Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,987
Not exactly and didn't claim so but I could use a little humor today, sue me smart oneThese two things are exactly the same and I am very smart
Not exactly and didn't claim so but I could use a little humor today, sue me smart oneThese two things are exactly the same and I am very smart
Are you still living in 2019?We clearly can. Is the club going to into administration if we guarantee £108m to Dortmund?
I think not. So like I said, no excuses.
Take a look around. Plenty of other clubs making moves. We just spent a hefty amount on van de Beek. Do you believe the club will go under if we guarantee Dortmund £108m in instalments? With all our sponsorships, TV revenue (even when reduced) and CL money.Are you still living in 2019?
Apparently Dortmund doesnt want installments. And no other club made a transfer that big so far. It's not about going under it's about the predicted loss during the whole next season. You cant just go on like that no excuses and we have money like it's buying fruit and vegetables at the market.Take a look around. Plenty of other clubs making moves. We just spent a hefty amount on van de Beek. Do you believe the club will go under if we guarantee Dortmund £108m in instalments? With all our sponsorships, TV revenue (even when reduced) and CL money.
No. So no excuses.
Apparently Dortmund doesnt want installments. And no other club made a transfer that big so far. It's not about going under it's about the predicted loss during the whole next season. You cant just go on like that no excuses and we have money like it's buying fruit and vegetables at the market.
When did Dortmund get offered realistic installments? Sounds like we haven't offered this as yet.Take a look around. Plenty of other clubs making moves. We just spent a hefty amount on van de Beek. Do you believe the club will go under if we guarantee Dortmund £108m in instalments? With all our sponsorships, TV revenue (even when reduced) and CL money.
No. So no excuses.
Apparently Dortmund doesnt want installments. And no other club made a transfer that big so far. It's not about going under it's about the predicted loss during the whole next season. You cant just go on like that no excuses and we have money like it's buying fruit and vegetables at the market.
For THIS long? I know it's a lot of money but christ on a bikeMost likely the structure of the payments or how the price of 120 million Euros is met.
Apparently Dortmund doesnt want installments. And no other club made a transfer that big so far. It's not about going under it's about the predicted loss during the whole next season. You cant just go on like that no excuses and we have money like it's buying fruit and vegetables at the market.
You're an expert on United finances to know that?No they just want that money guaranteed not in add ons like we were proposing. We can absorb the losses and it’s certainly not a deal that will cause us any trouble long term.
Then prepare to be absolutely amazed.Even if we sign Sancho this year then don't do anything in January or next summer i'd be happy with that.
It's more important to get the talent in the door and then worry about it later - worst case scenario we can sell a few players to cover that anyway.
I'd be absolutely amazed if the club don't complete this.
You say that now.Even if we sign Sancho this year then don't do anything in January or next summer i'd be happy with that.
It's more important to get the talent in the door and then worry about it later - worst case scenario we can sell a few players to cover that anyway.
I'd be absolutely amazed if the club don't complete this.
Take a look around. Plenty of other clubs making moves. We just spent a hefty amount on van de Beek. Do you believe the club will go under if we guarantee Dortmund £108m in instalments? With all our sponsorships, TV revenue (even when reduced) and CL money.
No. So no excuses.
Even if we sign Sancho this year then don't do anything in January or next summer i'd be happy with that.
It's more important to get the talent in the door and then worry about it later - worst case scenario we can sell a few players to cover that anyway.
I'd be absolutely amazed if the club don't complete this.
They don't have to be realistic. If someone comes up to you to buy your one of a kind car that you don't want to sell, why would you be realistic or nice over the price? If Dortmund don't really need to sell then it's up to United to do the work to make them tempted, and they clearly haven't done that yet.It’s fair enough to ask for 120M euros guaranteed and no adds ons but it's entirely bonkers from BVB to expect it to not come in instalments in this current climate. That is just not realistic at all
I don’t need to be an expert to know that we can easily afford to do it. Anything that says otherwise is a lie.You're an expert on United finances to know that?
Whatever mate.I don’t need to be an expert to know that we can easily afford to do it. Anything that says otherwise is a lie.
Carry on being a Glazer sap.Whatever mate.
AlwaysNo news is good news, right? right?
Yeah the corona virus is all a lie. We haven't lost a penny since no fans were allowed into Old Trafford.QUOTE="BluesJr, post: 26054899, member: 77417"]
I don’t need to be an expert to know that we can easily afford to do it. Anything that says otherwise is a lie.
To me this has the hallmarks of Utd continuously briefing how they`re still trying hard to sign Sancho only to panic buy someone like Perisic in the last week of the window and release a massive expose article of how they heroically tried but failed to sign Sancho due to the pandemic. I don`t think they have the money for this dealI would be more concerned about losing out on Sancho if we had just signed a couple of 20-30m players in the last week. That would have buried the Sancho deal completely.
The fact we aren’t signing anyone suggests to me all the eggs are being put in the Sancho basket. You may or may not like that approach but that’s what it looks like Utd will end up doing. Every dollar is going to towards Sancho.
I am still cautiously optimistic on this and I believe we're leaving it to the very end to try and get a discount. However things can degenerate quickly. It only takes 1 other club to want him or for Dortmund to lose out on his replacement.
Honestly I can't understand this board. Sure 100m+ is big money even in normal circumstances let alone during covid. However we knew about covid for quite a while. Surely we could switch targets and go for a humbler transfer strategy if we wanted. If we got Gabriel, Telles, VDB, and Cengiz Under wrapped up then few would be complaining about us not getting Sancho. It's not perfect but we would have improved the squad which is a step to the right direction. Instead we went big only to refuse to meet the price Dortmund were always going to ask for Sancho. That's ridiculous. We're setting Ole to fail.
To be fair, anyone who pays asking price for a car is a sucker.These two things are exactly the same and I am very smart
When did we last do that though?To me this has the hallmarks of Utd continuously briefing how they`re still trying hard to sign Sancho only to panic buy someone like Perisic in the last week of the window and release a massive expose article of how they heroically tried but failed to sign Sancho due to the pandemic. I don`t think they have the money for this deal
Whatever that means it's daft and childish. And I'm by no means Glazer sap or whatever you mean. You carry on with your childish and simple posts. I try to end our little conversation and you got all personal without any need to act like that. Cheers.Carry on being a Glazer sap.
maybe this is exactly what ole wants and he personally vetos all other options?
They don't have to be realistic. If someone comes up to you to buy your one of a kind car that you don't want to sell, why would you be realistic or nice over the price? If Dortmund don't really need to sell then it's up to United to do the work to make them tempted, and they clearly haven't done that yet.
True about that last point but there was no global pandemic during the previous times that cost us lots of money. I do hope I`m wrong and it still happens but I feel Utd are hiding the truth from everyone that we just don`t have the moneyWhen did we last do that though?
Usually we have a primary target and get our man, regardless of what many say here we don’t often buy a cheap alternative.
True about that last point but there was no global pandemic during the previous times that cost us lots of money. I do hope I`m wrong and it still happens but I feel Utd are hiding the truth from everyone that we just don`t have the money
Carry on being a Glazer sap.
Sure, mate, sure.This sounds like a conversation with a flat earther. Just replace "Glazer sap" with "NASA shill".
Obviously - but if it was a case of no Sancho now and then having to buy somebody else next summer instead - i'd rather take the hit now.You say that now.
I hope we get him, and go on to get more over the next 2 windows.