How many posters are banned ATM?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Describes any disease which progresses rapidly, spreading to other parts of the body and eventually leading to death."

+ cnuts

Implying the mods are killing the Caf
 
Veng said:
"Describes any disease which progresses rapidly, spreading to other parts of the body and eventually leading to death."

+ cnuts

Implying the mods are killing the Caf?

The mods admit to making mistakes.

Haven't noticed any members doing the same.

Funny how it keeps being dragged up again, provoking comment and confrontation. And insults flying at us which is OK, but we aren't supposed to do it back. :rolleyes:
 
This crap has been going on long enough. Decisions have been made and going on and on and on about them is pointless.

As BR said, let it drop and move on.
 
So slabbers being un-banned? To be fair, until the election falling out he was probably one of the most popular posters here. Might just put things to bed.
 
Veng said:
So slabbers being un-banned?


:confused: Where do you get that idea from?

As I said, decisions have been made. Let it drop. Move on.
 
Veng said:
"Describes any disease which progresses rapidly, spreading to other parts of the body and eventually leading to death."

+ cnuts

Implying the mods are killing the Caf

Ah, he was talking pathologically then was he?

You describe a malignant disease, not what the word malignant means.
 
Both sites seem to be getting on fine without harming each other...

Why are people still crying about it?

I'd ban them
 
Malign ant:

To make malicious, generally untrue, comment about a social insect of the family Formicidae.
 
Mods why don't you ban Smithers and unban Slabber and everone is happy?
 
Why don't you all mind your own fecking business. Banees can get in touch with us directly if they want to discuss their position, and don't need every other little chum of theirs moaning about that said position.

I can see it now on RR, there must be a huge thread with people pleading that the powers that be over there change their no Caf-Mod policy, but in truth, we don't give a shit, so please, those sticking up for us over there, could you please stop it as there is no need, although the thought is most appreciated.
 
WeasteDevil said:
I can see it now on RR, there must be a huge thread with people pleading that the powers that be over there change their no Caf-Mod policy, but in truth, we don't give a shit, so please, those sticking up for us over there, could you please stop it as there is no need, although the thought is most appreciated.

Firstly, why not just ask noodle if there is such a thread.

Secondly, there is no such thread.

Thirdly, caf mods give far more of a shit about all this than any members of RR.

Fourthly, no-one ever sticks up for you Weaste.

Finally, people are just questioning seemingly unfair behaviour in the moderation of a forum that states it will moderate strongly, but fairly.
 
Veng said:
Firstly, why not just ask noodle if there is such a thread.

Secondly, there is no such thread.

Really, I am surprised. Whoooooooooosh!

Veng said:
Thirdly, caf mods give far more of a shit about all this than any members of RR.

We are not the ones doing the moaning here are we? We are just minding our own business here, yet keep getting all this crap from your lot.

Veng said:
Fourthly, no-one ever sticks up for you Weaste.

That's because I neither need or require it. You're all a bunch of newbies that think they had a right to own the joint IMO. Malignant Wobbly said? Destroying the Caf you say? Has either of you ever thought that maybe the disease began when certain posters among your clientele were let out of ther newbie in the first place? Because it was fine before then! Surgery has taken place however, and the patient is clean and healthy again.

Veng said:
Finally, people are just questioning seemingly unfair behaviour in the moderation of a forum that states it will moderate strongly, but fairly.

No, you're all acting like a load of queers! You are not questioning, you are all having a whinge. Poor whatshisname, Aw, bless, aw, or whatever Shane would say.

Are these people that are banned not capable of sticking up for themselves? This isn't fecking playschool you know.

If you can have a forum that decides not to have Caf-Mods, fair enough, nobody is moaning. I agree with you, it's your call. It's our call to have a forum that is whatshisname free. This is not a democratic forum, it's privately owned, and we have been given the right to take certain decisions. It's been said before, if you don't like it, seek another place that you feel is fairer and more in line with your own personal opinions and views; call a strike, do what you like, because all of this whinging is getting out of hand and is no help at all.

We don't do this moderating buisness for a laugh, and we don't do it for any gain, so I don't see why we should be constantly spending our time running around replying to crap like this. I for one will physically delete anything along these lines that appears again.

Topic closed.
 
Nate said:
Surely the nature of "private" messages mean they aren't really any of your business unless someone is being hassled or getting pictures of cocks sent to them.

Huh?

Are you suggesting that someone has pm's Niall for permission to promote RR on here?

Or???????


Is posting a link to a website you might think someone would like to visit now banned?

Banned? No. But promoting other football websites is frowned upon particularly when it is a newbie who just joins to spam links to their own new web site.

Links to non-football web sites or news relted web sites etc are fine. It strikes me as only polite to ask Niall before promoting a football web site which targets his audience no matter how that request is made.
 
Veng said:
Firstly, why not just ask noodle if there is such a thread.

My telepathy tells me that anyone suggesting such a thing would have their posts edited to read "I'm gay".

Could be wrong mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.