Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 42,989
It's very 'hope someone scores an absolutely mental ton' dependent.
However that has worked for them so far.
Ponting 2003
It's very 'hope someone scores an absolutely mental ton' dependent.
However that has worked for them so far.
Both semis were close. IND vs Aus should be a cracker.
Mental scar forever.Ponting 2003
Mental scar forever.
Aussies have to bat first and get at least 350 for it to be a good match.Both semis were close. IND vs Aus should be a cracker.
Another tournament another choke. Should write them off like we do Bafana Bafana.
People were slagging off Cummins when he took the captaincy, but what a year he's had - a win the in the WTC, retained the Ashes and now the ODI final (albeit having a slim chance of winning).
You wouldn't call this a vintage Aussie side either, although they're undoubtedly excellent in their own right.
Aus win the toss.. and they are bowling..
what the actual feck.. what the feck.
How much are BCCI paying them???
I am dumbfounded. Doesn't make any sense in my head.What a bonkers decision
It's like shooting yourself in the foot before a boxing match, I am sure the person you are fighting will be confused, but you will still lose the match.australia are the masters of getting inside the opposition’s heads. can easily see india wobbling to 120-5.
australia are the masters of getting inside the opposition’s heads. can easily see india wobbling to 120-5.
It's like shooting yourself in the foot before a boxing match, I am sure the person you are fighting will be confused, but you will still lose the match.
It is not an outrageous decision, but most people would have batted first.the pressure was already on india before the match started. this just adds a little more. everyone’s expecting india to cruise to a win. their form suggests that too. batting first they can beat themselves. if australia get off to a flyer chasing something down, they can beat themselves. i don’t think it’s an outrageous decision.
Perhaps, but I don’t see a weakness in this India team other than batting first and putting in a big total. India haven’t looked as comfortable chasing as they have batting first.the pressure was already on india before the match started. this just adds a little more. everyone’s expecting india to cruise to a win. their form suggests that too. batting first they can beat themselves. if australia get off to a flyer chasing something down, they can beat themselves. i don’t think it’s an outrageous decision.
It is not an outrageous decision, but most people would have batted first.
Perhaps, but I don’t see a weakness in this India team other than batting first and putting in a big total. India haven’t looked as comfortable chasing as they have batting first.