Played really well against Chelsea and was arguably our best player in the first half against Wolves... He didn't let them settle at all and his pressing and disruption of their attempt at possession was the key reason we were so dominant in that first half.
But Wolves changed it up, Lingard's pressing became less advantageous to us and he had a poor first 20-mins of the second half, like most of our players did.
It's understandable why fans stick it to Lingard... most of his work is done off the ball and some fans can't, for the life of them, give credit for anything done off the ball. They are only interested in what happens to a player when the ball is at their feet (which is only 2% of any player's performance). Jesse is a disruptor.. a chaser - which is a key attribute required in Ole's gameplan. In fact, Lingard does this better than anyone in our squad. Yet, fans can't see it. Some fans can't see it; I should say. They can't even see that Ferguson played Lingard, LvG played Lingard, Mourinho played Lingard, Ole, Southgate - they all play Lingard because he is vitally important to them. Yet blokes with anonymous usernames on football forums can't see it.
I would suggest that Jesses a measuring stick to see if fans truly understand the game. If you think Jesse is a bad player, you don't get it. If you see the performance in Lingard (like Fergie, LvG, Jose, Ole, Southgate do.. then you understand the nuances of football and don't just judge a player on the 2% of the time they are in possession).