Samid
He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Guy's a red. Sign him up already.
On a serious note if he's watched that today why would he not want to be a part of this rebuild next season?
Guy's a red. Sign him up already.
I disagree, I think we can fit them all in, and play a high pressing system.We arent dropping Fred and we need a DM alongside him.
Buying Grealish is the bad old days of buy now and fit in later
How? Rashford and Martial start, hopefully Sancho too so its 3 out of Bruno, Jack, Fred, Scott, Matic and hopefully Pogba.I disagree, I think we can fit them all in, and play a high pressing system.
He’s class, and another leader, if we can get him for around 50 mil then do it.
Grealish is a pogba replacement.How? Rashford and Martial start, hopefully Sancho too so its 3 out of Bruno, Jack, Fred, Scott, Matic and hopefully Pogba.
We arent dropping a DM hence Matic contract so where does he actually fit?
We're better off using the money on a partner for Harry and keep our balance.
It would be rare that we would start all of them at once, but they would all start the majority of games each as it allows us to rotate without a massive drop in quality.How? Rashford and Martial start, hopefully Sancho too so its 3 out of Bruno, Jack, Fred, Scott, Matic and hopefully Pogba.
We arent dropping a DM hence Matic contract so where does he actually fit?
We're better off using the money on a partner for Harry and keep our balance.
Grealish makes alot of sense for Liverpool IMO.
The people who claim that Grealish and Bruno cannot play together need to understand the type of players both are. They both run up and down the field. They will track back when defending is required. So it's not that we require someone whose a proper DM to sit back to have Bruno and Grealish play in the same team.
Grealish makes alot of sense for Liverpool IMO.
Ole is looking to build a side who are innately Man Utd characters. If you take a look at the players we've bought (Maguire, James, Wan Bassaka, Bruno and even Ighalo) have that United gene in them. Grealish is cut from that same cloth and if we plan on losing Pogba, we've got more reason to acquire Grealish. Pogba is our best player no doubt but when things aren't going his way, he starts sulking and this has repercussions on the rest of the squad. Pogba also fails to inspire those around him. Yes, he's assisted a lot of folks and plays all these crazy passes. Since Bruno's acquisition, we've started playing as a team and everyone seems to have raised their game. Bruno even called out his teammates when most of them were satisfied with the 1-1 draw at Everton. Pogba hasn't done that. Anyway, didn't want to make it a Pogba Vs. Bruno thing. But the point I'm trying to make is that players like Bruno make us better as a team and in that same way, Grealish does the same. His hard work and leadership instincts makes him one of those characters to get us to performing at the elite level. Grealish would be a starter in a United side. At Liverpool, I'm not sure if he starts ahead of the likes of Henderson, Wijnaldum, Oxlade, Keita and he cannot be played in attack with Mane occupying the left flank.
Ole is looking to build a side who are innately Man Utd characters. If you take a look at the players we've bought (Maguire, James, Wan Bassaka, Bruno and even Ighalo) have that United gene in them. Grealish is cut from that same cloth and if we plan on losing Pogba, we've got more reason to acquire Grealish. Pogba is our best player no doubt but when things aren't going his way, he starts sulking and this has repercussions on the rest of the squad. Pogba also fails to inspire those around him. Yes, he's assisted a lot of folks and plays all these crazy passes. Since Bruno's acquisition, we've started playing as a team and everyone seems to have raised their game. Bruno even called out his teammates when most of them were satisfied with the 1-1 draw at Everton. Pogba hasn't done that. Anyway, didn't want to make it a Pogba Vs. Bruno thing. But the point I'm trying to make is that players like Bruno make us better as a team and in that same way, Grealish does the same. His hard work and leadership instincts makes him one of those characters to get us to performing at the elite level. Grealish would be a starter in a United side. At Liverpool, I'm not sure if he starts ahead of the likes of Henderson, Wijnaldum, Oxlade, Keita and he cannot be played in attack with Mane occupying the left flank.
Where does he play? Can't see it.
He would surely play for Liverpool - he is quite perfect for them as they are just now, would slot into the left centre midfield role and provide the imagination and quality missing from that area of the park.
I hope they are not in for him, but surely a creative attacking midfielder is a priority for Liverpool at this point?
Seriously?
Grealish can play as the AM for Liverpool and makes alot of sense for them. Bruno Fernandes also made alot of sense for them.Ole is looking to build a side who are innately Man Utd characters. If you take a look at the players we've bought (Maguire, James, Wan Bassaka, Bruno and even Ighalo) have that United gene in them. Grealish is cut from that same cloth and if we plan on losing Pogba, we've got more reason to acquire Grealish. Pogba is our best player no doubt but when things aren't going his way, he starts sulking and this has repercussions on the rest of the squad. Pogba also fails to inspire those around him. Yes, he's assisted a lot of folks and plays all these crazy passes. Since Bruno's acquisition, we've started playing as a team and everyone seems to have raised their game. Bruno even called out his teammates when most of them were satisfied with the 1-1 draw at Everton. Pogba hasn't done that. Anyway, didn't want to make it a Pogba Vs. Bruno thing. But the point I'm trying to make is that players like Bruno make us better as a team and in that same way, Grealish does the same. His hard work and leadership instincts makes him one of those characters to get us to performing at the elite level. Grealish would be a starter in a United side. At Liverpool, I'm not sure if he starts ahead of the likes of Henderson, Wijnaldum, Oxlade, Keita and he cannot be played in attack with Mane occupying the left flank.
According to Villa fans, he's best as a inverted forward or at AM/#10. He would fit like a glove behind the front 3.Where does he play? Can't see it.
According to Villa fans, he's best as a inverted forward or at AM/#10. He would fit like a glove behind the front 3.
So where does he play? Keita, Henderson, Wijnaldum
In midfield with Henderson and Fabinho. To the left. The most advanced.
Keita has been a dissapointment thus far and they'll likely try and move him on.So who doesn't play then? Keita cost £60m.
Keita has been a dissapointment thus far and they'll likely try and move him on.
Keita from what I've seen of Liverpool has been a huge flop. And I've watched Liverpool quite often this season. Grealish would be a huge upgrade on Keita and would be a starter.The Liverpool fans seem to rate him. They argue he's been class bar injuries. Fabinho and Henderson are undroppable. There's one spot left and don't see Grealish being a priority for them or being interested in rotation.
Keita from what I've seen of Liverpool has been a huge flop. And I've watched Liverpool quite often this season. Grealish would be a huge upgrade on Keita and would be a starter.
Nah. So no Wijnaldum or £60m Keita.
The Scouse keep saying how good Keita looks when he plays and Wijnaldum is a favourite.
No space for him unless someone leaves.
Yeah. Fabinho and Henderson are first choice and they don’t have a an attacking midfielder. They almost bought Fekir at the same time as Keita (I think it was). The scouse keep bemoaning the lack of creativity in that area, not singing the praises of players who are below the level of the rest of the team. At this point it is a bit of a gaping hole in their side and should be a priority position in the transfer market.
They'd have to sell Keita and I don't think they will yet. They'd lose alot of money too. Can't see it.
Why? They were looking to bring in an attacking midfielder with Keita, and Henderson is getting on a bit now. If they were to sell him they’d somehow end up making a profit anyway - it’s amazing how much they get for all their rejects!
Henderson is arguably their most important player. He's going nowhere. Nor is Fabinho.
Ultimately this is the issue they will have now.
We have just built a good team based on a double pivot and we want to play 2 10s (one of whom is a left winger ) because one manager in the history of the sport has had success doing that. Not realistic for me
last sentence misses the point I think... if we can sign one player this summer for silly money, we would be insane to sign a left winger, even if we can shoe horn him into other positions.I think that part of why Brazilian footballers were so good in the 90s and 00s is because trainers didn't care about this "player X doesn't work with player Y" bullshit.
You were a good baller, you were in the team, period. Players with talent found a way to make it work, that's a byproduct of creativity and imagination.
Nowadays managers want very specific players to do very specific teams in a very specific positions. After years doing the same thing, those players become very unidimensional and look useless if you move them two yards beyond their "natural" position.
You say the club wants Grealish and Bruno? Great. Can't have too much talent. Both great intelligent players, they would work, no matter what the wanker FMers think.
I agree but I personally can't see someone like Grealish being happy with a rotation role.Grealish to cover Rashford/Bruno and Sancho for the LW/RW
We need depth in the squad people keep forgetting this. Our first 11 can't play 3 games a week at a high level.
I agree but I personally can't see someone like Grealish being happy with a rotation role.
Who's he taking those 40 starts off though? His two best positions are LW where Rashford plays and #10 where Fernandes plays, can't see him benching either of them for 20 games a season, especially if we advanced deep into competitions when we'd want to be playing our best 11s. I've not seen a great deal to suggest we'll play a 3-man midfield either, even when everyone was fit earlier in the season Solskjaer still opted for the double pivot. I think he'd be an unbelievably good option for rotation and I'd be happy if he joined but like I said, I'm not convinced he'd come here for that.Then he will stay at Villa forever. Stepping up to a bigger club means rotation. Only the absolute top players don’t get rotated.
Between LW, No10 and games in 3-man midfield you could easily find 40 starts for him with 15 sub appearances.