I don’t think it’s calculated to do so. I don’t know much about her specifically but Israelis who engage in that kind of rhetoric tend to believe that worldwide antisemitism (as they understand it) is the status quo whatever Israel’s actions, and that in the context of the Middle East mass displays of Israeli power/force/“strength” are the only real means to counter its effects. Particularly so when Israel has just been made to look incredibly weak and dumb.
@2cents do they see it in their interests to increase anti-Semitism worldwide? They seem to be going out of their way (this+ all the stars of David in the Gazan ruins) to make the association between the religion anf murderous violence as prominent as possible, somewhat like ISIS.
Sadly enough, he is from Tennessee. There will be no repercussions from such atrocious speech.was he really referring to Palestinian children? Can he say that without consequences?
He absolutely can, and he 100% meant it too.was he really referring to Palestinian children? Can he say that without consequences?
including this footage, which shows him detonating houses. He describes the detonation of civilians' houses as one of the "Coolest and most interesting things" that he did.
Its fine, Geriatric Joe will sanction a few more settlers (who will laugh it off) and claim the US is already doing enough, all the while legislating to ban boycotts and ordering his UNSC rep to veto any resolution aimed at condemning said settlements.
When did the US start parroting Russian talking points. Crazy world
Something something tunnels... something something Hamas.
Do you listen to yourself? They bombed people who are starving and desperate for food and this is your reaction? feck me...Well yeah, Hamas runs their operations and data centre under UNRWA premises so they cannot be trusted
Israel seems to have stopped trying to show tunnels that they've found. You'd think with most of Gaza flattened, depopulated and in ruins, they'd be uncovering tunnels left, right and centre. Probably realised that they don't have to bother pretending any more.Well yeah, Hamas runs their operations and data centre under UNRWA premises so they cannot be trusted
It’s appears once again Israel was lying
It’s appears once again Israel was lying
WSJ said:In the new report, which was completed last week, the U.S.’s National Intelligence Council, a group of veteran intelligence analysts, said it assessed with “low confidence” that a handful of Unrwa staffers participated in the Oct. 7 attack, those familiar with the findings said.
A low-confidence assessment indicates that the U.S. intelligence community believes the claims are plausible but cannot make a stronger assertion because it doesn’t have its own independent confirmation. The U.S. concluded the claims are “credible,” a U.S. official said.
I’m curious as to what you’d need to start doubting Israel/your preconceptions? Because they’ve said so many things that have turned out to be inflated or outright lies.Well yeah, Hamas runs their operations and data centre under UNRWA premises so they cannot be trusted
It’s appears once again Israel was lying
Spox John Kirby when inevitably asked about this: we continue to closely cooperate with Israel and if we have concerns, we'll share those concerns.
I get that Israel is a strategic alley in the region but at some point there’s got to be a level of self respect from the United States.Low confidence = credible = stop funding aid. Great job, good effort, carry on.
Well yeah, Hamas runs their operations and data centre under UNRWA premises so they cannot be trusted
Was it actually false? Or was it exaggerated?Sigh. This was proved to be yet another load of absolute bollocks. How can you keep repeating this stuff when there is no evidence to support it aside from the initial accusations that normally come right before somewhere is attacked or straight after it was destroyed. You continuously ask others for proof of what they post yet you constantly post relentless accusations and outright lies.
Was it actually false? Or was it exaggerated?
I get that there are more questions than answers. But the pictures in this article about the data centers are...fake then?The reports by media that found the claims of dozens of UNWRA employees working for Hamas to be false, it seems the claims about the operations and data centre are also unverified too
They allegedly found a tunnel network close to the building but there was no operations or data centre, and it wasn't directly underneath as claimed in the post I quoted or as claimed in many pro Israel media outlets. As with everything climed so far there is no irrefutable evidence and lots more questions than answers.
“You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people. [Addressing the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization Yasser Arafat]”
― Hafez Assad
They need to discuss many things. This might be a good start to deliberate on:
Yes. Thats why they need to discuss it, if son thinks the same.You realise Hafez Assad died 24 years ago right?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-palestinian-women-are-credible-un-panel-says
So by the same token the IDF are a bunch of rapist child killers like Hamas
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...-states-wont-support-palestinians-qa-00142277What’s noteworthy in this entire conflict since Oct. 7 has been the lack of reaction or response from the Arab world. Saudi Arabia continues to hold the door open for a peace agreement with Israel. The UAE, Morocco and Bahrain didn’t even withdraw ambassadors. Jordan did, but of course with about half of its population being Palestinian, Jordan has a particular problem. That lack of reaction I think is very telling. If you needed another example that Arab states are not viscerally concerned about the Palestinians and their fate, this would be it.
First it's important to quote the question " So far, Arab states have not permitted the resettlement of Palestinians in their territory. What’s struck you most about their response to Israel’s war in Gaza? "Thought this was an interesting read.
Arab States Are Giving Palestinians the Cold Shoulder. Here’s Why.
https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...-states-wont-support-palestinians-qa-00142277
First it's important to quote the question " So far, Arab states have not permitted the resettlement of Palestinians in their territory. What’s struck you most about their response to Israel’s war in Gaza? "
Now why would anyone that remotely cares for palestinians right to have a state ease the process of palestinians losing Palestine? Because facilitating an exodus is the best way to Israel to take even more land. It's also worth mentioning that the amount of palestinians that have already immigrated to these countries is pretty significant, it's roughly the same amount that remained in Palestine.
The other thing is that the point made isn't one, at least not when you take into account the fact that we are not talking about a new context, we are talking about more than half of century where the nations that actually have power have sided with Israel, there isn't actually much that Arab states can do they hold no power, they can't bribe their way into a better outcome and they can't fight their way into one either unless they want to be absolutely atomized by a US led coalition.
I interpreted it not as the Arab states can't do anything but rather they are not interested in doing anything at all beyond rhetoric support. Obviously they wouldn't be interested in facilitating a Palestinian exodus. But he mentions how certain countries haven't even recalled ambassadors and things like that.First it's important to quote the question " So far, Arab states have not permitted the resettlement of Palestinians in their territory. What’s struck you most about their response to Israel’s war in Gaza? "
Now why would anyone that remotely cares for palestinians right to have a state ease the process of palestinians losing Palestine? Because facilitating an exodus is the best way to Israel to take even more land. It's also worth mentioning that the amount of palestinians that have already immigrated to these countries is pretty significant, it's roughly the same amount that remained in Palestine.
The other thing is that the point made isn't one, at least not when you take into account the fact that we are not talking about a new context, we are talking about more than half of century where the nations that actually have power have sided with Israel, there isn't actually much that Arab states can do they hold no power, they can't bribe their way into a better outcome and they can't fight their way into one either unless they want to be absolutely atomized by a US led coalition.
I interpreted it not as the Arab states can't do anything but rather they are not interested in doing anything at all beyond rhetoric support. Obviously they wouldn't be interested in facilitating a Palestinian exodus. But he mentions how certain countries haven't even recalled ambassadors and things like that.
By the way, is taking in Ukrainian refugees also a way for Russia to take more land? Does the same framing apply there?
