Badunk
Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Scumbags
Tony Barrett is the Merseyside football writer at The Times and he's pretty appalled by that decision.Not on The Times' front page either. Murdoch ...
Yeah his tweet is how I noticed. I doubt he's the only one outraged at that decision.Tony Barrett is the Merseyside football writer at The Times and he's pretty appalled by that decision.
Most of tomorrows papers will have Hillsborough on the front page, not The Sun though. I wonder if they'll mention it at all.
feckin subhuman scum.I read things like this and wonder how these people sleep at night. The below is about how The Sun blackmailed one of the Hillsborough families to get a school photo of their son to use.
If there is a legal case coming against them, then maybe they have been advised to not say anything. They might be asked if the government got them to print that stuff etc.Most of tomorrows papers will have Hillsborough on the front page, not The Sun though. I wonder if they'll mention it at all.
What disgusting people. I won't read that paper and other people should take the same stance.I read things like this and wonder how these people sleep at night. The below is about how The Sun blackmailed one of the Hillsborough families to get a school photo of their son to use.
What disgusting people. I won't read that paper and other people should take the same stance.
That Metro one is brilliant.
This is an interesting, and fairly scary read about how crowd crush occurs and the dynamics of when a mass of people get too closely packed together they take on the properties of a fluid in their movement.
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/c..._least/cw5vxtm
What a bizarre thing to be outraged by, especially given the fact the timeline suggests he read the news after the initial tweet. We all complain about stuff that is insignificant compared to the death of 96 people, but we don't have to put up with moral indignation for finding a crying baby irritating.I'm assuming that tweeting about a lad farting, at a time when a decision had been reached on jf96, hasn't gone down too well.
Completely agree. This could have happened to any set of supporters with the way things were going back then.This goes way beyond football, it shows the callousness that our institutions displayed towards the working classes throughout the 80s. It's a callousness verging on outright hatred and it flowed all the way from Thatcher downwards. Any kind of resistance was met with propaganda/lies and violence. It's great to see the antipathy exposed. Hopefully this is just the start for the families and gives them some sense of relief, however small.
Sure hope so. They have their part in covering up that story and printing lies.If there is a legal case coming against them, then maybe they have been advised to not say anything. They might be asked if the government got them to print that stuff etc.
Mr Speaker, the last question is for us:
What kind of country leaves people, who did no more than wave off their loved-ones to a football match, sitting in a court room 27 years later begging for the reputations of their sons, daughters, brothers, sisters and fathers?
The answer is one that needs to do some deep soul-searching.
This cover-up went right to the top.
It was advanced in the committee rooms of this House and in the press rooms of 10 Downing Street.
It persisted because of collusion between elites in politics, police and the media.
What an utter cnut, I imagine the rest of the board will have him booted off, I also imagine the families of the 96 won't give to fecks about this 2 bit nobody from a nothing club.Carlisle vice chairman getting his just desserts for his tweets yesterday
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sick-hillsborough-slurs-posted-twitter-7841695