It's not the players fault!

It's on the players to some extent; if they're not good enough they're simply not good enough.

No manager on Earth turns Wout Weghorst into Robin van Persie, you know?

Even with a great manager there is a ceiling to what our players can accomplish. We don't have a single world class player in our squad, so we're not going to ever be competing with City or Arsenal or even Liverpool with this lot.
 
Despite all this talk of how we're not a "sacking club", unconditional support from our fanbase only applies to our managers. Fans have no problem calling for the players, assistant coaches, analysts, and the kitman to be sacked or sold when things aren't going well.
 
Despite all this talk of how we're not a "sacking club", unconditional support from our fanbase only applies to our managers. Fans have no problem calling for the players, assistant coaches, analysts, and the kitman to be sacked or sold when things aren't going well.
True. Zirkzee and Ugarte threads are good examples of that.
 
Who is Rambo?

The guy who can't stop talking about his military action in Iraq. My grandfather was an AA gunner in the hottest zone and in the most bombed country in the world per sqm (WW2) and I heard less stories from him about the war then howson (football channel)
 
I feel like our fanbase wants a clear cut issue to point at but the truth is, it is a collection of things. Re players, for me there is a core of players who I feel need to be moved on before we can really evolve as a team. Even forgetting ETH, let's say there was a new man in today, what changes? Suddenly players try harder as it matters again? We might get a bounce but the senior players do not suddenly become better.

I can't tell if we just overrate our players massively (I have seen Maguire, Dalot, Rashford, Bruno, Shaw from the old guard referred to without irony over the years as best in the league or even more than that). The amount of coaches we have churned through through makes me think there is at least some issue with our players and the types of personality we recruit - even someone like Dalot who is supposedly an excellent trainer does inexcusable things like for Spurs 1st goal. No coach would even consider a defender not marking their man, it is just what you do as a player at all levels of the game. If you get beaten by them for pace or get caught out of position, then fine but to simply give up on tracking them for no reason is mental. This happens all over the pitch, Bruno will press and leave huge gaps, Rashford will lose the ball about 10 times a game allowing continuous counters down that side, our CBs this year have been toilet in one on ones, Case seems to be only playing Hollywood passes or passes to the opposition this year and Garnacho refuses to pass in any capacity. You can name any player and there are issues maybe bar Onana who seems to be filling the tragic gap left by DDG, when he was good, where our GK becomes our key player.
 
its a combination but it obviously starts with the manager. There are teams with much worse quality players on much lower wages who play better football. And if a big name player isnt doing what you want, you need to pick someone else and make sure they understand they are in the team to do what you wanted.

We play slow buildup from the back because the manager wants it.
 
I feel like our fanbase wants a clear cut issue to point at but the truth is, it is a collection of things. Re players, for me there is a core of players who I feel need to be moved on before we can really evolve as a team. Even forgetting ETH, let's say there was a new man in today, what changes? Suddenly players try harder as it matters again? We might get a bounce but the senior players do not suddenly become better.

I can't tell if we just overrate our players massively (I have seen Maguire, Dalot, Rashford, Bruno, Shaw from the old guard referred to without irony over the years as best in the league or even more than that). The amount of coaches we have churned through through makes me think there is at least some issue with our players and the types of personality we recruit - even someone like Dalot who is supposedly an excellent trainer does inexcusable things like for Spurs 1st goal. No coach would even consider a defender not marking their man, it is just what you do as a player at all levels of the game. If you get beaten by them for pace or get caught out of position, then fine but to simply give up on tracking them for no reason is mental. This happens all over the pitch, Bruno will press and leave huge gaps, Rashford will lose the ball about 10 times a game allowing continuous counters down that side, our CBs this year have been toilet in one on ones, Case seems to be only playing Hollywood passes or passes to the opposition this year and Garnacho refuses to pass in any capacity. You can name any player and there are issues maybe bar Onana who seems to be filling the tragic gap left by DDG, when he was good, where our GK becomes our key player.

I was the standard bearer of 'the players are undermining the manager' brigade. But that argument grew weaker and weaker throughout the past months. I mean look at this squad. Its basically Ajax V2.0. The defense + keeper is ETH's former players, we've got Eriksen and Antony in midfield (+ ETH's signing Casemiro) and Zirkzee/Hojlund upfront. Even our assistants speak Dutch. So why aren't they implementing his vision? Is Rashford or Bruno the culprit? Then why are they the cornerstone of ETH's team? Should we get rid of Garnacho or Mainoo? Is Dalot to blame? Or could it be the case that the manager is massively out of depth? I mean he only have to modes of play, the high press BS he uses were the FB go up and never come back. Alternatively he revers to a less effective and far more boring version of Oleball.

And yes the squad is massively overrated but its still a side that, if properly managed, should end between 4th-6th place. We ended 8th place last season and we're 14th at the moment.

Ajax hasn't produced a top manager since 1991-97 ie LVG. The likes of Koeman had a very underwhelming managerial career outside the local pond. De Boer won 5 league titles with Ajax and still hold the honor of being the worst manager the EPL and the Serie A has ever seen which speaks volumes of how difficult it is for an Ajax manager to do well elsewhere. So why should we trust ETH? What makes him so good to deserve such trust?
 
Goldbridge doesn't deserve discussion or anyone's attention. He is terrible.
 
I pay no attention to Goldbridge and Howsen and I was thinking the same thing until I listened to Phil Jones and he said the players arnt trying. He said that Spurs game was nothing to do with tactics but just the players not doing the basics i.e. running. And I have to agree somewhat. The riddle is why is always United players. And its not as if its the same players or the same manager. Its happened with completely different sets of players and different managers. We also keep saying we have no leaders. But there is Casemiro, De Ligt, Bruno, Maguire, Eriksen, Shaw etc - these are all top professionals. Surely they aren't just standing there accepting players not putting in a shift.
The reality is probably somewhere in the middle where its part manager part players. But its fkng baffling how this just keeps happening to us.
 
The players aren't free from criticism for me, they bear as much responsibility as Ten Hag does, obviously I want Ten Hag gone, but I really think the players do not put their best foot forward and I hope when we get a new manager, he is brave enough to drop them and even play young players ahead of them if necessary.

2 or 3 players being out of form might be acceptable and you as a manager could drop them, but when the whole team is out of form, for a such continuous period, you have to start asking questions beyond sacking the manager here.
 
Collective responsibility.

Player's fault, coach's fault, our fault.

It's not not the player's fault.
 
in order of most fault - INEOS, Ten Hag, scouting dept, physios, players.
 
Ten Hag football is a delicate flower. It is hard to bring to bloom and cannot withstand the harsh conditions of the EPL. We need something more robust.
 
He just called Van Basten overrated.

Goldbridge is a feckin' cretin who knows less about football than my cat.

ETA The fact that he has somehow managed to establish himself as someone people actually listen to - and reference - is an indictment of the current era.

And no - as I've said before, I don't automatically dismiss anyone with a YouTube channel. It's about him, specifically: he's a feckin' idiot (who has been provided with a platform in the current era...and, yes, this is absolutely a problem in or with the current era: the providing-idiots-with-a-platform problem).
 
Last edited:
The guy who can't stop talking about his military action in Iraq. My grandfather was an AA gunner in the hottest zone and in the most bombed country in the world per sqm (WW2) and I heard less stories from him about the war then howson (football channel)
Ah ok. Yeah he’s annoying
 
I've listened to Goldfish on odd occasion, hes not got much different to say than the rest on YouTube etc. Talkshite got a utd channel on YouTube now as well that's crap imo it's just a justified way of sticking the knife in. Howsen I've done same with him and his team, they all seem to say same thing.
Imo the players are to blame as well as the manager.
 
These issues I see are
  1. The players we have, play within themselves and not as a team.
  2. The simple things are still missing ( Jose called it out). Players would rather do Hollywood style passing instead of pass and move. I don't think any manager or coach wants players to do extravagant things.
  3. We are a tactically rigid team. which is because of two things above and tactics not suited to the player profile we have. We have technical players and players with vibes. These two don't mix.
  4. The combination of players are manager is no where close to title winning caliber. We are a top 6 team at best
Set expectations upfront. This holds good for INEOS too, stop with the we will win title in 3 years nonsense. We need to define a style of play now and then invest in bringing the right talent.
 
I feel like our fanbase wants a clear cut issue to point at but the truth is, it is a collection of things. Re players, for me there is a core of players who I feel need to be moved on before we can really evolve as a team. Even forgetting ETH, let's say there was a new man in today, what changes? Suddenly players try harder as it matters again? We might get a bounce but the senior players do not suddenly become better.

I can't tell if we just overrate our players massively (I have seen Maguire, Dalot, Rashford, Bruno, Shaw from the old guard referred to without irony over the years as best in the league or even more than that). The amount of coaches we have churned through through makes me think there is at least some issue with our players and the types of personality we recruit - even someone like Dalot who is supposedly an excellent trainer does inexcusable things like for Spurs 1st goal. No coach would even consider a defender not marking their man, it is just what you do as a player at all levels of the game. If you get beaten by them for pace or get caught out of position, then fine but to simply give up on tracking them for no reason is mental. This happens all over the pitch, Bruno will press and leave huge gaps, Rashford will lose the ball about 10 times a game allowing continuous counters down that side, our CBs this year have been toilet in one on ones, Case seems to be only playing Hollywood passes or passes to the opposition this year and Garnacho refuses to pass in any capacity. You can name any player and there are issues maybe bar Onana who seems to be filling the tragic gap left by DDG, when he was good, where our GK becomes our key player.
Well said, I agree. It definitely is a combination of factors. And while I can live with sacking ETH, I think, the team would benefit from ripping a few players out as well. That being said, I can understand the dilemma to a degree. I mean, they all see that it isn't working and probably they also know it is a combination of the tactics and their ability to follow the instructions and maybe, they hope that ETH would adjust at some point, and even we as fans said at different points in time, that he should adapt - we know he can because he did in his first season. Him not doing it again, has to mean something. I always had the feeling, that he put all his eggs in Brunos and Rashfords basket... thinking that somehow those two in a functional team will lift the rest. But it isn't happening and eventually, he will go down for it.
its a combination but it obviously starts with the manager. There are teams with much worse quality players on much lower wages who play better football. And if a big name player isnt doing what you want, you need to pick someone else and make sure they understand they are in the team to do what you wanted.

We play slow buildup from the back because the manager wants it.
We play slow buildup? Not sure, if I would agree to that. Also the first halves against either Fulham and Brighton this season showed that the potential of good interplay is there. Question is why does it evaporate so quickly. Apart from that I agree, managers should be ready to drop anybody that doesn't perform. No matter the name.
I was the standard bearer of 'the players are undermining the manager' brigade. But that argument grew weaker and weaker throughout the past months. I mean look at this squad. Its basically Ajax V2.0. The defense + keeper is ETH's former players, we've got Eriksen and Antony in midfield (+ ETH's signing Casemiro) and Zirkzee/Hojlund upfront. Even our assistants speak Dutch. So why aren't they implementing his vision? Is Rashford or Bruno the culprit? Then why are they the cornerstone of ETH's team? Should we get rid of Garnacho or Mainoo? Is Dalot to blame?
I think we can all agree, that our recruitment has been bad for quite some time. The fact that ETH is part of that issue shouldn't be mixed up with how his coaching should be judged. I think, it is safe to say, that he doesn't get the best out of his players, but who knows, maybe he thinks too much of some of them. Dalot, Shaw, Rashford, Bruno... Each has been talked up but are they the ones when the going gets tough? Is identification of talent should be judged separately, otherwise those discussions will go in circles endlessly.
Or could it be the case that the manager is massively out of depth? I mean he only have to modes of play, the high press BS he uses were the FB go up and never come back. Alternatively he revers to a less effective and far more boring version of Oleball.
He may very well be out of his depth. I wouldn't be so quick to judge the tactics though. Because what you describe could very plausibly be explained by him wanting to play a high press but due to players not being able to he has to revert to other ideas. And thats not me protecting him, he should be able to come up with temporary solutions when he notices that his intended plan isn't working but the tactics he is trying to implement aren't wrong per se. We, and that means him and the players, don't seem to be able to execute them properly.
And yes the squad is massively overrated but its still a side that, if properly managed, should end between 4th-6th place. We ended 8th place last season and we're 14th at the moment.
After only a few matches. No question the trend is alarming and I agree, something has to be done to stop the bleeding. But I am fairly sure, if that is the single one objective for this year, a 6th place for example, there is a good chance, that ETH is able to make that happen as well. Again, we know he can be pragmatic. We have to expect more from our manager than to get results by playing lower table tactics - no question about it. But also we aren't going to wake up one day and suddenly being able to press in an organized unit. The work has to be put in and it will go wrong along the way, as it did with other teams as well. By all means, get rid of Erik, but please make sure, to bring in somebody with the same principles.
Ajax hasn't produced a top manager since 1991-97 ie LVG. The likes of Koeman had a very underwhelming managerial career outside the local pond. De Boer won 5 league titles with Ajax and still hold the honor of being the worst manager the EPL and the Serie A has ever seen which speaks volumes of how difficult it is for an Ajax manager to do well elsewhere. So why should we trust ETH? What makes him so good to deserve such trust?
I think, you are arguing against the wrong things at this point. I haven't seen a group of fans indicating we should do this. There is one loud (maybe even hysterical) group that screams for his head (to a degree understandably though some expressions very un-classy) and the only ones that don't join into the mob, aren't his fans, just wanting to dampen the impulsiveness.

Bringing in the wrong manager could lead to another cancelling out of "invested effort and time" like the Mou after LVG decision, completely contradicting ideas of football. Something like that has to be avoided at all costs.
 
Well said, I agree. It definitely is a combination of factors. And while I can live with sacking ETH, I think, the team would benefit from ripping a few players out as well. That being said, I can understand the dilemma to a degree. I mean, they all see that it isn't working and probably they also know it is a combination of the tactics and their ability to follow the instructions and maybe, they hope that ETH would adjust at some point, and even we as fans said at different points in time, that he should adapt - we know he can because he did in his first season. Him not doing it again, has to mean something. I always had the feeling, that he put all his eggs in Brunos and Rashfords basket... thinking that somehow those two in a functional team will lift the rest. But it isn't happening and eventually, he will go down for it.

We play slow buildup? Not sure, if I would agree to that. Also the first halves against either Fulham and Brighton this season showed that the potential of good interplay is there. Question is why does it evaporate so quickly. Apart from that I agree, managers should be ready to drop anybody that doesn't perform. No matter the name.

I think we can all agree, that our recruitment has been bad for quite some time. The fact that ETH is part of that issue shouldn't be mixed up with how his coaching should be judged. I think, it is safe to say, that he doesn't get the best out of his players, but who knows, maybe he thinks too much of some of them. Dalot, Shaw, Rashford, Bruno... Each has been talked up but are they the ones when the going gets tough? Is identification of talent should be judged separately, otherwise those discussions will go in circles endlessly.

He may very well be out of his depth. I wouldn't be so quick to judge the tactics though. Because what you describe could very plausibly be explained by him wanting to play a high press but due to players not being able to he has to revert to other ideas. And thats not me protecting him, he should be able to come up with temporary solutions when he notices that his intended plan isn't working but the tactics he is trying to implement aren't wrong per se. We, and that means him and the players, don't seem to be able to execute them properly.

After only a few matches. No question the trend is alarming and I agree, something has to be done to stop the bleeding. But I am fairly sure, if that is the single one objective for this year, a 6th place for example, there is a good chance, that ETH is able to make that happen as well. Again, we know he can be pragmatic. We have to expect more from our manager than to get results by playing lower table tactics - no question about it. But also we aren't going to wake up one day and suddenly being able to press in an organized unit. The work has to be put in and it will go wrong along the way, as it did with other teams as well. By all means, get rid of Erik, but please make sure, to bring in somebody with the same principles.

I think, you are arguing against the wrong things at this point. I haven't seen a group of fans indicating we should do this. There is one loud (maybe even hysterical) group that screams for his head (to a degree understandably though some expressions very un-classy) and the only ones that don't join into the mob, aren't his fans, just wanting to dampen the impulsiveness.

Bringing in the wrong manager could lead to another cancelling out of "invested effort and time" like the Mou after LVG decision, completely contradicting ideas of football. Something like that has to be avoided at all costs.

Our players play slowly out of the backline its only Bruno halfway up the pitch or a ball over the top from Casemiro where we accelerate the play, or a winger like Rashford running the ball from deep that has any speed to it. Keeper gets it, slow passing from CBs, fullbacks and midfield until 30 seconds later when thy try to get the ball to one of our wingers or Bruno.
 
Or not exactly

I find the likes of Howson and Goldfish latest 'our players are charlatans' to defend the manager as hilarious

a- this is mostly ETH's team with a big chunk of those players having played either under him (Antony, De Ligt, Mazraoui, Martinez, Eriksen) or are from the same pool he came from. Did he saddle us with loads of charlatans then?
b- the rest are players that he and his best mate Rio keep defending. I am referring to the likes of Rashy, Mainoo, Mount and Maguire. Are they charlatans?

English Rambo/Sir Alex should really name and shame whom the charlatans are!

I do think that we have a lack of commitment in the team :cough: Shaw :cough: but is eclipsed by a mix of horrible tactics and a serious lack of talent particularly upfront.

Well, as least they have changed their tune from "these players have thrown so many former managers under the bus".

He has made 15 permanent signings. 5 he managed at Ajax. 2 additional are his countrymen. Mount he liked from his loan spell in the Eredivisie and Hojlund is managed by the same agent as Ten Hag (whos brother also works at that agency).

There is not one Premier League manager that has been allowed to go back and sign so many of his old boys.

4 of this back 5 for the Porto and Spurs games played under him at Ajax, yet he still get get them looking like a defence.
 
I was the standard bearer of 'the players are undermining the manager' brigade. But that argument grew weaker and weaker throughout the past months. I mean look at this squad. Its basically Ajax V2.0. The defense + keeper is ETH's former players, we've got Eriksen and Antony in midfield (+ ETH's signing Casemiro) and Zirkzee/Hojlund upfront. Even our assistants speak Dutch. So why aren't they implementing his vision? Is Rashford or Bruno the culprit? Then why are they the cornerstone of ETH's team? Should we get rid of Garnacho or Mainoo? Is Dalot to blame? Or could it be the case that the manager is massively out of depth? I mean he only have to modes of play, the high press BS he uses were the FB go up and never come back. Alternatively he revers to a less effective and far more boring version of Oleball.

And yes the squad is massively overrated but its still a side that, if properly managed, should end between 4th-6th place. We ended 8th place last season and we're 14th at the moment.

Ajax hasn't produced a top manager since 1991-97 ie LVG. The likes of Koeman had a very underwhelming managerial career outside the local pond. De Boer won 5 league titles with Ajax and still hold the honor of being the worst manager the EPL and the Serie A has ever seen which speaks volumes of how difficult it is for an Ajax manager to do well elsewhere. So why should we trust ETH? What makes him so good to deserve such trust?
I'm not by any means saying we should not be seeing better than we are, there is a clear issue somewhere in the setup and I would guess the relationship between the dressing room and coaches is divided/ quite cliquey although not as bad as it was previously. Sometimes I think football with all its money these days and stats means people want to find a complex solution to a simple problem, our issue as soon as we stopped playing the more pragmatic setup from ETH's first season after the first two games is simply that we keep giving the ball away in idiotic areas and at a high frequency.

I blame the coaches mostly for not stamping their power on the team, if a player repeat offends they should be dropped i.e. Bruno, Case in particular with terrible passes/losses of possession. But then I also wonder at what point you have to ask yourself how much mollycoddling should a manager be expected to do?

Ineos are clearly doing a lot behind the scenes, they've hired a load of people and heir recruitment is already a little different with next to no older names linked and their oldest singing being Max who was a good deal if he stays fit whilst retaining sell on value at his age.
 
Well said, I agree. It definitely is a combination of factors. And while I can live with sacking ETH, I think, the team would benefit from ripping a few players out as well. That being said, I can understand the dilemma to a degree. I mean, they all see that it isn't working and probably they also know it is a combination of the tactics and their ability to follow the instructions and maybe, they hope that ETH would adjust at some point, and even we as fans said at different points in time, that he should adapt - we know he can because he did in his first season. Him not doing it again, has to mean something. I always had the feeling, that he put all his eggs in Brunos and Rashfords basket... thinking that somehow those two in a functional team will lift the rest. But it isn't happening and eventually, he will go down for it.
I am the opposite and hoped he would not adapt and he would go up against the players, put some authority in place + force his style on to the team. I think that is what these players need, someone to put a bit of fear back into them and I think he's tried, looking at the crap he dealt with from Ronaldo and his treatment of Sancho, but the results simply have not followed and it's undermined him.
 
I'm not by any means saying we should not be seeing better than we are, there is a clear issue somewhere in the setup and I would guess the relationship between the dressing room and coaches is divided/ quite cliquey although not as bad as it was previously. Sometimes I think football with all its money these days and stats means people want to find a complex solution to a simple problem, our issue as soon as we stopped playing the more pragmatic setup from ETH's first season after the first two games is simply that we keep giving the ball away in idiotic areas and at a high frequency.

I blame the coaches mostly for not stamping their power on the team, if a player repeat offends they should be dropped i.e. Bruno, Case in particular with terrible passes/losses of possession. But then I also wonder at what point you have to ask yourself how much mollycoddling should a manager be expected to do?

Ineos are clearly doing a lot behind the scenes, they've hired a load of people and heir recruitment is already a little different with next to no older names linked and their oldest singing being Max who was a good deal if he stays fit whilst retaining sell on value at his age.

I was one of the first to point out that our football structure was in a horrible state. I was never impressed by Murtough, I thought that Woodward was a clown from day 1 and I always insisted that the whole structure needed revamping. But in the past year or so things had changed radically. Ashworth, Wilcox and Berrada are genuinely good, our assistants are manager standard in all but name and the likes of Georgson are elite. Is it work in progress? Sure. But there's absolutely no reason why we shouldn't have seem some progression this year. We spent over 200m+ on transfers (mostly ETH's men), we barely have any injuries of note, we got rid of most of the bad apples and even Rashford seem to have put his shit in order. I am not putting the blame solely on ETH but this is mostly his fault.
 
Well, as least they have changed their tune from "these players have thrown so many former managers under the bus".

He has made 15 permanent signings. 5 he managed at Ajax. 2 additional are his countrymen. Mount he liked from his loan spell in the Eredivisie and Hojlund is managed by the same agent as Ten Hag (whos brother also works at that agency).

There is not one Premier League manager that has been allowed to go back and sign so many of his old boys.

4 of this back 5 for the Porto and Spurs games played under him at Ajax, yet he still get get them looking like a defence.

they changed the tune to 'these players are charlatans' ie the players ETH had brought in. Which makes me wonder. If ETH had spent hundreds of millions on charlatans then whose the biggest charlatan of them all? Hey hey hey!
 
they changed the tune to 'these players are charlatans' ie the players ETH had brought in. Which makes me wonder. If ETH had spent hundreds of millions on charlatans then whose the biggest charlatan of them all? Hey hey hey!

Im not sure why, but some of these fan channels just won't call for a manager to be sacked.
 
It's clear as day that there is a system issue. No team in the Premier league (or much further afield tbf) are so incredibly easy to play against
The goals we concede are often the simplest pieces of play you'll see in the game and they happen over and over again.

Our players might be garbage but until this system issue is fixed I feel like it's impossible to judge them fairly. No one playing in this shape is capable of thriving imo
Completely agree.
 
I was one of the first to point out that our football structure was in a horrible state. I was never impressed by Murtough, I thought that Woodward was a clown from day 1 and I always insisted that the whole structure needed revamping. But in the past year or so things had changed radically. Ashworth, Wilcox and Berrada are genuinely good, our assistants are manager standard in all but name and the likes of Georgson are elite. Is it work in progress? Sure. But there's absolutely no reason why we shouldn't have seem some progression this year. We spent over 200m+ on transfers (mostly ETH's men), we barely have any injuries of note, we got rid of most of the bad apples and even Rashford seem to have put his shit in order. I am not putting the blame solely on ETH but this is mostly his fault.
I'm not sure how much I would split it but both are to blame for sure, not sure re Rashford either, his stats re possession loss are incredibly bad this year. The midfield setup though is on ETH, though again I feel he simply has to drop Bruno for it to work and he seemingly will never do that and ultimately he has to take the blame for that.
 
Rotten culture.

Our ex players that got out of our environment seems to be doing better, or to the very least functioning well

You can say United is probably above their level, but we're really making them much worse, and this is instance keeps on happening again and again.

Very few have left United and performed well at the same level of football or higher. It's literally one or two. They've all generally dropped to a lower standard and had decent careers there.

However this is the first time post Fergie that I'd say the system, tactics and managers approach are the main problem. As opposed to player quality/recruitment.