calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Don't understand cricket in the slightest but am hearing about this cat Maxwell's recent output. Is it Tiger Woods' level of excellence?
Nah he’s not Tiger level. Think Adam Scott level. Very good but not quite the ducks nuts.Don't understand cricket in the slightest but am hearing about this cat Maxwell's recent output. Is it Tiger Woods' level of excellence?
just wow. I boarded a flight when it was 95-7 thinking it was all but done. Got off the flight saw AUS won and Maxwell got 201 not out. Crazy stuff can't wait to watch the highlights!
England should tactically lose this game to allow European representation (Netherlands) at the champions trophy. For the greater good of the continent!Everyone called in sick or working from home for this clash of the continent?
England should tactically lose this game to allow European representation (Netherlands) at the champions trophy. For the greater good of the continent!
Don't understand cricket in the slightest but am hearing about this cat Maxwell's recent output. Is it Tiger Woods' level of excellence?
Unfortunately it seems the team has checked out. Root is a winner and facing defeat after defeat with no chance of progressing further here. This causes mental lapses. It’s all in the mind.What is Root doing playing that shot? He needs to be the anchor and play the overs. Let’s others play the silly shots.
Definitely you can tell there's no heart in anything we are doing tame chips to fielders or hand coming off the bat they just don't believe.England have given up here
England have given up here
Just need them to do it for one match against Pakistan as well. But they'll turn up and smash us
Just need them to do it for one match against Pakistan as well. But they'll turn up and smash us
Obvs, but I couldn't tell a good cricket at bat from a great bat. Don't even know if an at bat is called an at bat, but all of a sudden I'm seeing tweets blowing up about Maxwell's at bat being historic,You do know that Tiger Woods plays golf, not cricket, right?
It's Roy Keane vs Juve 1999 semi-final vibes.Don't understand cricket in the slightest but am hearing about this cat Maxwell's recent output. Is it Tiger Woods' level of excellence?
Perfect. Thanks.It's Roy Keane vs Juve 1999 semi-final vibes.
Took the game by the scruff of the neck and led them to victory when all the odds were against him through will and force alone.
Obvs, but I couldn't tell a good cricket at bat from a great bat. Don't even know if an at bat is called an at bat, but all of a sudden I'm seeing tweets blowing up about Maxwell's at bat being historic,
etc. Don't understand cricket one whit, but like to see & hear about memorable experiences in any sport.
That's why I asked if the at bat was at Tiger Woods' level of excellence like the 2000 US Open, he rewrote the record book for the majors in golf in that tourney.
I think this was (arguably) even better in some ways. Maxwell had to do everything by himself, his partner on the other end was essentially just turning up to watch him. Oh and he was limping on one leg.Perfect. Thanks.
I used to watch on occasion the second half of the 99 match against Juve when it was up on YT so I could watch Keane's performance.
See? No fecking clue.at bat
See? No fecking clue.
No, I was trying to showcase my avowed ignorance!Just the way you kept repeating it, like you thought it was correct.
No, I was trying to showcase my avowed ignorance!
What is an 'at bat' called in cricket?
Stokes ton
Nope he's been a pleasure to watch over the years,if He doesn't get knighted one day it's a travesty.Has there ever been a more clutch cricketer than Benjamin Stokes? His team looking dead and buried with Champions Trophy qualification on the line and he pulls a rabbit out of the hat.
Has there ever been a more clutch cricketer than Benjamin Stokes? His team looking dead and buried with Champions Trophy qualification on the line and he pulls a rabbit out of the hat.
Nothing say clutch like a century against Netherlands
Awesome. This is my first step in understanding cricket.Depends. If it's your entire time spent batting then it's an innings, if it's facing an individual ball then it's "on strike". You'd think the Tories would hate it.
Depends. If it's your entire time spent batting then it's an innings, if it's facing an individual ball then it's "on strike". You'd think the Tories would hate it.
It kind of does when you're a player who has scored multiple match-winning centuries across all formats, and who is renowned for digging his team out of tough situations.
Saying Ben Stokes isn't clutch. That is dumb, even for you.
It kind of does when you're a player who has scored multiple match-winning centuries across all formats, and who is renowned for digging his team out of tough situations.
Saying Ben Stokes isn't clutch. That is dumb, even for you.
I'm not sure it's mutually exclusive to just England fans though imo you can go in most cricket forums,cricket web etc and there's a high percentage of people who take comments/banter to heart or have a crazy bias.Why are England fans in this thread so touchy? It's really weird.
Agreed they had one camera view of it which was recorded with a potatoe and it still looked like he had something under it,seen way more contentious low catches given out before.Thought that looked out.