What do we think? If this means he'll get 30+ Premier League games under his belt then I'm all for it.
Only downside is that I don't think Sunderland will be any better this season then they were last....
Unless we add a couple of attackers I don't see the point. We lack players capable of taking defenders and even if we add pedro, it's not enough. I'd rather he stays.
Also, Sunderland?!
EDIT: Shouldn't this be in the transfer forum?
Alright then. I wasn't sure of the convention used here.It's about our player, so I'd say no.
All the other transfer discussions about our players being sold are in the Manchester United forum.
It's about our player, so I'd say no.
All the other transfer discussions about our players being sold are in the Manchester United forum.
Would he actually play consistently for Everton, Swansea or West Ham?Would prefer he went to a better club like Everton or Swansea, or even West Ham. He needs to play attacking football. There'll be less pressure on him playing mid-table football most probably. Sunderland are dreadful. Advocaat will probably steer them clear of relegation by a hair, but it will most likely be pretty ugly and I predict they'll be under the kosh most of the season.
We should keep him, he's a massive talent who is easily good enough to get games here.
Are LvG and Dick good mates?
Pointing out more mistakes wouldn't make yours any less of one. How can a thread solely for the purpose of discussing the potential (temporary) transfer of our player, not be in the transfer forum?
Did they play like a Dutch side last season though? Don't remember them playing decent football?Dutch coach who is going to adopt 433, it actually makes a lot of sense.
the same reason the Di Maria and DDG threads are not in the transfer forum.Pointing out more mistakes wouldn't make yours any less of one. How can a thread solely for the purpose of discussing the potential (temporary) transfer of our player, not be in the transfer forum?
If we get a new Striker to rotate with Rooney and if Pedro is signed too then maybe it makes sense to send him on loan.
Sunderland currently have Adam Johnson and Seb Larsson on the wings and Fletcher/Defoe as forwards. Adnan should hopefully get a lot of games in that team.
We should send him on a short loan till the Jan transfer window and extend it if he gets enough games
Did they play like a Dutch side last season though? Don't remember them playing decent football?
I'd imagine the position they were in, it was more needs must football. He had to keep them up. Maybe that is why they let Wickham go. They have Graham and Fletcher there. Adnan could easily score more goals than them. They might play him as a striker.Did they play like a Dutch side last season though? Don't remember them playing decent football?
Can he play?
The question is would he develop quicker playing/starting games every week. Likely yes, which in the long run will be better for us.
I'm sure he also wants to try and make the team for the EUROS
Well yeah, if you could guarantee me he would start every week then perhaps it would be a good idea. Unfortunately that's not the case with loan deals, some work out well, some fail badly. It seems an unnecessary risk to take with Januzaj's development as I had think he will get plenty of games plus better coaching at United.
Forgot about Defoe. Whoops!I think he'll start. They want to play 433 they got rid of Wickham who was playing in that system but didn't fit as a wide forward. Now they have Graham and Defoe and Adam Johnson. He'll get games for sure IMO