goin4glory
New Member
Thought he was pretty average but glad to see him racking up asissts it'll really help his confidence.
Yup. Rashford is more unpredictable, which is bad for opponents and bad for teammates. Martial is much more predictable and collaborative.
Isn't that wilfully missing the point? You were baffled he wasn't taken off. He quickly showed why that was a good decision. Isn't it just easier to admit that than continue to trick yourself with a false narrative?
What false narrative. He played poorly but showed he can make decisive contributions. Those aren't mutually exclusive points. Rooney made the latter half of his United career out of that.
Fair enough on Jose for trusting him. I still think many defences of him remind me of Arsenal fans and Ozil.
Youvr been negative in this thrWhat are the rubbish comments ? It's becoming obvious that he doesn't offer enough in tight matches. Dire for 80 mins, then he pops up with two mint assists in the space of 2 mins today.
Amazing these 90 minute games. I bet you didn't experience the Fergie years. Support the team for 90 mins at leastWhat are the rubbish comments ? It's becoming obvious that he doesn't offer enough in tight matches. Dire for 80 mins, then he pops up with two mint assists in the space of 2 mins today.
Decisive contributions are a crucial part of an attacking players' performance and seperating them out is silly.
I don't get this criticism that for 70mins he was crap and then 20mins he was great. It was a slog out there for everyone and Clement set Swansea up to stop all play through the middle (making Mkhi's life a nightmare).
He's not Messi, he's not going to beat two men and score a worldy - he's the Armenian spy, slinking and probing around the box and he showed it today. Linked play well, two assists and maybe should have done better when he made space for that shot on his right.
A lot of assists but seems to go large spells doing a whole lot of nothing. Almost as he's playing within himself. Still would start him though
Don't ask me for tonight lotto numbersJust in time.
Why is it silly? Mhki was being bumped about like he was in a dodgem and was losing the ball a lot. Those aren't the hallmarks of a great performance. Say Rashford had ultimately scored today, would that have made the rest of his performance fine?
He's shown the disappearing part many times last season, hopefully we'll see more of the productivity this year.If he can be like Ozil then sign me the feck up.
It's pretty obvious why it's silly.
The way we evaluate overall performances is based on the performance in differently weighted individual attributes. For a player like Mkhitaryan the highest weighted attribute, by a significant margin, is creating goals. Losing the ball frequently is of the lowest attribute attributes. It might be annoying but it doesn't count for much.
Playing a significant role in killing off the game means he was one of the most influential players on the pitch - there can't be any question of that. Which is why any objective performance rating, quantitative or qualitative in nature, will rate Mkhitaryan as one of the best players.
It's pretty obvious why it's silly.
The way we evaluate overall performances is based on the performance in differently weighted individual attributes. For a player like Mkhitaryan the highest weighted attribute, by a significant margin, is creating goals. Losing the ball frequently is of the lowest attribute attributes. It might be annoying but it doesn't count for much.
Playing a significant role in killing off the game means he was one of the most influential players on the pitch - there can't be any question of that. Which is why any objective performance rating, quantitative or qualitative in nature, will rate Mkhitaryan as one of the best players.
Ozil's disappearing is overrated and his productivity is unreal. He is massively underrated by the "lazy" crew.He's shown the disappearing part many times last season, hopefully we'll see more of the productivity this year.
Thank you!It's pretty obvious why it's silly.
The way we evaluate overall performances is based on the performance in differently weighted individual attributes. For a player like Mkhitaryan the highest weighted attribute, by a significant margin, is creating goals. Losing the ball frequently is of the lowest attribute attributes. It might be annoying but it doesn't count for much.
Playing a significant role in killing off the game means he was one of the most influential players on the pitch - there can't be any question of that. Which is why any objective performance rating, quantitative or qualitative in nature, will rate Mkhitaryan as one of the best players.