Suedesi
Full Member
Now I dont actually like these two pr*cks. But can I just say - Whoever is taking those corners does a damn site better job than our team. Sign that person up
Peak Cringe
Now I dont actually like these two pr*cks. But can I just say - Whoever is taking those corners does a damn site better job than our team. Sign that person up
Greenwood has as many open play goals for us in a week as our main man Rashy has in 6 months.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/united-hour-the-falsest-nine-of-all.450821/#post-24748417
If you're interested in hearing our thoughts on Rashford*, feel free to give this episode a listen for a heated debate!
*Think its around 45 mins mark..
Where did you come with this 250k? He is up to 200k including bonuses, which mean he can be on 150k or even less.Been saying it for a long time, he is as average as they come. Just madness that our clueless board coughed up 250k/week contract for this guy.
And people need to stop with the CR comparisons.CR, messi, neymar, mbappe, even rooney, they are once in a generation type of talents. Rashford along with his buddy JLingz need to get kicked out of the club ASAP.
JLingz yes, there are other horrible players in the club who is worst than him. Not sensible to keep mata, young, matic rojo and co while kicking rashy out yet. He still may prove to be a decent back up, needs massive massive butt kick in the form of major competition though.And people need to stop with the CR comparisons.CR, messi, neymar, mbappe, even rooney, they are once in a generation type of talents. Rashford along with his buddy JLingz need to get kicked out of the club ASAP.
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/united-hour-the-falsest-nine-of-all.450821/#post-24748417
If you're interested in hearing our thoughts on Rashford*, feel free to give this episode a listen for a heated debate!
*Think its around 45 mins mark..
Of course our club is struggling and has struggled for the last few seasons and consistency has been almost non existent and every player has had their moments good and bad. Rashford is currently in a bit of a slump that this season being 1 of only 2 first team strikers is a bigger issue than if we had a couple more forward options but I find it crazy that he is being wrote off and put down so quickly.
Nice. Will give this a listen.
I get where you're coming from and the criticism of Rashford can turn into character assassination and go way overboard. My problem is I've watched most United games over the last few seasons and in my opinion this 'slump' of Rashford's takes place over the majority of the games I've seen him play for us. People talk about the PSG penalty etc. but the fact is that he was absolutely awful in that game, misplacing simple passes, constantly losing the ball. He had a purple patch in January of last year where he won player of the month and genuinely looked on course to be a world beater again, but this is the exception not the norm.
If you go over my posting history, I feel like I'm very fair about Rashford. Was as excited about him as a prospect as anyone when he burst onto the scene, after the Liverpool brace etc. (I did use the term 'Trashbonglahor' once but only because I got a bit irked by how snowflakey many posters are about any criticism of him at all). I don't ignore his good performances and comment if he's played well. But the fact is these moments of magic are extremely rare and it's little coincidence that placing our faith in him as our, or one of our, main attackers is coinciding with a slide down the table.
I blame the management of the player first and foremost over Rashford himself. He needs to be in a role with clear instructions and a defined way of playing, which I think he'd be very good at. But left to his own devices, and encouraged to believe he is some elite level forward who can singlehandedly win games is not working out. I do believe the hype has gone to his head a bit. So many people obviously think this now and comment on it. There's that saying 'there's no smoke without fire'.
I agree with you on how he is regularly the most frustrating player on the field in games and usually his mistakes and misses that would decide the game and I understand peoples outbursts for that reason but I prefer to post positively especially on our players as whats the points in being negative theirs enough negativity already around the club.Nice. Will give this a listen.
I get where you're coming from and the criticism of Rashford can turn into character assassination and go way overboard. My problem is I've watched most United games over the last few seasons and in my opinion this 'slump' of Rashford's takes place over the majority of the games I've seen him play for us. People talk about the PSG penalty etc. but the fact is that he was absolutely awful in that game, misplacing simple passes, constantly losing the ball. He had a purple patch in January of last year where he won player of the month and genuinely looked on course to be a world beater again, but this is the exception not the norm.
If you go over my posting history, I feel like I'm very fair about Rashford. Was as excited about him as a prospect as anyone when he burst onto the scene, after the Liverpool brace etc. (I did use the term 'Trashbonglahor' once but only because I got a bit irked by how snowflakey many posters are about any criticism of him at all). I don't ignore his good performances and comment if he's played well. But the fact is these moments of magic are extremely rare and it's little coincidence that placing our faith in him as our, or one of our, main attackers is coinciding with a slide down the table.
I blame the management of the player first and foremost over Rashford himself. He needs to be in a role with clear instructions and a defined way of playing, which I think he'd be very good at. But left to his own devices, and encouraged to believe he is some elite level forward who can singlehandedly win games is not working out. I do believe the hype has gone to his head a bit. So many people obviously think this now and comment on it. There's that saying 'there's no smoke without fire'.
Would anyone be averse to seeing Rashford in the 10 role? Looking over at Son, he's shining playing just off Kane.
I recall in Sons first couple of years he had the same errors in that he was horribly selfish and often inconsistent. Was almost sold and Spurs will be counting themselves lucky they never sold him in the end!
Not saying Rashford can be like Son but I feel in a 10 we can still leverage from his tracking back, his ability to take a couple of shots on without getting frustrated and also keeping options in a natural striker up top like Martial. It frees him from the burden of being the sole man up top and he may interlink well with others better in that role.
I mean, Mata Pereira and Lingard aren't working in a 10, Pogba is needed deeper apparently, so would anyone be averse to seeing a front 3 of:
James, Martial, Greenwood
With Rashford operating just behind them?
Rashford doesn't have attributes to play as 10, I struggle to name even one attribute that makes him a good 10.
#10 more often than not are playmakers, they should have very good eye for pass, composure and patience on the ball. They should see the full picture of what's going on around. Rashford doesn't have any of the attributes, he is more suited to wing role or striker role where he can use his pace and also end up with more 1v1 situations with defender.
Rashford doesn't have attributes to play as 10, I struggle to name even one attribute that makes him a good 10.
#10 more often than not are playmakers, they should have very good eye for pass, composure and patience on the ball. They should see the full picture of what's going on around. Rashford doesn't have any of the attributes, he is more suited to wing role or striker role where he can use his pace and also end up with more 1v1 situations with defender.
I agree, but his ability to overlap with the striker, work rate to track back, decent enough shot from range and willingness to dribble through players in my opinion makes him a better punt than what we've seen so far.
Agreed his best role really is wide but I wouldn't be against seeing him tested in the 10. James is better on the left anyway.
Yeah, not playing anyone in the #10 role is better than playing Lingard and Mata. Wouldn't mind him playing as 10, we should try all the combinations.
Would anyone be averse to seeing Rashford in the 10 role? Looking over at Son, he's shining playing just off Kane.
I recall in Sons first couple of years he had the same errors in that he was horribly selfish and often inconsistent. Was almost sold and Spurs will be counting themselves lucky they never sold him in the end!
Not saying Rashford can be like Son but I feel in a 10 we can still leverage from his tracking back, his ability to take a couple of shots on without getting frustrated and also keeping options in a natural striker up top like Martial. It frees him from the burden of being the sole man up top and he may interlink well with others better in that role.
I mean, Mata Pereira and Lingard aren't working in a 10, Pogba is needed deeper apparently, so would anyone be averse to seeing a front 3 of:
James, Martial, Greenwood
With Rashford operating just behind them?
I agree with you and it's at least worth a shot. He played at #10 in the youth teams mostly and i've long said his ability to pick a pass - when the play's in front of him - is underrated. I've seen him pick defence unpicking passes a number of times but usually from an inside left position. It's in tight spaces and when he runs with his head down that he's a bit of a liability, alongside his unconfident finishing. His worst position for me is #9 where he is absolutely toothless, not gambling on crosses or showing any predatory instinct alongside poor hold up play, poor finishing and zero aerial threat. He makes good runs in behind and that's the only thing he offers at #9. It's #10 or LW for me. Someone should make it his job and main priority to create chances because i got a strong feeling he's much better at this than finishing them. He could also run the channels occasionally as a #10, his crossing has potential to be genuinely world class, as well as shots from range.
It's not trying all combinations for the sake of it. He has a skillset that can be useful just behind the striker. I reckon he'd be better there than being the main striker anyway.
Yeah he needs to do better but he shouldn’t be written off, he’s demonstrated enough that the talent is there, it’s all about putting it together consistently.I'm all for criticizing constructively but there are many posts who are too harsh on Rashford. He is a kid, that's a fact. If our club is putting too much pressure then the blame is on them. He needs to improve a lot though
Now I dont actually like these two pr*cks. But can I just say - Whoever is taking those corners does a damn site better job than our team. Sign that person up
No. He's 21. With proper coaching and god man management he can be a very good striker for us. Just stop expecting that he'll be as good as Mbappé. He's not in that category.
The arrogance and delusion it takes to shoot from that angle on the FK... I'm lost for words, he's being enabled to act like a dickhead during games. This has nothing to do with age, it has nothing to do with experience. My 15 years old cousin knew it wasn't wise to shoot from there.
This and this again and again.The arrogance and delusion it takes to shoot from that angle on the FK... I'm lost for words, he's being enabled to act like a dickhead during games. This has nothing to do with age, it has nothing to do with experience. My 15 years old cousin knew it wasn't wise to shoot from there.
Confidence breeds talent.