Irwinwastheking
Gimpier than Alex and Feeky
Yep, Carroll for Liverpool at Newcastle last year was a peno too then, the keeper made a challenge so it must have been.
What are you watching? Evans is moving to his right and then tries to get back to his left at the last second. He's not just "stood on the field of play"
... What are you watching?! Evans sticks out his left leg, that's the only movement he makes... the Braga player makes no contact at all with said leg, he just runs straight into Evans, who was still occupying the space he was in previously.
The Sky pundits in the studio summed it up pretty well I thought.
Any mention of injury? When Rio was warming up commentators said that Evans seemed to be the one because of what looked like a groin issue. I thought Rio was going to come on for Smalling because he had the issue earlier in the game.
Just hope it's not an injury to Evans, he's been very good.
Yeah, he was getting into position to make a challenge... that surely can't be seen as being part of the challenge itself.
The fact is, Evans gets into a position to make a challenge, which he does before making any challenge of any sort. The Braga player knocks the ball and then immediately charges into Evans, who hasn't moved from his base position of which me made the challenge. The Braga player (I should really find out this fella's name!) knocks the ball and then, quite literally, jumps into Evans, who has no chance what-so-ever of getting out of the way....
If that's a penalty, then anytime any player runs into another, it could be deemed as a foul... which would be crazy.
Evans doesn't take him out with his leg, or move his body in any way to attempt to block the attacker. If he stepped off his position and turned into the player to block him then sure it's a pen, but he stood his ground, the player ran into jonny then hit the deck holding his face. The ref was conned all night by braga players holding there faces.
Unfortunately defenders cannot run out of the way with an oncoming player, it's up to the attacker to get round the defender. If he had gone round jonny and then he went into his path then it's understandable, but he really did nothing wrong.
I remember Zhirkov won a penalty against us in the exact same manner when he got blocked off by Smalling. Everyone was saying that it was an undeserved penalty. Speaks a lot about the caf's inconsistency/biaseness.
Not his finest hour, last night. Caught positionally a couple of times. True that he seems more comfortable beside Rio or Vidic than as the senior partner. That's fair enough, I suppose. He'd be a massive loss if he is injured, Smalling or no.
A possible groin strain according to Phelan It's only fair that Evans gets a few months on the sidelines now that Smalling is back isn't it? We've still got Carrick as a back up.So he's injured?
That's great. Looking forward to another injury to either Rio or Smalling now when Jones comes back. Apparently it's impossible for us to have more than 2 center backs fit.
You cant just play the ball to the side and barge right into the body of the defender and expect a penalty. Yes, Evans made a movement that might have impeded the attacker, but that doesnt change the fact that the attacker made no attempt to get around Evans at all. This kind of "clever" play is just the same as leaving a leg trailing behind to get caught. Its cheating. Never a pen.
Obstruction isn't given any more - it's either play on or a direct freekick.Its definately an obstruction imo ('impeding the path of an attacker'), which is an indirect free kick inside the box.
No one in this thread since last night has explained yet how within the laws of the game a penalty is the right decision. He hasn't tackled the player (just an attempt made to play the ball), he hasn't charged into the player, used excessive force, or committed any other of the offences that warrant a penalty, so for those that are so certain its the right decision, please enlighten me.
Obstruction isn't given any more - it's either play on or a direct freekick.
Please tell me at what point Evans stood his ground. Don't you have to be stationary to stand your ground?
So after initially moving right to cover the run how many steps does he take left? Watch his right foot. His position is planted but his weight changes from right to left, that is not enough to suggest he has intentionally deviated his course to block the attacker! He's moved a few inches minimum.
Absolutely nothing he could of done there.
You cant just play the ball to the side and barge right into the body of the defender and expect a penalty. Yes, Evans made a movement that might have impeded the attacker, but that doesnt change the fact that the attacker made no attempt to get around Evans at all. This kind of "clever" play is just the same as leaving a leg trailing behind to get caught. Its cheating. Never a pen.
You're deluding yourself. I have watched his right foot but since he has two feet, I've also watched his left foot. You know, the one that kicks out at the ball, hits the player and gets nowhere near the ball.
The fact that he stops moving to his right, shifts direction to his left (where the ball is) and kicks out his left foot suggests that yes he has intentionally deviated his course to block the attacker. Or if you want to be pedantic, you can see he intentionally deviated his course in an attempt to win the ball but failed and fouled the attacker in the process.
What could he have done? Not change direction at the last second once he was beaten, not attempt to win the ball.
Your the deluded one his foot doesn't even touch him I wonder if you have ever played football before and been in his position? You will realise he had no chance of moving. Perhaps you should watch the review of the goal by Neville Redknapp and Collins, they called it how it was.