Terminator
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,928
Exceptional player. Just had a poor game.
Idiots because they use actual full game evidence (as opposed to favourable YouTube edits) to form an opinion?Exactly the same fecking idiots.
You’ll be the first to remind everybody that it isn’t the players fault for his fee when he plays crap for us?Exceptional player. Just had a poor game.
I did get more information, transfermarkt a German based website owned by Axel Springer..
Look I get it, you are a Leverkusen fan, I don't really need to expand on that.
That's the same meaning mate.
What about this now? " Fee just above 70m + add-ons. "
So you’ve chosen this game as your “full game” evidence to come to the conclusion?Idiots because they use actual full game evidence (as opposed to favourable YouTube edits) to form an opinion?
Given your posts in this thread, it's better you never expand anything at all in the future. That's Brexit levels of delusion.
What the hell are you even on about. You seem a bit of a unstable crybaby
What are you on about?You’ll be the first to remind everybody that it isn’t the players fault for his fee when he plays crap for us?
Mkhitaryan had similar if not better numbers before we bought him.People slating him for having an off game where the entire England team looked well off the pace.
Just look at his numbers instead of trying to form an opinion in one game you’ve watched during the off-season.
I'm just easily annoyed when I encounter people with cognitive dissonances. Grinds my gears, no matter the topic.
Why has there been nothing in the media about city letting this talent go? When it was Pogba we didn't hear the end of it.
Nope. I’m saying he was terrible today for a player supposedly worth £100+m.So you’ve chosen this game as your “full game” evidence to come to the conclusion?
And Mbappe is crap too for his final performance?
Oh come on manMkhitaryan had similar if not better numbers before we bought him.
You're delusional.Nope. I’m saying he was terrible today for a player supposedly worth £100+m.
Such players shouldn’t have this bottom level of performance. Ditto Mbappe.
Rule Brittania. Happy now?You're delusional.
It must be a chore looking into the mirror everyday than
Mkhitaryan had similar if not better numbers before we bought him.
Nope. I’m saying he was terrible today for a player supposedly worth £100+m.
Such players shouldn’t have this bottom level of performance. Ditto Mbappe.
Im saying I’m bored senseless with this transfer saga and we need to keep padding it with useless posts if we are ever to get to 1000 pagesEven Messi and Ronaldo have terrible performances, what are you chatting? How can you ever expect for a player of even the best quality to not have an off game?
How quick-witted. You remind me of my 5 year old niece, only that she has a better understanding of facts and opinions than you do.
Think everyone's a bit fed up of this saga at this point. It'll happen, just dragging.Im saying I’m bored senseless with this transfer saga and we need to keep padding it with useless posts if we are ever to get to 1000 pages
No it's not. It's just saying the fee has addons. 62m plus 8m add-ons is what's is widely being reported
Agreed. I didn’t even think he was that bad. He did a few good things that most other players can’t.It is worth pointing out that this was effectively a pre-season game.
The issue is you are unable to distinguish the difference between opinions and facts, again other ironic thing you bring up...
How is it not?
It's exactly what I told you before. Around 70m pounds (fee just above 70m) was the agreement of the initial fees and there is adds on that lot of journalist don't know what it is (which is why they only mentioned "plus, +, including add-ons"). What we are all know from weeks ago that Bayer wanted 100m euro.
BBC & Ornstein confirmed this.
On the other hand, you provided zero evidence so far for 62m plus 8m add-ons.
Iam sure you are capable of Googling it yourself...
Nope. I’m saying he was terrible today for a player supposedly worth £100+m.
Such players shouldn’t have this bottom level of performance. Ditto Mbappe.
Obviously. You're the one supporting the "majority opinion" despite the fact (yes, fact) that it was proven wrong by the buying club itself and you're telling me I have issues distinguishing facts and opinions?!
Jesus, this is how political debates with Trump have to feel like. Mental.
You've got to say this is quite conclusive @starman. Especially considering he's just quoted your own named source, and he's obviously saying 70M PLUS add-onsHow is it not?
It's exactly what I told you before. Around 70m pounds (fee just above 70m) was the agreement of the initial fees and there is additional adds on which lot of medias don't know what's in the add on (which is why they only mentioned "plus, +, including add-ons"). What we are all know from weeks ago that Bayer wanted 100m euro.
BBC & Ornstein confirmed this.
On the other hand, you provided zero evidence so far for 62m plus 8m add-ons.
But if we are honest, every player was pretty bad today. It’s the typical England disjointed performance.Nope. I’m saying he was terrible today for a player supposedly worth £100+m.
Such players shouldn’t have this bottom level of performance.
Honestly you seem a bit unhinged, this is a fecking transfer thread, yet you have brought up Brexit and now Trump, bloody weirdo