I disagree but the only way to know is by seeing what happens next season.
Bruno is just not that good in my opinion. His selling point is his numbers, I mean even this season where he's been poor he managed 10 goals and 14 assists, his value is in his goal contributions. In a vacuum that is great but as part of a team not particularly impressive when you watch the games. On the other hand you have a player like Bernardo Silva who has 13 goals and 7 assists and his performances have blown Bruno's out the water.
To me its simple, Bruno doesn't have the required skill or football IQ to be a top player. His big game record is what it is because he's easy to mark and poor in tight spaces. The term midfield Lukaku has been used and I think it applies perfectly to him. I can't see how such a player will be crucial to ETH's plans long term. But hey I could be wrong.
How has Bernardo's performances blown Bruno's out of the water?
Maybe by being part of a better team....., but very few players are better than Bruno at what Bruno does well:
Defensive work:
Bruno: 17,6 pressings/90 min - tackles won 1,3 tackles won/90 min
Bernardo: 15,1pressings/90 min - tackles won 1,0 tackles won/90 min
Chance creation/vertical passing:
Bruno: 0,25 xA90 - 2,54 key passes/90 - 4,48 completed passes into the att. 1/3 per 90 - 2,46 completed passes into penalty area per 90 - 5,66 completed progressive passes per 90
Bernardo: 0,21 xA90 - 1,70 key passes/90 - 3,22 completed passes into the att. 1/3 per 90 - 1,32 completed passes into penalty area per 90 - 2,78 completed progressive passes per 90
And the goals...
Bernardo's contributionrate has always been a bit too low for a player placed that high up the field. He's good at avoiding pressure and distributing the ball without risk though. I'd rather have a creative, hard worker like Bruno myself.