Like i said, if you think de geas better thats fair enough, i can accept that as your opinion based purely on there abilitys as players. They both are/were outstanding.Madrid point is just conjecture, of course, but more general thought is that I find DDG more talented now than Pete ever was, even if Pete's career at United ends up being longer, more decorated, and more useful to the club overall. You're welcome to disagree, but see above for reasoning why contemporary players should be given the benefit of the doubt, if you're not controlling for era.
Furthermore, your reasoning is that, because you can name 3 players you find better than 3 of their precursors, people don't overrate older players? And you call what I've written rubbish? C'mon.
You don't have to shag him.He's still a little young for me.
He's still a little young for me. When he grows older I'll compare him to VDS. I never saw schmeichel so VDS was the best ever for me
Barnsley in the FA Cup in '98
Absolute clanger against Sheffield Weds in the 98/99 season.
There are more but I can't place the teams they were against right now.
Anyone remember Schmeichels dissalowed overhead kick goal? Who was that against?
]
De Gea is better than VdS for me.
Schmeichel is still the best though. Probably not as good as De Gea in a technical sense but his presence was much more important for us. De Gea makes amazing saves and does a decent job organising the defence. Schmikes organised the feck out of our defence and made a lot of crucial saves.
You don't have to shag him.
He scored against Rotor Volgograd in the UEFA cup, but we went out anyway
His disallowed goal was in an FA cup replay against Wimbledon. We out that day too
I'm sure you do.Appreciate the mature input.
You don't have to shag him.
I seem to remember Suker doing it to him twice in one game for Denmark. Schmikes in one-on-one situations was unreal though.As this thread has turned into one big nostalgia trip for my all time United hero, i would like to say if there was one weakness of Schmeichel it was that he was always susceptible to being chipped when off his line. Obviously it didn't happen alot but i remember the few times it did i was always thinking "FFS you're better than that!"
As this thread has turned into one big nostalgia trip for my all time United hero, i would like to say if there was one weakness of Schmeichel it was that he was always susceptible to being chipped when off his line. Obviously it didn't happen alot but i remember the few times it did i was always thinking "FFS you're better than that!"
Tosh.Lionization of older players makes perfect sense re: primacy and anchoring biases -- time obscures the past and earlier top players get more mindshare, leading to bloated opinions.
DDG is a better shot-stopper, with worse players in front of him, in a more competitive era. Best we've ever had -- people are hesitant to crown him because there's still a chance he's off to Madrid at some point. But would you say Giggs is a better player than CR7?
Yup, that's why he was sold by Juve, cause he wasn't a match saving keeper like Buffon, Casilas, DDG, Kahn or Big Pete.For me, generally speaking, VDS rarely made mistakes but he also rarely made saves where he had no right to get to it, while DDG constantly does that where you think 'how?!'. In terms of distribution, they are/were both fantastic but VDS was more consistent for me especially off the deck, while De Gea excels in kicking out of his hands but sometimes puts us in trouble when kicking off the deck from a pass back.
Organising and communication is hard to judge really but VDS seemed an excellent organiser of defenders but that's probably helped by the fact he had Rio-Vidic in front of him most of the time.
Overall, De Gea is above VDS IMO.
Sometimes he'd creep off the line too early and would be vulnerable to a chip, even from distance but that's about it.Really don't recall all these mistakes Schmeichel is supposed to have made, last season aside. I remember a complete mis-kick I think against Charlton in the FA Cup in 1994, maybe one or two dropped crosses, and that's about it for me - am I forgetting any major ones?
I absolutely think the 90s, and all eras were "competitive," but dominance in today's era simply means more, thanks to the reasons listed in my previous post. Thus, I tend to give more weight to more modern players' performances. Exposure, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with it.Tosh.
Nothing to do with lionisation (and idolism would have been a more appropriate word... we're not trying to turn Schmeicel into a celebrity or fete him). Best wasn't brilliant because we're all old and haven't got enough Youtube footage of him.... he was brilliant because he just was. Similarly, Messi isn't brilliant because modern TV shows him from ten different angles, he just is. And that applies to plenty of players between the two.... brilliance is defined by ability not era (even allowing for it being arbitrary and down to an individual's personal take on what qualifies).
I've watched United (and lots of football) for 40 years and I couldn't care if I was 14 or 40... if they're great (as Schmeicel was and De Gea is), they're great and I haven't got a bloated opinion of anyone ... a different opinion maybe, but that's what sport does.
The Giggs/Ronnie comparison is a poor example of an older player versus a current one ... ones a very very good player with amazing longevity, ones a GOAT. Not even close.
If you think the 90's weren't competitive, you didn't watch them.... we won loads because we had great players/teams not because of a lack of competition.
By all means have an opinion, by all means side with De Gea but don't come on implying that Schmeicel fans are all fogeys, forcing kids to listen about "the good old days" and holding a grudge because De Gea may one day move to his home town. Like Ronnie, I'd say "thanks, good luck".
Well said old-timer! ;-)Tosh.
Nothing to do with lionisation (and idolism would have been a more appropriate word... we're not trying to turn Schmeicel into a celebrity or fete him). Best wasn't brilliant because we're all old and haven't got enough Youtube footage of him.... he was brilliant because he just was. Similarly, Messi isn't brilliant because modern TV shows him from ten different angles, he just is. And that applies to plenty of players between the two.... brilliance is defined by ability not era (even allowing for it being arbitrary and down to an individual's personal take on what qualifies).
I've watched United (and lots of football) for 40 years and I couldn't care if I was 14 or 40... if they're great (as Schmeicel was and De Gea is), they're great and I haven't got a bloated opinion of anyone ... a different opinion maybe, but that's what sport does.
The Giggs/Ronnie comparison is a poor example of an older player versus a current one ... ones a very very good player with amazing longevity, ones a GOAT. Not even close.
If you think the 90's weren't competitive, you didn't watch them.... we won loads because we had great players/teams not because of a lack of competition.
By all means have an opinion, by all means side with De Gea but don't come on implying that Schmeicel fans are all fogeys, forcing kids to listen about "the good old days" and holding a grudge because De Gea may one day move to his home town. Like Ronnie, I'd say "thanks, good luck".
I couldn't remember off the top of my head what one i was thinking of in particular but that was the goal! That was a gutter when he did that.Philip Albert.
Still think you're looking for reasons to back up an opinion (or as Sherlock Holmes would say, twist facts to suit a theory). If your opinion is De Gea is better, fine - just give footballing reasons and don't assume why some of us rate certain players.I absolutely think the 90s, and all eras were "competitive," but dominance in today's era simply means more, thanks to the reasons listed in my previous post. Thus, I tend to give more weight to more modern players' performances. Exposure, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with it.
And the Giggs / Ronaldo comparison was an (admittedly too vague) exemplar of my point that, while most would argue that Giggs was the better Red (in terms of overall service to the club), Ronaldo was the better player while he was here. I think people give Pete that loyalty benefit, since DDG still hasn't quite committed his future.
I couldn't remember off the top of my head what one i was thinking of in particular but that was the goal! That was a gutter when he did that.
Nah. There's more to keeping than reflexes. Schmeichel was the best ever at one on ones as well, allowing a higher line of defending. And his anticipation was better. This, combined with his presence, allowed him to dominate his area more than any other keeper. Neuer is the closest thing to it, but he didn't have the same intimidating presence and has to compensate with speed. Schmeichel was basically the definition of the modern keeper before that idea became a thing.I think DDG is close to surpassing Pete. De gea's reflexes are just unworldly some of the saves he makes no other goalie in the world could make.
Schmeichel was a better leader and organizer than DDG and we were hugely successful with him net so that's a plus for him. But as good as Schmeichel was he was prone to the odd mistake which I think DDG has almost eradicated for his game.
We're basically just nitpicking. They are both 2 of the greatest goalies I have ever seen.
I really believe in 5-6 years time it's possible/likely we will have had 3 of the top 10 goalies of all-time on a consensus opinion. I do believe De Gea is g.o.a.t material and could/should prove it.
I think buffon is the standout post Schmeichel. Kahn and Neuer behind him. Then de gea.My scouse supporting mate (I know, I know) was out here last week and we talked a bit of footy and I mentioned this to him. He says Pete is by far the best goalie ever but in the post Schmeichel era he did concede that De Gea had no equal. He's usually pretty level headed/biased against us (for example doesn't think Pogba is a top 5 midfielder in the PL). I really believe in 5-6 years time it's possible/likely we will have had 3 of the top 10 goalies of all-time on a consensus opinion. I do believe De Gea is g.o.a.t material and could/should prove it.
Possibly. I haven't sat down and really thought about it, but I think he was one of the top 2-3 in the world for a number of years in a great era for goalkeepers. I'd imagine he falls in the list towards the bottom end.3? You think VDS is up there?
Possibly. I haven't sat down and really thought about it, but I think he was one of the top 2-3 in the world for a number of years in a great era for goalkeepers. I'd imagine he falls in the list towards the bottom end.