CM
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2014
- Messages
- 7,911
City obviously haven't gone about it in an organic way but the reality is they've been making better football decisions than us for some time. We can't go head to head with them through spending alone but that's also partly because of how badly we've spent our own money. That includes contracts for youth players. It's fine to say we have to develop players but we've given stupid contracts to players like Henderson, Tuanzebe and Brandon Williams which have impeded our chances of selling them for good fees, or even at all. If you're doing that it's no longer advantageous to bring those players through. Liverpool and Chelsea have managed that side of things so much better than us in recent years.I’d strongly disagree. Pragmatism is the core of everything in football. We dont have the same money as City who we compete with each year, so there will always be a level of pragmatism. City buys a back-up player like Kalvin Phillips for a shit-ton of money, but we need to develop players like McTominay and do with players like Wout because of constrains. Thats the way we can afford giving Rashford a big contract, signing Casemiro, Pogba, etc. That wont change permanently, I believe. You mention two areas in your post that we need to improve next year, but we need a striker even more. How would we buy upgrades in each area if the money just isnt there
If we only have a certain amount of money and player sales are needed to fund a new goalkeeper, then Eth will have to deal with uncomfortable pragmatic decisions again.
it might be that Kane/important targets costs more, and that we cant get sales of Maguire, VdB, Etc over the line to fund a new goalkeeper. Maybe the perfect fit that Eth wants for a goalkeeper is unattainable. Of course he needs to be pragmatic again next season, unless we magically get unlimited money and FFP constrains dont apply to us.
The contracts extend to the rest of the first team too. In the last 12 months we've had to let Matic, Pogba, Mata, Lingard and Ronaldo leave on free transfers because we've either held onto them for too long or given them contracts nobody else would. That's why it's imperative we don't do the same with De Gea. On paper it might seem like a cost saving exercise, but even on reduced terms he'd still be the best paid goalkeeper in the Premier League when his contribution to the team doesn't come close to matching that level, or our ambitions for the future. I can't emphasise enough how stupid it would be to give him that contract under the guise of pragmatism.
We have to get much smarter with our recruitment and we don't have to make a marquee signing every transfer window to facilitate change. I'd happily sacrifice the big names like Casemiro and Pogba if it meant the overall balance of our team was better. Look at Brighton - they operate on a fraction of the budget but they commit to a certain way of playing and don't deviate from it. They are so much more fluent at using the ball than we are as a result. They've got a better football operations than us but if Brighton can do it, there's no excuse for why we shouldn't.