Bebestation
Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 11,862
@windco
So you are saying Mourinho had absolutely no interest or influence in - Bailly, Lukaku, Lindelof, Pogba, crying about craving Maguire before the next manager wanted him, wanting perisic & Willian, buying Nemanja Matic as our CDM starter , buying Fred - a player that some are half half about, replacing Rashford and Martial's position directly with Alexis Sanchez instead of playing him at RW and on an absolute crazy contract, effing Lee Grant on contract for absolutely nothing, Mkhitaryan who was a decent player who he exchanged for Sanchez as another LW, using Fellaini as one of his main tactical players.
Like let me guess Jose Mourinho had nothing to do with this and was the guy who really understands Manchester United? I thought our first season with him was much better with winning the Europa league and league cup rather than his second season when he had much more of an imprint at the club - watching Zlatan play with Mkhitaryan, Pogba and a mix of LVG's tenure players he had to utelise like Martial, Blind, Herrera, Rashford was better than watching Lukaku, Matic, Lindelof, Bailly, Faulty Fred, Sanchez all the next season with alot of the previous season players being shunned out or sold.
It's not that success is not important to me but I dont see why with our history we should be the Real Madrid of England more than the Barcelona. Why should we value instant short term success that is quick to die as it was to build, rather than a type of quality based style of football for the youngest of players that we ingrain in our football like a philosophy to make us more successful? That's why people still mention Jose's appointment as a very questionable decision after Van Gaal by Woodward and even the fans who were dribbling out for Jose - both might have been shit or decent to some fans but one was a clear Barcelona type manager and one was Real Madrid's type that we hired one after another.
Then you look at Ole - I'm not the biggest fan of his football but I enjoy it more than Mourinho's simply due to the type of player he uses because he deems it suited to Manchester Uniteds historic style - Bruno, a forward line of 4 strikers for the first time that included Rashford Martial Greenwood & Cavani (rather than sticking to just Lukaku and chucking everyone out just on the sides of the first team), Van de Beek, improving players like Fred, Mctomminay, Shaw and Lindelof compared to his previous manager rather than just chucking them under a bus, going away from the fellaini & Lukaku football, signing players like Telles who are attacking fullbacks whilst we already have defensive fullbacks already in the squad.
Fair enough you think jose would have done better in his third season but he had turned his head directly against United as a club by looking at himself as the different guy and the better guy than the club as a whole - something none of our managers ever did. If you regard that as love for United as you said then so be it.
So you are saying Mourinho had absolutely no interest or influence in - Bailly, Lukaku, Lindelof, Pogba, crying about craving Maguire before the next manager wanted him, wanting perisic & Willian, buying Nemanja Matic as our CDM starter , buying Fred - a player that some are half half about, replacing Rashford and Martial's position directly with Alexis Sanchez instead of playing him at RW and on an absolute crazy contract, effing Lee Grant on contract for absolutely nothing, Mkhitaryan who was a decent player who he exchanged for Sanchez as another LW, using Fellaini as one of his main tactical players.
Like let me guess Jose Mourinho had nothing to do with this and was the guy who really understands Manchester United? I thought our first season with him was much better with winning the Europa league and league cup rather than his second season when he had much more of an imprint at the club - watching Zlatan play with Mkhitaryan, Pogba and a mix of LVG's tenure players he had to utelise like Martial, Blind, Herrera, Rashford was better than watching Lukaku, Matic, Lindelof, Bailly, Faulty Fred, Sanchez all the next season with alot of the previous season players being shunned out or sold.
It's not that success is not important to me but I dont see why with our history we should be the Real Madrid of England more than the Barcelona. Why should we value instant short term success that is quick to die as it was to build, rather than a type of quality based style of football for the youngest of players that we ingrain in our football like a philosophy to make us more successful? That's why people still mention Jose's appointment as a very questionable decision after Van Gaal by Woodward and even the fans who were dribbling out for Jose - both might have been shit or decent to some fans but one was a clear Barcelona type manager and one was Real Madrid's type that we hired one after another.
Then you look at Ole - I'm not the biggest fan of his football but I enjoy it more than Mourinho's simply due to the type of player he uses because he deems it suited to Manchester Uniteds historic style - Bruno, a forward line of 4 strikers for the first time that included Rashford Martial Greenwood & Cavani (rather than sticking to just Lukaku and chucking everyone out just on the sides of the first team), Van de Beek, improving players like Fred, Mctomminay, Shaw and Lindelof compared to his previous manager rather than just chucking them under a bus, going away from the fellaini & Lukaku football, signing players like Telles who are attacking fullbacks whilst we already have defensive fullbacks already in the squad.
Fair enough you think jose would have done better in his third season but he had turned his head directly against United as a club by looking at himself as the different guy and the better guy than the club as a whole - something none of our managers ever did. If you regard that as love for United as you said then so be it.