So against my better judgement, I will respond to the general teeth gnashing and mouth frothing in these posts, by just reiterating the difference between shit and negative. At no point did I say that Moyes or Van Gaal were better managers, had better tenures, were more effective, or played better football. I merely said that of the three - all of whom I find to produce excruciatingly bad football to watch - that Mourinho's tactical style was the most negative. In fact the most negative I have seen in 40 years of watching United. I have never seen a United manager park the bus as often, and for such prolonged period as Mourinho has. He has other qualities as a manager, and I was a strong advocate of his for the job, mainly because I felt his self belief and cult of personality was the only one strong enough not to be cowed by the shadow of Ferguson. But it never really hit home for me, how much "shit on a stick" football we were going to get. For what it is worth, if I had to summarise the three, I would call Moyes inept, Van Gaal overly burden by technical intricacies, and Mourinho negative. I have nothing good to say about the Moyes era, it was fecking bleak. And I have about as many good things to say about the Van Gaal era as I do the Mourinho one. Van Gaal got a 4th and 5th place finish, Mourinho a 6th and 2nd. Mourinho two cups to one. Not much to pick between the two, especially considering Van Gaal's net spend over two seasons was approx 160M and Mourinho's is 302M.
It's all been horribly shit. Mourinho is entering a make or break season. I hope he succeeds.