MrBurns
Full Member
Originally posted by caphillips999:
<strong>DIFFICULT TO SAY....BUT JUDGE HIM ON HIS ABILITY NOT HIS EXIT FROM THE CLUB.
A GIANT</strong><hr></blockquote>
Take your caps lock off.
Originally posted by caphillips999:
<strong>DIFFICULT TO SAY....BUT JUDGE HIM ON HIS ABILITY NOT HIS EXIT FROM THE CLUB.
A GIANT</strong><hr></blockquote>
Take your caps lock off.
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>Better for the long term. In Ferdinand, Brown and O'Shea we now have three of the best and young centre halves in the league.</strong><hr></blockquote>
in the world in my opinion
Originally posted by Keano's Mental Demons:
[QB]Before Stam left you, you were regarded as the best team in the land.
You were the team to beat.
Like it or not, now Arsenal are.
I'm not going to suggest that the two are directly linked but one thing is for sure; Stam leaving certainly didn't help.
<hr></blockquote>
2001 we ended up with 80 points, last season 77 so in reality we were only three points worse, and our 80 wouldn't have been enough as Arse improved 17 points and got 87.
In 1999/2000 we had a fantastic league season but in 2000/01 our easy title was as much down to poor opposition as to the quality of our play.
Originally posted by osterdal:
<strong>
2001 we ended up with 80 points, last season 77 so in reality we were only three points worse, and our 80 wouldn't have been enough as Arse improved 17 points and got 87.
In 1999/2000 we had a fantastic league season but in 2000/01 our easy title was as much down to poor opposition as to the quality of our play.</strong><hr></blockquote>
What's your point?
That you collected almost as many points without Stam as you did with him, so his presence didn't make that much difference?