lex talionis
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Messages
- 15,838
We should move on.
Sorry not buying this because it completely ignores the fundamental reasons why Bruno needs to go .Too many other problem positions to resolve unless we have some more Mainoos in waiting.
Considering his age, that's highly unlikelyTime to use his age as an excuse to transform him. Into a more composed midfielder than a gungho type of AM.
Which is why he made him captain?!!!No it's not sensible, I really believe that Mount was meant to replace Bruno and EtH was going to phase him out this year.
Solid reasoning to sell our best player.if RVN only got five seasons and Jaap only got three then I think we can let him go.
Which is why he made him captain?!!!
Not sure I agree, we do have problems all over the pitch but Bruno's wastefulness is a key cause of our inability to control games. His attacking output has plummeted and without that he is just a waste of spaceHe's definitely flawed but he's still one of our better players. I don't see the point in selling him unless it's for a LOT of money and/or we have a good replacement ready. We've bigger problems.
The better players can choose their moments when to play high risk passes or slow down the play. Bruno can't and one of the most frustrating things is how often he misplaces simple passes. His performances against the best teams have also been laughably badYou are always going to have risk takers in possession, and Bruno is absolutely one of those.
One of the reasons why some fans ended up booing Giggs was because he gave the ball away a lot, but that was generally through taking risks in possession in order to create chances. It doesn't excuse booing a player as brilliant as Giggs, which was pathetic given his contribution to the club, but it explains why the likes of Bruno take a lot of flak when they go through a rough patch: it seems like they are constantly stuffing things up even though they are just trying to make something happen.
Despite only having three assists this seasson, he's apparently created more chances in the league this season than, well, anybody.
Just give him time and he will be back. He's a creative player and when creative players go through lapses in form, it's more exaggerated because they are not there to play percentage passes.
If he wanted rid of Bruno he would have killed all the media/fan chat and got behind Maguire as captain.Who else could he give it to?
Rashford? Scott McTominay? Shaw?
Ole said himself:
Some weren’t as good as their own perception of themselves. I won’t name names, but I was very disappointed when a couple turned down the chance to be captain.
He is still top chance creator in the PL, though I’ll concede he needs to be more clinical when he has a chance himself.His attacking output has plummeted and without that he is just a waste of space
I do tend to agree with your assessment from an overall perspective moving forward, however I would challenge the assumption that EtH wants to play a posession-based system and how EtH utilises him.
EtH said that he wants United to be the "best transition team in the world", so I'm starting to wonder what has gone wrong here. Hypothetically, with players like Bruno, Rashford, Garnacho and Hojlund, we already have the tools up front to do that. The worry for me is that on paper we have the perfect attack "on paper" to achieve what EtH has stated, but we're nowhere near it.
I know many of us expected EtH to "do an Ajax" with United, but was all of that EtH or more like a cultural Ajax thing? There are clubs, like Ajax and Barcelona, who will produce players no matter who the manager is, to play a certain way. Are we giving EtH too much credit for a "total football" output at Ajax, when in fact he has shown no real desire to replicate that thus far?
Just throwing it out there for debate. I'm more concerned as to why we can't execute the style EtH has stated he wants to perfect with the profile of players we have, and not really what our style will be in the future and whether the players here will be suited to that.
Sell Bruno to Saudi and put in a 100m bid for Odegaard.
Erm noSolid reasoning to sell our best player.
Both players would have had much longer careers at United if they hadn’t upset the manager.
Bruno is the system with how much he dominates possession.Paradoxical statement. Bruno Fernandes cannot play in an actual system.
You’re making stuff up here. It’s documented in Ferguson own book that he sold RVN because they had an altercation at the league cup final. This was after RVN and CR7 had a bust up in training.Erm no
RVN was too much of a focal point, the manager rightly recognised the team would be better with a fluid front three of Rooney, Ronaldo, Tevez.
Stam, while annoying the manager also had an Achilles injury was in his late twenties.
According to the United manager's book, Ferguson was the subject of profanity from the Dutchman which then prompted assistant coach Carlos Queiroz to step in.
In the years that followed the altercation that Ferguson described as "fractious", the former Red Devils boss also made clear it was the beginning of the end for his goalscorer at the club
I'm really not.You’re making stuff up here. It’s documented in Ferguson own book that he sold RVP because they had an altercation at the league cup final. This was after RVN and CR7 had a bust up in training.
Erm no
RVN was too much of a focal point, the manager rightly recognised the team would be better with a fluid front three of Rooney, Ronaldo, Tevez.
Stam, while annoying the manager also had an Achilles injury was in his late twenties.