- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 19,141
- Supports
- ️
So he’d be a squad/bench option which I agree with.He can just have a year bedding in to be honest. He doesn’t have to play immediately.
So he’d be a squad/bench option which I agree with.He can just have a year bedding in to be honest. He doesn’t have to play immediately.
Well it isn't. You've never seen somebody with cramp in their calves and end up pulling their socks down to relieve the pressure?That’s absolute nonsense btw. It’s a style choice that he passes off as superstition. He fancies himself a bit and is quite clearly a bit of a prick.
If he goes a whole career without a snapped shin, and wins some stuff it doesn’t really matter though.
Couldn’t care less what he wears or how he looks.I agree. Plenty of players past and present with big calf muscles play with normal socks. I am sure there are ways to reduce the tightness or get some individual stuff made for you.
As you said, it has more to do with style and how it looks. Grealish is obviously fixed on that, looking at his sleek hair as well. Nothing wrong with it, but let's not pretend he isn't vain. Also his tight shorts. I am sure they have larger numbers than that. He has some thick legs and muscles, but he is also doing everything he can to show them as much as possible.
Ive pulled socks down before for the same reason only ever when deep into a game but it does relieve pressure and helped me feel less likely to cramp up.Well it isn't. You've never seen somebody with cramp in their calves and end up pulling their socks down to relieve the pressure?
Yes he might like it stylistically also but there is a genuine reason for it.
Lingard, Pereria or Grealish? Who are you bringing off the bench if we need a goal?Cant get keen for this one, don't think he's a player for a top team unless he's mostly a rotational player.
Well it isn't. You've never seen somebody with cramp in their calves and end up pulling their socks down to relieve the pressure?
Yes he might like it stylistically also but there is a genuine reason for it.
Obviously he is better than Lingard and Peirera but I'd rather we prioritise improving the first 11 than improving the bench. Dont think we need this profile of midfielder, we have many of them whereas we only have Matic who is competent as a holder.Lingard, Pereria or Grealish? Who are you bringing off the bench if we need a goal?
I noticed that a lot yesterday, seemed to constantly be in his own box just casually dribbling away from a couple of players.Come on, Ole. He'd be brilliant here. His composure when he gets the ball in his teams own box with a player on him is amazing. Arthur-esque.
I'm talking from real world experience that it definitely helps so think what you like I've had calf cramp and pulled my socks down and loosened my shinpad and it feels a lot better.People literally wear compression socks to stop cramp.
They pull down the sock to better massage the muscle and alleviate.
Irrespective of that; he’s never stated that as the reason so you’re wrong twice over.
I wonder what you think of the below then in terms of our current full squad (with an assumed addition of Sancho)?O
Obviously he is better than Lingard and Peirera but I'd rather we prioritise improving the first 11 than improving the bench. Dont think we need this profile of midfielder, we have many of them whereas we only have Matic who is competent as a holder.
If the price is really cheap and he's happy with being a back up after years of being the main man at Villa then sure but otherwise I dont think Grealish is an urgent need.
So for me assuming no changes (listed by best position currently) but with Sancho:
Red:
GK: De Gea, Romero, Grant/Periera
RB: AWB, Dalot, Fosu Mensah
CB: Maguire, Lindelof, Bailly, Smalling, Tuanzebe, Jones, Rojo
LB: Shaw, Williams
CDM: Matic, Garner
CM: Pogba, McTominay*, Fred, Pereira
CAM: Fernandes, Gomes, Lingard
RW: Sancho, Greenwood
LW: Rashford, James, Chong, Sanchez
ST: Martial, Ighalo
Blue - Excellent
Green - Good
Yellow - Ok
Orange - Saveable but sellable
Red - Surplus to requirements
Colour Mixes - Inbetween/on the way to
So in my opinion the weakest depth area is in order:
So depth wise I think CAM is the priority Grealish hasn’t for me shown he’s an excellent CAM. LW in a free role yes.
- CAM - Gomes and Lingard aren’t good enough yet/at all
- CDM* Unless McTominay is moved there Matic is ageing and Garner needs time/a loan
- LW James is getting to be good enough but I’d like a creative option too.
A video showcasing his performances in a midfield role.
There's no such thing as a first 11 these days, it's a squad gameO
Obviously he is better than Lingard and Peirera but I'd rather we prioritise improving the first 11 than improving the bench. Dont think we need this profile of midfielder, we have many of them whereas we only have Matic who is competent as a holder.
If the price is really cheap and he's happy with being a back up after years of being the main man at Villa then sure but otherwise I dont think Grealish is an urgent need.
A video showcasing his performances in a midfield role.
This is much better evidence if the manager and the player feel he is capable. But do we not think it telling that Grealish’s best role in the side is LW?There's also this interview
Asked after the game as to his best position, Grealish, with a smile, replied: “I don’t think the manager will like me saying this, but I prefer playing as a number eight, but I’ll play wherever the manager wants.”
It is that attitude that so impresses Smith, who said: “He can play a number of positions.
“He can play as part of a two in midfield, play as a 10, play as an eight when we play a one and two (an attacking midfielder behind two strikers), he can play left, he can play right"
“I just feel at the moment, for the balance of the team, it (left wing) is a really good position for him. That’s the thing a mature Jack knows now, that he is doing a job for the team by being there"
Yes it’s a squad game but there absolutely is such thing as a first XI...There's no such thing as a first 11 these days, it's a squad game
Yes it’s a squad game but there absolutely is such thing as a first XI...
Just look at Liverpool and tell me you can’t pick out their best XI that also happens to have played almost week in week out in a potentially record breaking season?
There's also this interview
Asked after the game as to his best position, Grealish, with a smile, replied: “I don’t think the manager will like me saying this, but I prefer playing as a number eight, but I’ll play wherever the manager wants.”
It is that attitude that so impresses Smith, who said: “He can play a number of positions.
“He can play as part of a two in midfield, play as a 10, play as an eight when we play a one and two (an attacking midfielder behind two strikers), he can play left, he can play right"
“I just feel at the moment, for the balance of the team, it (left wing) is a really good position for him. That’s the thing a mature Jack knows now, that he is doing a job for the team by being there"
There's also this interview :This is much better evidence if the manager and the player feel he is capable. But do we not think it telling that Grealish’s best role in the side is LW?
We've also been very unlucky with injuriesYes, a first 11 is good but how often have we have our "first XI" fit for more than 4 games in a row?
Liverpool have been extremely lucky not to have injuries to their key players for a considerable amount of time.
We've also been very unlucky with injuries
I'm not opposed to getting Grealish at all. It's just saying teams don't have a starting 11 is a wrong statement. Of course rotation and injuries would happen but there is always a standard starting 11. As the saying goes if its not broken don't fix itYes, so having another quality player who is versatile does solve more problems than it raises.
Let me give you a couple scenarious.
If we have Bruno / Grealish this season - We could have afforded for Pogba to take extra 2 weeks in October by playing a relatively good replacement - he may not have missed majority of the season
If we had Grealish - Rashford could have been rested for a couple games in jan so his back isn't aggravated.
We had that with Maguire where there was fears that he was injured and he was left out of one game and he was back.
I don’t really agree with this. Sir Alex for example would regularly change his side to match his approach depending on the opponent. Plenty of managers operate that way.I'm not opposed to getting Grealish at all. It's just saying teams don't have a starting 11 is a wrong statement. Of course rotation and injuries would happen but there is always a standard starting 11. As the saying goes if its not broken don't fix it
It’s well reported that our issues with injuries are to do with adjusting to the new demands of our playing style. Next season we will have less.Yes, a first 11 is good but how often have we have our "first XI" fit for more than 4 games in a row?
Liverpool have been extremely lucky not to have injuries to their key players for a considerable amount of time.
This is what I want to see. Someone backing up their views so thank you.There's also this interview :
“Some people say I should be a left winger. No thanks. I hate that position! I’m a No 8. I’ll play No 10 if asked, but I haven’t played there for three years".
https://theathletic.co.uk/1202147/2...ack-grealish-video-analysis-of-jack-grealish/
I think Grealish was moved to LW(in the Coutinho role) because he would be closer to goal, and since he is Villa's best player they just want him in around the goal. I think his attributes are more suited to a midfield role. Its a risk for sure, considering he hasnt played there in the top division, but I see all the qualities of a very complete midfielder when I see him.
AgreedWe've also been very unlucky with injuries
It solves them if he’s ready and prepared to be that bit part player without the starting role. I think he likes being the main player and when he’s not playing he does stupid things. This has happened consistently throughout his career only a lot of these things don’t get reported on.Yes, so having another quality player who is versatile does solve more problems than it raises.
Let me give you a couple scenarious.
If we have Bruno / Grealish this season - We could have afforded for Pogba to take extra 2 weeks in October by playing a relatively good replacement - he may not have missed majority of the season
If we had Grealish - Rashford could have been rested for a couple games in jan so his back isn't aggravated.
We had that with Maguire where there was fears that he was injured and he was left out of one game and he was back.
Of course rotation and injuries would happen but there is always a standard starting 11
Their luck is due to the conditioning done early on in Klopps regime. It’s similar (ish) to what Solskjaer has had to do. Bear in mind we’ve gone from Mourinho low intensity to Ole.
It solves them if he’s ready and prepared to be that bit part player without the starting role. I think he likes being the main player and when he’s not playing he does stupid things. This has happened consistently throughout his career only a lot of these things don’t get reported on.
Agreed. It's more like 'this is my starting 11 but no position is safe"Ofcourse, not doubting that. There will be a scenario where you know your best 11. However, this could change in a season. Who thought Matic would be in our first 11 at the start, whereas now you might put him in.
Even if a team has a standard 11, there are positions where you could be unsure of. e.g. For Liverpool, if Keita hits form he could be in, or just before lockdown Ox was there as part of their strongest 11.
As long as you know 9/10 of your strongest team, I think it could work.
Well how long does it take to condition players? How many injuries have Mane, Salah, Firminho, VVD, Henderson, Trent, Robertson got? Don't they have to be conditioned signing from another club too?
Well, no top team will guarantee him a starting role. So either he needs to accept it, or go to a Everton or another club.
Exactly. And Grealish wouldn’t be in the starting XI but would be able to step in with a slight drop in quality.Agreed. It's more like 'this is my starting 11 but no position is safe"
I think Grealish’s problem is the positions we know we have strength are ones he’d be looking at.Ofcourse, not doubting that. There will be a scenario where you know your best 11. However, this could change in a season. Who thought Matic would be in our first 11 at the start, whereas now you might put him in.
Even if a team has a standard 11, there are positions where you could be unsure of. e.g. For Liverpool, if Keita hits form he could be in, or just before lockdown Ox was there as part of their strongest 11.
As long as you know 9/10 of your strongest team, I think it could work.
Well how long does it take to condition players? How many injuries have Mane, Salah, Firminho, VVD, Henderson, Trent, Robertson got? Don't they have to be conditioned signing from another club too?
Well, no top team will guarantee him a starting role. So either he needs to accept it, or go to a Everton or another club.
IMO there is still a lack of quality in some positions, a new right wing and holding midfielder are the most urgent needs to be filled in the squad and before long we should be looking for a new striker, left back, and probably another CB to partner Maguire. Not convinced that the guys we have in these spots now are good enough.I wonder what you think of the below then in terms of our current full squad (with an assumed addition of Sancho)?
Exactly. And Grealish wouldn’t be in the starting XI but would be able to step in with a slight drop in quality.
I think Grealish’s problem is the positions we know we have strength are ones he’d be looking at.
Bruno, Pogba and Rashford are better than Grealish. I’m certain of that. But he’s quality and would be talent wise very good as a rotation option.
Usually to get a team playing how you want you need first the conditioning and also the players. Notice how Solskjaer is freshening up the side with young high stamina players AWB and Dan James for example.
Solskjaer recognises the physical load on our players has increased. If you look at our running metrics for previous seasons compared to Ole it’s a significant change and part of that is accepting injuries as the bodies adapt.
There is a big difference between asking players from bought for the purpose of different systems (Moyes, LVG and Mourinho) to adapt to this new higher intensity. Liverpool under Klopp have had a very slow but deliberate signing process where players are suited to the role and direction the club wants to continue under. Even then some needed time to adapt.
I believe with a full season of Ole ball and increased depth we will see that vast improvement on the injury front the body just needs time but what is encouraging is the cherry picked signings James, AWB and Maguire have had very few problems. We want young fit players
If no top team would guarantee him that time it shows you the level of player he is. Very good but not the best.
I never claimed that was the EXACT reason for it, just a possibility so get off your high horse.
I don’t like the socks attitude...Heated rows about socks are why I come to the caf
Right wing is definitely the weakest. As for the second I'm not sure yet. I think we should at least judge through these remaining 9 games to see if we actually need a holding midfielder. In theory, we do since an ageing Matic is our only DM but let's see whether Fred or Mctominay paired with Pogba in a pivot is good enough.IMO there is still a lack of quality in some positions, a new right wing and holding midfielder are the most urgent needs to be filled in the squad and before long we should be looking for a new striker, left back, and probably another CB to partner Maguire. Not convinced that the guys we have in these spots now are good enough.
IMO there is still a lack of quality in some positions, a new right wing and holding midfielder are the most urgent needs to be filled in the squad and before long we should be looking for a new striker, left back, and probably another CB to partner Maguire. Not convinced that the guys we have in these spots now are good enough.
Grealish hasn’t yet shown the ability to play CAM at a top level in the PL consistently as he’s been a LW with a free role so I’m less convinced at his impact there (he doesn’t like to play with his back to goal) but I do think he’d be better than Lingard and Pereira who I think have had more than enough time.
Agreed. I feel like I agree with you a lot and vice versaRight wing is definitely the weakest. As for the second I'm not sure yet. I think we should at least judge through these remaining 9 games to see if we actually need a holding midfielder. In theory, we do since an ageing Matic is our only DM but let's see whether Fred or Mctominay paired with Pogba in a pivot is good enough.
I'd say the next priority in fixing the starting 11 should be replacing Lindelof and finding a solid partner for Maguire but which defender is available right now that's actually a significant upgrade on Lindelof?
Shaw i think is okay. To put it this way, Barcelona, Bayern, Liverpool etc would still win the league with Shaw as their left back. Martial has potential to be worldclass so he's good for now . On the bench however I'd say the priority should be replaci Lingard/Pereira.
So in order of priority we should get an RW CB and backup AM. DM would come second if Fred/Mctominay with Pogba in a pivot flops
Rolling down your socks IS a legitimate reason to help stop cramp - but fair enough in his situation it may just be a "style issue"Dude, you said, verbatim “It's actually because his calf muscles are too big and normal socks restrict them and give him cramps”
All I did was tell you that you were wrong, and give you the real reason.
Don’t be princessy about people correcting you. It’s how people learn. If it doesn’t happen to me at least once a day it’s probably because I haven’t spoke to anyone.
I watched the game and I saw what I’ve seen regularly from him this season. A LW with license to roam and float because he is unquestionably the main man.He has played there a fair bit for villa though in the championship and has openly said it's his preferred position over LW.
Did you watch last game vs Sheffield United? Grealish played all over the pitch. He was receiving the ball off the keeper and defenders deep in his own half. He was pinging balls into wide areas and was confident enough in his own ability to dribble round their attackers and midfielders still inside his own half! And almost every attack Villa had he was either in a great position to receive the ball or was the creator himself. He can absolutely play midfield. It's a great thing to have a player who plays many positions.
If it's a matter of you or anyone else on here that just dont rate him enough then we will just have to disagree. I think he is top quality and is made for a top club. Some think he is Everton level! Ridiculous!