Drifter
American
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2004
- Messages
- 68,568
Spot on.I prefer the Manchester United model
Always give youth a chance along side top quality players!
We don't need to follow anyone!
Spot on.I prefer the Manchester United model
Always give youth a chance along side top quality players!
We don't need to follow anyone!
That virtually no money is wrong, too - if we really pick a player from another club that is not a bargain because of release clauses or contracts that run out we usually overpay.
Something which doesn't happen in England anywhere near as often as it seems to happen there. Take Ballack, for example, at the time he was easily a 20-30M player (Rooney/Ferdinand fees) and I think you got him for 8M or so even when teams in other countries would have happily paid far more.
My point is this notion of hoovering domestic talent on the cheap is fundamentally flawed if you wanted to transfer it to an EPL environment because:
1. clubs don't sell to rivals except for ridiculous fees
2. if a player is hinting at not renewing they get sold before it is too late, preferably abroad
3. British players, like German ones, seem to have a strong preference for staying within their league, but aren't too fussed about destination beyond 4-5 clubs, as opposed to Bayern pretty much being able to sit back and wait for them to come to pappa
Something which doesn't happen in England anywhere near as often as it seems to happen there. Take Ballack, for example, at the time he was easily a 20-30M player (Rooney/Ferdinand fees) and I think you got him for 8M or so even when teams in other countries would have happily paid far more.
My point is this notion of hoovering domestic talent on the cheap is fundamentally flawed if you wanted to transfer it to an EPL environment because:
1. clubs don't sell to rivals except for ridiculous fees
2. release clauses aren't commonplace
3. if a player is hinting at not renewing they get sold before it is too late, preferably abroad
4. British players, like German ones, seem to have a strong preference for staying within their league, but aren't too fussed about destination beyond 4-5 clubs, as opposed to Bayern pretty much being able to sit back and wait for them to come to pappa
You have to keep in mind that in the Bundesliga, transfer fees are generally much lower than in Spain and especially england. The fees paid within the EPL even for mediocre talent have spiraled out of control completely. Until 3 years ago, 30 Million euros for Mario Gomez was the most any club had ever spent on a single player in Germany. Ballack's transfer was 14 years ago and if I remeber correctly he only had one year left on his contract. Pretty usual fee for a player of his calibre back in the day within the Bundesliga, I'd say, nothing to do with Bayern getting all the players for cheap.
This difference in "value for money" when comparing both markets is the big issue here.
3 happens in Germany, too. But when you e.g. take the Lewandowsky deal - Dortmund did not want to sell to Bayern...
4 Khedira, Özil, Mertesacker, Ter Steegen, Huth, Mustafi, Trapp, Poldolski, Schweinsteiger - there is a lot more - do not ply their trade in Germany. Just because that a lot talents think that it is too early to transfer as the Bundesliga offers them better development - and that some older players are content with their life in Germany - does not mean that Germans stay in their league. But - the Bundesliga is better than a lot of the other leagues and even if it does not pay like the EPL - let's you have a good income. Some prefer being in a European competition to transferring to a club in England without international play.
So reasons you've stated aside, you have no preference?The bayern model works because they have no domestic rivals who can compete economically... We have several
Barca can get the best young talents from all over Spain (we are limited to a certain distance and have to compete with city / liverpool and others) and Barca have many players live there and get many more hours training than we are allowed to live
Madrid is just a much nicer place to live plus they seem to be able to offer great image rights deals.
So e/boue for me
Chelsea model - stockpile players who could potentially be signed by rivals, send the vast bulk who won't make it on loan, and still retain a huge sum when selling to keep the cycle going.
E/boueSo reasons you've stated aside, you have no preference?
Are you mad? Some of our fans are bonkers enough, not even taking into account the scousers hijacking it!It would be great if they made like polls online of which players to buy and how much to pay for them.
I like what we are doing. Buying/bringing through people like Deulofeu, Lukaku, Barkley, Stones, Besic, Galloway, Garbutt etc., is much more risky when you're in a position like ours (On the cusp of Europe but always lacking what the top teams has - a true star) but it's way more exciting. Not saying i wouldn't mind us splashing out on a big player if we could though...
Barcelona Model:
GK Marc-André ter Stegen £10m
DF Gerard Piqué (£6m)
MF Ivan Rakitić £14m
MF Sergio Busquets
FW Pedro Rodríguez
MF Andrés Iniesta
FW Luis Suárez £65m
FW Lionel Messi
FW Neymar £71m
MF Rafinha
GK Claudio Bravo £6m
MF Javier Mascherano £17.25m
DF Marc Bartra
DF Douglas £4.4m
DF Jordi Alba £10m
MF Sergi Roberto
DF Adriano £8m
DF Dani Alves £23m +£7m
DF Thomas Vermaelen £15m
DF Jérémy Mathieu £16m
GK Jordi Masip
MF Alex Song £15m
MF Arda Turan £26m
MF Aleix Vidal £13m
Just short of £327m. 24 man squad with just 8 academy players. Let's not pretend they are any different.
As Pentame says, the only reason they had that model is because they hit gold for a generation, just like we did in 1992.