Played 90 mins in a 3-0 win.. any idea how he played?
Played 90 mins in a 3-0 win.. any idea how he played?
Low passing stats for midfielder to be honest.95 minutes played
34 passes attempted
25 passes completed
8 long passes attempted
4 long passes completed
3 tackles won
2 key passes
1 clearance
1 foul won
Low passing stats for midfielder to be honest.
Read those. It sounds like he was deployed as the holding midfielder with another new signing to do a lot of hard/dirty work.
not necessary bad numbers. I didn’t watch the games he played. I am just speculating simply. If he put in many risky passes, the number won’t look good.The game before he completed 26 of 38. Not good numbers. However, they seem very happy with him. Great to see him getting trusted right away and doing well.
Low passing stats for midfielder to be honest.
From the few games he played for Ole, Garner was not able to impose himself in the game especially the position he plays at is a must. Hopefully after this loan he will come back with the confidence to impose himself. I don't think he needs to be physically stronger but a player to know when to step in attack the opposition and when to attempt in intercepting the ball.Seeing as we're not being linked with any DMs it's quite positive to see Garner in his deeper, natural position, always felt one of his strongest skills was his ability to control the tempo of games. From the few games we've seen of him at Forest he looks good on the ball but lacks the physical edge, luckily there's not many better leagues to learn the physical side of the game than the Championship. The Forest manager seems to be actively encouraging him to act as the deep playmaker, he looks to have been given more responsibility at Forest than at Watford.
I find with a lot of young players who struggle to impose themselves it's usually due to confidence because it's obviously a huge step up from dominating the U23 league to playing against men, it can take players a few seasons to find their feet but the talent's always there.From the few games he played for Ole, Garner was not able to impose himself in the game especially the position he plays at is a must. Hopefully after this loan he will come back with the confidence to impose himself. I don't think he needs to be physically stronger but a player to know when to step in attack the opposition and when to attempt in intercepting the ball.
Totally agree, but is Garner trying those killer passes? I don't think he's in the mould of Bruno but more of a box to box or CDM.Passing accuracy means very Little unless you know what kind of passes he makes. Bruno probably has no more than 60-70% accuracy in most games because he tries the killer passes almost every time. He can miss 3 of them and the last leads to a goal or a big chance. Stats look awful but it will win us the game. If Garner constantly tries 40-50 meters passes he will miss quite a few, but he still produces more than if he rolls every pass 5 yards to a teammate and scores 95% in passing accuracy
Totally agree, but is Garner trying those killer passes? I don't think he's in the mould of Bruno but more of a box to box or CDM.
He's playing deeper for Forest than at Watford. A fixed 6 with a 6/8 presser next to him. He needs the busy destroyer alongside.At Watford he didn't - but from what I have seen and read from the first matches for Forest, he has made a lot of long-range passes. Almost a quarterback-style of player
I hope it clicks for him with us as we need a player like him in the squad that can control the tempo of the game.I find with a lot of young players who struggle to impose themselves it's usually due to confidence because it's obviously a huge step up from dominating the U23 league to playing against men, it can take players a few seasons to find their feet but the talent's always there.
I could be completely wrong and I’ve only really watched the occasional highlight video while he’s been on loan, but he just doesn’t come across as very physical. Looks extremely slender /stick like.
How physical is he? He may be stronger than what he looks.
Carrick's always the one mentioned and I think it's the best comparison you could really make in modern football, he'll actually have Carrick at United to mentor him which should be fantastic for his development.It's not really his game, although nowhere near the level yet, I'd compare his physical and defensive side of the game to be moulded much like Carricks game. Closing off space and making interceptions rather than being the strong dominant tackler of midfield.
Carrick's always the one mentioned and I think it's the best comparison you could really make in modern football, he'll actually have Carrick at United to mentor him which should be fantastic for his development.
Matic too now that I think about it, quite the group!Yeah he'll have Carrick and Fletcher to learn off so his defensive side should come on well
Carrick's always the one mentioned and I think it's the best comparison you could really make in modern football, he'll actually have Carrick at United to mentor him which should be fantastic for his development.
Yeah, he had a lot more license to get forward last season in the U23s. It seemed to be helping his end product out a lot, he got 9 last season which is a good return whichever way you slice it.I think couple of years ago or last season he was much more than controlling midfielder. He had such a brilliant shot and scored lot of goals. He can be Carrick type but with goals.
Carrick also had very good shot, shame he barely went for long range goals.
It'll be interesting how things develop with him at Forest but I do like Ethan Galbraith too and he could potentially develop into a better player long-term due to the fact he's more mobile and quicker.
It's very hard to predict player projection and I agree it does seem like the club do rate Garner higher than Galbraith and Levitt. But the reason I like Galbraith is due to him being being very mobile and also being a very good footballer technically to boot.It's interesting to see fans opinions on Garner, Levitt and Galbraith. From my point of view, Garner is the most talented player and has the most chances to make it at United. Levitt and Galbraith are good footballers, but don't have the x-factor or mentality to play in the middle of the park for Manchester United. You also get the feeling that Garner is more highly rated by the coaching staff than the other two.
We'll be interesting to see how he develops at Forest. You can see that his body still needs to grow, but that will come over time and the physical Championship will definitely help his development.
It's very hard to predict player projection and I agree it does seem like the club do rate Garner higher than Galbraith and Levitt. But the reason I like Galbraith is due to him being being very mobile and also being a very good footballer technically to boot.
But it's difficult to say if any will make it at United.
It's interesting to see fans opinions on Garner, Levitt and Galbraith. From my point of view, Garner is the most talented player and has the most chances to make it at United. Levitt and Galbraith are good footballers, but don't have the x-factor or mentality to play in the middle of the park for Manchester United. You also get the feeling that Garner is more highly rated by the coaching staff than the other two.
We'll be interesting to see how he develops at Forest. You can see that his body still needs to grow, but that will come over time and the physical Championship will definitely help his development.
Now that was 45 minutes of my life I will never get back - well slightly less, I started watching after 20 minutes
Certainly does not look out of his depth. It will give him the experience he needs.