MoM nominee against Watford. Being subbed doesn't mean he's not having a good game.
He has hardly featured under Ole. Of course, those who have, have done so well recently, haven't they....