West Brom's execs loved those loans with mandatory purchases, probably for an easier structuring of the transfer payments.We loaned Tomasz Kuszczak a few years ago for reasons I was not clear on. I'm guessing its financially a better deal for them to loan rather than buy at this time.
Now he hands in a transfer request? Now? Poor Mourinho must be fecking devastated
Agreed. I just find it fecking hilarious how Mourinho was desperate to bring him in for 2 summers straight and within weeks of him being sacked he hands in a transfer requestThank feck he didn't hand in a transfer request when Mourinho was here. We would be left with yet more dross in the squad on huge wages.
Agreed. I just find it fecking hilarious how Mourinho was desperate to bring him in for 2 summers straight and within weeks of him being sacked he hands in a transfer request
A classic example of why Mourinho's methods flat out suck. He wanted Perisic at all costs and complained that he didn't get him. Would get one good season out of him before he turns into mid table level and someone we'd look into replacing again. Pretty much how it is with Matic. How Sanchez instantly isn't needed without even having good performances. How it would be with Alderweireld or Willian. People criticize Woodward, but thank feck he is the way he was because he didn't let Mourinho ruin us long term.
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.
Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.
If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:
Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.
Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.
Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
There's a fire in the kitchen and we're shopping for a new TV. We're gonna drain 35M of our already small budget on a 30y old who might or might not be okay.We don't need him because he is natural in left wing position. But for Arsenal it is good signing. He is huge upgrade on Iwobi
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.
Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.
If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:
Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.
Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.
Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Off the topic; what is up with your transfer budget? You have maybe the healthiest financial situation in PL and you are not spending moneyThere's a fire in the kitchen and we're shopping for a new TV. We're gonna drain 35M of our already small budget on a 30y old who might or might not be okay.
I watch a fair bit of Inter and he's been very out of sorts whenever I've seen him this season, I think his head's been away from Inter for a while personally.His output this season has been abysmal, even Mata who's our 6th choice in attack has better output than him.
I watch a fair bit of Inter and he's been very out of sorts whenever I've seen him this season, I think his head's been away from Inter for a while personally.
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.
Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.
If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:
Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.
Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.
Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Check the Arsenal thread, lots of reasons, some are true some are not, nobody really knows but if we end up on February 1st with only Perisic and or/Suarez, it is not going to end well.Off the topic; what is up with your transfer budget? You have maybe the healthiest financial situation in PL and you are not spending money
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.
Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.
If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:
Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.
Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.
Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
Nothing wrong - it was what Jose had wanted.Oh my god
Nothing wrong - it was what Jose had wanted.
Ed isn't a seasoned pro but he was spot on with those players . His only mistake was not getting a defender .
Finally .. thanks for this sensible post.Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.
What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.
"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits
The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.
What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."
Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
He was one of the key players to take Croatia to the finals at the world cup. I think he never recovered from the summer yet, could look very different next season with some rest and full preseason at the club.
Its theft. Why hasn't someone bought them out ffs?Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.
What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.
"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits
The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.
What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."
Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.
What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.
"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits
The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.
What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."
Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
The dividends paid to the Glazers in the most recent accounts come to £22m of £44m profit,Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.
What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.
"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits
The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.
What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."
Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.