ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,725
Like Donkey Kong.So.. Is this one on?
Like Donkey Kong.So.. Is this one on?
Really? I have no clue since I watched Dortmund maybe twice all season but watching his highlights videos most of the stuff have come from the left and I don’t think I’ve seen him in those videos beat a player while on the right for more than a handful of times. Obviously, you guys having observed him play more can form better opinions.No he played most games on the right.
Who's Pete Tong?Like Donkey Kong.
Only the greatest DJ ever.
Can we not just sign the player who Dortmund would replace him with?
Your opinion is even more mind boggling considering the best defender in the premier league Van Dyk is 29 years old. I suggest you keep posting your opinions and stop stalking other people's opinions. My opinion remains unchanged. I would prefer a central defender to Sacho if the money was limited. I dont see anything outrageous with that statement.
I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
In previous seasons he's played almost always on the right. This season he started on the right, then switched to the left for a while, and then since the lockdown he's played more centrally.Really? I have no clue since I watched Dortmund maybe twice all season but watching his highlights videos most of the stuff have come from the left and I don’t think I’ve seen him in those videos beat a player while on the right for more than a handful of times. Obviously, you guys having observed him play more can form better opinions.
I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
I see. Why did he got moved to the left/central areas? Is there a reason for that? Genuinely curious because it would be totally stupid for us to splash such a amount knowing his best position is not on the right.In previous seasons he's played almost always on the right. This season he started on the right, then switched to the left for a while, and then since the lockdown he's played more centrally.
I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
I keep seeing people mention him being a RW but it does seem he got moved to play on the left instead (presumably more effective there)?And he might take time to shine for us... But he is perfect for the RW spot.
Sancho just makes sense, it also means IMO we don’t need to go looking for a back up striker.
Martial gets injured, Mason can go up front. Rashford gets injured, Sancho to the left Mason on the right. The 4 can rotate between them.
I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
Dortmund need to get a fecking grip and lower their demands. Aren't they aware who we are?
Aubameyang? Gundogan? Hummels?I have my doubts around players from Dortmund they never turnout good away from their system when they leave. Only really Lewandoski transfer have gone down well so far, which concerning imo.
ars old proven in one of the top leagues in the world, has no bedding in time as grew up in england knows the football like the back of his hand and could play for the same club for 10+ years.
That £70 million for VVD was chuckled at, look at it now.
Sometimes we have to commit to the deals, he is just 20 years old with so many years left at top level. We might go with "next season he will be cheaper" but you never know, maybe clubs like Madrid, Barca might be in for him or if one of the Chelsea signings flop big time, they might try their luck with this deal.
When we are in good position, we have to make full use of it. I don't see any priority position than Sancho. We need one DM, I think Sancho deal shouldn't kill that deal.
Fake newsNBC claiming we've offered $115M and want to get this over the line quickly. Can't be true, United don't do their business like that
He's the position that we need most and have needed for years. No natural right sided player in our squad like him, and no depth in the attack. Signing him solves both right away, as Greenwood then becomes the 4th man who rotates for any of the 3, and we use Ighalo and James as the deeper depth players that their level is more appropriate for.
Greenwood has done well, but he's not a natural on the right and is more a scorer than creator, leaving all creativity through the middle with Bruno and Pogba. Sancho just balances it better and solves a whole lot of depth/competition for places issues.
RW is a position that hadn't been addressed since Nani left. We tried with Mkhitaryan, but everyone knows how that ended. I don't think there's another position in the team that is so exposed.
I'd also rather spend a large chunk of the budget on one position if that meant world class player, rather than fill the team with mid level players just to cover everything in one transfer window.
Pricing always determined by demand and supply, both globally (the market) and locally (the specific buyer) so yeah, but we got what we wanted.Time and time again we keep overpaying for players.... We spent 80m on Maguire.... which was an absolute joke. Sancho hasn't won anything to be classified as a 90m player and before you compare VVD (Southampton) to Sancho (Dortmund). Which team has a better chance of winning titles?
Pricing always determined by demand and supply, both globally (the market) and locally (the specific buyer) so yeah, but we got what we wanted.
At that time we did i assume since we shelled out 80m! But yeah, i'm not sure we got what we really wanted as he's been decent but not amazing...Did we really want Maguire? Since the restart, Lindelof has looked like a better player than him and I don't rate Lindelof all that high.
This. I wouldn't be surprised if we haven't even made any sort of contact with Dortmund today.Classic guessing game from the usual clueless suspects.
Have we got to the part where we are in the initial stages of preparing a bid for Sancho? Or am I too early for that?
Sancho is 20 years old, English and in back to back years has had the most assists in Europe, or 2nd to Messi (De Bruyne up there this season). He scored 20 and assisted 20 in all comps, and wasn't far off last season. He's been basically world class already despite his age. Thats why he's worth that money. He's a generational talent, his stats prove it and his underlying stats show it isn't some fluky finishing run either.Time and time again we keep overpaying for players.... We spent 80m on Maguire.... which was an absolute joke. Sancho hasn't won anything to be classified as a 90m player and before you compare VVD (Southampton) to Sancho (Dortmund). Which team has a better chance of winning titles?
Looks like Ed Woodward's cousin.Only the greatest DJ ever.