Forevergiggs1
Full Member
The same as Mous but better than VG which let's face it isn't an exceptionally high bar.
2nd place is great, even if the competition is mediocre. Mourinho finished second though, so I'm hesitant to get too excited lest it turn out to be yet another false dawn. Going out of the CL at the group stages (having been in such a strong position) and exiting the FA Cup at the quarters to Leicester needs to be acknowledged. I think he's earned another year and next season is make or break as to whether it's working.Yes, which is what I'm saying. So as of now, he's really only meeting the expectations that I went into this season with. Finishing 2nd or 3rd doesn't really make any odds to me tbh. I wanted a comfortable top four finish, and barring some crazy catastrophe, he'll have achieved that. I fancy us to win the EL, but of course anything can happen.
Mourinho finished second though, so I'm hesitant to get too excited lest it turn out to be yet another false dawn.
Yes, I understand that - but who has actually called it anything but a good result (which it was) and a standard/average/normal/whatever performance away in Europe?
I may have missed it, but I haven't seen anyone hailing the performance. Just the usual reactions from Ole-inners to Ole-outers being overly negative.
The same as Mous but better than VG which let's face it isn't an exceptionally high bar.
There never seems to be a middle ground and that is what i was trying to say.
Absolutely. If we can win our games in hand we'll be 8 points behind which would be encouraging. Anything more than 10 and above though and it's largely meaningless as we'll be closer to third than the winners.If we can manage to close the gap to City somewhat on the last stretch, that would be encouraging.
Mourinho's United finished 19 points behind City - which is utterly hopeless. So, yeah - 2nd in itself doesn't mean much.
Yeah, it’s not.The same as Mous but better than VG which let's face it isn't an exceptionally high bar.
2nd place is great, even if the competition is mediocre. Mourinho finished second though, so I'm hesitant to get too excited lest it turn out to be yet another false dawn. Going out of the CL at the group stages (having been in such a strong position) and exiting the FA Cup at the quarters to Leicester needs to be acknowledged. I think he's earned another year and next season is make or break as to whether it's working.
I agree with the majority of what you've said there. More than happy to go into next season with Ole. I want to see an uptick in the football we play (first half vs. Everton being the standard I'd like to see), as well as improve results in games where it matters (vs. domestic rivals and in the Champions League and FA Cup - that Leicester defeat really fecking hurt), but in general I'd say it has been satisfactory. Most teams around us appear to be in transition so it's a good time to kick on now. No excuses.Second place is good for sure, but like under Jose, it's a distant second with no title challenge. In saying that, I certainly didn't expect a title challenge this season whatsoever. I expected a comfortable top four finish, and that looks all but achieved. I also wanted/expected a good cup run and an improvement in our playing style - so again, job done there. I would love to win the EL as I feel it would be a big milestone for Ole and the team getting a trophy under their belts.
There are/have been negatives this season and with Ole in general - and some make way too many excuses for him. However, I've seen progress and I'm happy enough to go into next season with him at the helm. As-per, some of the praise/criticism is bordering on insanity but it's best ignored. Most are fairly realistic about Ole and where we're at.
I don't know if they genuinely believe it - for some of them, at least, it's probably just a case of doubling down on everything because they're so dead set against Ole in the first place.
But IF people actually, genuinely believe our football under Ole is generally worse than what was served up under his post-SAF predecessors, then...yeah, what can you say? They can't be watching very closely.
Anyone saying that should be forced to watch any of the following games:
Liverpool - United 3-1 - the last game before Mourinho was fired
65-35 possession - we had 66% passing accuracy and shots were 36-6 for Liverpool
Any game in december 2015 - when we scored 2 goals in 5 matches and hardly created anything
Difference is he pulled a big result put his arse at the lowest pointThose were the lowest points for those managers, and soon after they were sacked.
At Ole's lowest point(s) the football was just as dire, the only difference is we didn't fire him.
Well eventually he would, simply because we refused to sack him and thus gave him ample opportunity to do so.Difference is he pulled a big result put his arse at the lowest point
Well eventually he would, simply because we refused to sack him and thus gave him ample opportunity to do so.
But regardless, I see little difference between the lows we sank to with other managers vs with Ole.
True. People meme about CL, but it does seem like at the end of the day that is the main requirement for staying in the job at Utd. In Ole's case, it would have been quite awkward sacking him so soon after giving him a permanent contract, so we let him carry on.We didn't sack Jose and Van Gaal when they hit lows first time. Van Gaal was sacked after 2 seasons even he finished 5th, Jose was sacked in 3rd season when we were 6th and he fell out with everyone possible.
If managers were sacked when they hit lows then Van Gaal wouldn't have survived first 10 games, Jose wouldn't have survived first season December.
We didn't sack Jose and Van Gaal when they hit lows first time. Van Gaal was sacked after 2 seasons even he finished 5th, Jose was sacked in 3rd season when we were 6th and he fell out with everyone possible.
If managers were sacked when they hit lows then Van Gaal wouldn't have survived first 10 games, Jose wouldn't have survived first season December.
Tomorrow’s our 50th game of the season and our season will be 204 days old, so we’re playing a game every 4 days. Our last uninterrupted season (18/19) took us 257 days to reach 50 games. Or a game every 5 days.
If anyone expects the quality of football to be anything other than laboured they need a reality check.
I don’t really see anybody else playing an amazing brand of football in the prem either. You could argue City but this isn’t a vintage side. Look at what happened to them today even though they’ve got the best squad in Europe.
Let‘s assess the quality of football when we can play down 2 flanks instead of one and hopefully have a regular striker to aim for.
Agreed.The same as Mous but better than VG which let's face it isn't an exceptionally high bar.
Everyone thought LVG was a banker for the sack the Christmas before he was sacked, and Jose lasted longer in the end than most expected.
I did feel Ole was in real danger of the sack circa October to December 2019, and I had totally lost faith by that stage. He then went on a remarkable run in 2020 and finished third. Without that run and CL football, I think he would have been sacked at the end of the season. Happy he's stayed in hindsight, as he's done a great job in many ways. My fear is he won't be able to take us to the next level, but here's to hoping he proves me wrong. His man management and the feel good factor he seems to have brought is fantastic. Either way, when he departs, he will leave us in a far better situation than Jose or LVG did.
I think there is a case for rose tinted glasses when looking back at fergie's football at Utd it wasnt always great entertaining football. We had teams and cycles that played some great football. We also had some teams especially post ronaldo and "no value in market" which could be quite dull but efficient and grind out results.
We had LVG possession based football which was very dull, but in fairness to LVG had he been given another season or two i think he would have put together a very capable team. But Utd wanted to try Mourinho and his results driven football in attempt to shortcut their way back to the summit. As we all know Mourinhos anti football was not a good fit with utd philosophy.
Ole has come in and has his own view with lighting transitions / counter attacking football. He's also not got all the personnel he needs and is trying to clearup a squad that was full of players of different footballing philosophies. That takes time, a few seasons to achieve. We are definitely struggling when facing a low defensive block and need players able to unlock a low block. Thats either spending alot in the market to bring in the right tools i.e. grealish/sancho etc or being patient and allowing those players to develop (diallo, pellestri, mejbri etc) and fixing other areas of the squad that need work ie. CB/CF/Backup RB etc. As long as Ole is qualifiying for CL every season then I'm happy for him to have the time to fix the issues over the longer term. The football will improve as the squad evolves. It just takes time.
We play okay at times,but our style of play is extremely ponderous,sterile and lacking in imagination.I have always been of the view that unless we sort out some of the structural problems within this squad,we won’t be able to improve beyond a point.No manager in the world can get this team to play swashbuckling football week in,week out.I’m just saying. It’s a drab as ever.
If we give this guy a new contract expect shit football, top 4 battles & zero silverware.
Waste of time watching us play.
My biggest problem with the current way we are playing is the shocking lack of basics. We havnt played well for 90 mins in a very long time. Probably since the Southampton game which we faced against 10 men. Although the performance against city was decent. Giving the ball away quickly after a thrown on, simple lazy giveaways in midfield to the opposition, lack of composure in tight situations, no urgency from our central defenders to get the ball out wide or central, and a lack of one twos, overlaps etc. Its baffling to see such talented players not impose thier qualities against mostly inferior opposition.
I'm very concerned because eventually poor performances will lead a levelling up of luck and come the crunch times like semis, this will lead to us getting knocked out or losing a huge game because we have looked so disjointed for a long time. We simply need to create more chances than we're doing and once the crowds return, any lost will look terribly amplified the way we playing
Yeah, it’s not.
Far better than both, short memories here.
Do we park the bus? No.
Do we pass sideways for 90 minutes? No.
Do we usually create a tonne of chances and have we been top scorers in the league until very recently? Yes.
Sorry totally disagree. The match day threads are an embarrassment of idiotic comments, always has been and always will be.Yeah it really is. We've played about 50 games this season and I'd say out of those games we've maybe put in about 10 really good performances with the other 40 being between average to absolute meh. You only have to go onto the post match thread after most games to see most of the comments reading something like bad performance but 3 points are all that matters over and over again. Yes so many games could be used as an excuse but that doesn't take away from the fact that normally we don't play good football.
Do we Park the bus? No, you're right. We normally don't but our transitional play from midfield to attack is still painful to watch.
Do we pass sideways for 90 minutes? That's very debatable. A lot of our possession comes from our back 4 playing your ball, my ball if they aren't being put under pressure. Maquire normally averages 66 passes in a game. Bruno who is our play maker normally averages 56 passes per game. Our other talisman this season, Rashford manages around 30 passes per game which shows where most of our possession is during a game.
We may have been top scorers until recently but that was due to a complete anomaly in the Southampton game. Even if we had of won that game 2 or 3 that would of put us around Spurs, Chelsea, Liverpool, Leicester levels. One crazy game really can skew stats.
I'm not talking about the match day thread which I agree is a vicious place but about the post match thread. Being honest with yourself how many times have you seen written, wasn't pretty, 3 points, we move on? And that's from people who think Ole is the one to take us back to the top. It's been a pattern ever since Ole signed as manager a lot more often than seeing great game, well deserved 3 points. For every one of those there's 3 of the others. Soon after people forget about the performances and concentrate on the result which is where I think is the biggest difference is between the Ole in/out crowd. Some see us second and don't care how we got there while others see us second and think how the hell did we get there with a lot of the performances we've been seeing? Because that isn't sustainable.Sorry totally disagree. The match day threads are an embarrassment of idiotic comments, always has been and always will be.
We don’t pass for passing sake, we are very direct, perhaps too direct. What I would say is our movement off the ball needs a lot of work, as it has for around a decade.
People can dislike the style but it’s provided the most goals in the league until around mid March, that fact tells a story. Especially when you factor in that our forwards have been way out of form compared to last season (apart from Marcus.)
Which means goals are being spread, which means chances are being created, which means there is a pattern to our play, which means we are attacking in our approach, which is totally different to the two previous Dinosaur managers.
Can you not watch today's game and see what a personality shift there is from being an Ole team instead of a Jose team?
Utter stupid post.
Again, yes it is.
Expected half time bumps .
But yeah guys stop pretending like we normally play like this
But yes That second half is exactly how we’re supposed to play. Just do that every time, every game every half.
Pogba free role, wing backs bombing forward.
One, two touches on the ball, running at people. Even Fred and Mctominay pushing forward.
We barely conceded any chances doing it so just do it from the start!
That whole half proves we don’t have to play as we normally do. It proves the players are capable of those type of performances.
He got it spot on today. The football for Fred’s goal was the best I can remember in god knows how long.