- Joined
- Jul 27, 2015
- Messages
- 575
He is a #10 who doesn't have a Premier League goal or assist for nearly a year and 7 months and is on 100,000 per week. How does that make him "an attractive player for many, many clubs." How many clubs in the bottom half are paying out 100,000 per week? No one is paying these prices for a guy who will give you a good work rate. I wouldn't be surprised if players like Grealish and Zaha are making less than Lingard. A lot of people are throwing around Everton's name - who does he replace in that starting 11? They are not paying 30-40 million and 100,000 per week for a squad player. No way in hell. We will get 15 million for Lingard and Woodward should run to the bank and cash that check before the manager of Lingard's new team actually sees him in practice and learns that his only quality on the practice pitch being is being "bubbly."Yeah, we won't pocket 45 million but on the other hand, many people are going way overboard in their criticism. Of course he's Premier League quality; the guy was starting for England at the last international tournament and has remained a part of the United team for many years, sometimes as a starting player. He's clearly an attractive player for many, many clubs, and if we weren't so bad at selling players at their true market value, I'd put him at 20-30 million.