Yes because a manager like Klopp would have problem making Sancho work in their team..
Wasn't fixed when Coutinho was still here (and the original plan wasn't "sell him to Barcelona") .
There may already be an agreement for one of our front three to leave in the summer, but I don't think it's that outlandish that we'll have a plan for him getting games without having to sell one of the front three.
Wonder if he might also be schooled in midfield if he were to join.
Still think its more likely he doesn't come here than that he joins, mind.
Wasn't fixed when Coutinho was still here (and the original plan wasn't "sell him to Barcelona") .
There may already be an agreement for one of our front three to leave in the summer, but I don't think it's that outlandish that we'll have a plan for him getting games without having to sell one of the front three.
Wonder if he might also be schooled in midfield if he were to join.
Still think its more likely he doesn't come here than that he joins, mind.
He's spent two years longer than he wanted. Pretty sure this is nothing like he envisioned his career would go when he left Juventus.
Midfield has to be our priority but upgrading this in Jan will be pretty much impossible. If we get the opportunity to strengthen an area that we will ultimately need to do so eventually, we should take advantage of that. I'm not just talking about Sancho but even at striker, if the Haaland lad is available in Jan, I say go for it. I've no doubt the club have their big money targets for mid lined up for bids in the summer (i hope). Obviously if a mid target was available in Jan, I'd gladly priortise that over any other position.
Not to mention he's apparently a Chelsea fan.Probably makes the most sense, Willian starting to age, young team with an English manger showing promise and Chelsea will have money to spend.
Not to mention he's apparently a Chelsea fan.
According to Lampard in a matter of days. By midtime this month there should be a decision made.Say its more or less on, when is the decision on their transfer ban?
I've seen that reported too but I don't believe their paying him that much given Dortmunds wage bill.
This is the first time i've ever heard of his attitude being questioned, and it coincides with the rumours that he wants to leave. Perhaps Dortmund are trying to soften the blow of losing one of their best talents, or he's trying to force a move.
Kinsella is the Chelsea correspondent for Goal and is considered a decent source for Chelsea news. Sam Lee was also working for Goal until he made a switch to The Athletic. There's also a Juve correspondent that works for Goal that is very good. And there's afew more that work for the outlet that are considered good Journos.Goal.com
Alot of black/mixed kids started supporting Chelsea when Drogba was there from what I've encountered. It wouldn't surprise me if the same applied to Sancho so I wouldn't look to deep into him supporting Chelsea.Sancho will go to Chelsea, they need a replacement for Pedro/Willian, he's a Chelsea fan, and will fit in with the great young english lads they already have there.
His bad form is being overexagerated I think. He's scored 7 goals (and 7 assists) already this season which is great for a 19 year-old winger, including one away at the Nou Camp.His season is going exactly how I selfishly wanted it to go in the summer, as I thought it would make it easier for us to get him, but we're not doing our bit of being an attractive destination, far from it.
He isnt worth the 250k+ a week he would be looking for.
Reports suggest that he is already on 190k a week.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/49420133
We should pass on him. But no doubt he will end up here as I cant see any other PL paying him what Woodward will offer.
Ugh. Please no. He's just the winger we need but feel we will lose out.I think he's headed for Chelsea. Rumours (on twitter) suggests their ban has been reduced to one window, which they have already served
Hazard all over again.Ugh. Please no. He's just the winger we need but feel we will lose out.
Now with their ban lifted, Chelsea become the front runner to sign Sancho either in Jan or Next Summer.
Who says that?Now with their ban lifted, Chelsea become the front runner to sign Sancho either in Jan or Next Summer.
Still think Chelsea have bigger advantage than us right now: Top 4 (CL football), London, Sancho also a Boyhood Chelsea fan and Close mate with their youth players.On Redcafe, anyone but United is either favourite to win a signature or a game of football to be fair. Thankfully, in the real world it’s very different.
Just my own opinion.Who says that?
Still think Chelsea have bigger advantage than us right now: Top 4 (CL football), London, Boyhood Chelsea fan, and Close mate with their youth players.
United on the other hand are willing to pay €140m to sign him but are hampered by the prospect of not qualifying for the Champions League
We've got more chance of getting Jaden Smith.
Not saying will will sign Sancho, and obviously at some point expenditure has to translate to results and success, however as we made record profits last year at the end of our least successful period since SAF took over I think that there is some leeway, success doesn't have to be immediate as long as the project is looking good and we are still making profits.I've said all season long that Solskjaers longevity at our club depends on short term successes. If anyone thinks we will afford him time with no realistic expectations of top four then we will have scenarios like above where the club can't move forward.
Still think Chelsea have bigger advantage than us right now: Top 4 (CL football), London, Sancho also a Boyhood Chelsea fan and Close mate with their youth players.